IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v34y2014icp203-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy structure, energy policy, and economic sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Li-Ju
  • Lu, Lee-Jung
  • Tai, Meng-Yi
  • Hu, Shih-Wen
  • Wang, Vey

Abstract

While the burning of fossil fuels produces large amount of CO2 and damages the environment, the production and consumption of green power emit less CO2 and benefit the environment, such as refining agricultural wastes as bioenergy. However, the share of green power to total energy tends to be low due to the low private cost, i.e., excluding the external cost, of fossil fuels and the high production cost of green power. To reduce the total emission of CO2, it is necessary to modify the energy structure and internalize the external cost by taxing the use of fossil fuels. This study finds: 1) the economy will benefit from the development and the increasing usage of bioenergy, rather than fossil fuels, in the long run; 2) a higher energy tax will reduce the use of fossil fuels, which will yield an uncertain effect on economic growth and social welfare in the long run; 3) a rise in income tax has ambiguous effect on economic growth and social welfare in the long run; and 4) the income tax maximizing social welfare is higher than that maximizing economic growth rate, and the energy tax maximizing social welfare is also higher than that maximizing economic growth rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Li-Ju & Lu, Lee-Jung & Tai, Meng-Yi & Hu, Shih-Wen & Wang, Vey, 2014. "Energy structure, energy policy, and economic sustainable development," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 203-210.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:34:y:2014:i:c:p:203-210
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2014.08.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056014001075
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2014.08.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smulders, Sjak & Gradus, Raymond, 1996. "Pollution abatement and long-term growth," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 505-532, November.
    2. Ligthart, Jenny E. & van der Ploeg, Frederick, 1994. "Pollution, the cost of public funds and endogenous growth," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 339-349, December.
    3. Lans Bovenberg, A. & de Mooij, Ruud A., 1997. "Environmental tax reform and endogenous growth," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 207-237, January.
    4. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Dug Man Lee, 2008. "Dynamic Environmental Policy In Developing Countries With A Dual Economy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Dynamic And Stochastic Approaches To The Environment And Economic Development, chapter 10, pages 165-187, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Naifar, Nader & Al Dohaiman, Mohammed Saleh, 2013. "Nonlinear analysis among crude oil prices, stock markets' return and macroeconomic variables," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 416-431.
    6. Jin, Jang C. & Choi, Jai-Young & Yu, Eden S.H., 2009. "Energy prices, energy conservation, and economic growth: Evidence from the postwar United States," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 691-699, October.
    7. Chung-Huang Huang & Deqin Cai, 1994. "Constant-returns endogenous growth with pollution control," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 4(4), pages 383-400, August.
    8. Lans Bovenberg, A. & Smulders, Sjak, 1995. "Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 369-391, July.
    9. Raymond Gradus & Sjak Smulders, 1993. "The trade-off between environmental care and long-term growth—Pollution in three prototype growth models," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 25-51, February.
    10. Jhy-hwa Chen & Ching-chong Lai & Jhy-yuan Shieh, 2003. "Anticipated Environmental Policy and Transitional Dynamics in an Endogenous Growth Model," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 25(2), pages 233-254, June.
    11. Jhy-yuan Shieh & Ching-chong Lai & Jhy-hwa Chen, 2001. "A Comment on Huang and Cai's Constant-Returns Endogenous Growth with Pollution Control," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 20(2), pages 165-172, October.
    12. Tahvonen, Olli & Kuuluvainen, Jari, 1991. "Optimal growth with renewable resources and pollution," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2-3), pages 650-661, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Wyrwa & Anetta Barska & Janina Jedrzejczak-Gas & Marianna Sinicakova, 2020. "Industry 4.0 and Social Development in the Aspect of Sustainable Development: Relations in EC Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1068-1097.
    2. Sergii VOITKO & Irina GRINKO, 2017. "Comparative analysis of countries in the peer-group based on economic potential and components of sustainable development," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 9(3), pages 359-376, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chu, Hsun & Lai, Ching-chong, 2014. "Abatement R&D, market imperfections, and environmental policy in an endogenous growth model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 20-37.
    2. Chen, Jhy-hwa & Shieh, Jhy-yuan & Chang, Juin-jen & Lai, Ching-chong, 2009. "Growth, welfare and transitional dynamics in an endogenously growing economy with abatement labor," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 423-437, September.
    3. Jhy-hwa Chen & Ching-chong Lai & Jhy-yuan Shieh, 2003. "Anticipated Environmental Policy and Transitional Dynamics in an Endogenous Growth Model," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 25(2), pages 233-254, June.
    4. Shieh, Jhy-yuan & Chen, Jhy-hwa & Chang, Shu-hua & Lai, Ching-chong, 2014. "Environmental consciousness, economic growth, and macroeconomic instability," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 151-160.
    5. Chen Jhy-hwa & Shieh Jhy-yuan & Chang Juin-jen, 2015. "Environmental policy and economic growth: the macroeconomic implications of the health effect," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 223-253, January.
    6. Sjak Smulders, 1995. "Entropy, environment, and endogenous economic growth," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 2(2), pages 319-340, August.
    7. Barthel, Jens, 2007. "Environmental policy in dynamic models with pollution by consumers: The impact of exogenous shocks and dozy politicians," MPRA Paper 8229, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Juin‐Jen Chang & Jhy‐Hwa Chen & Jhy‐Yuan Shieh & Ching‐Chong Lai, 2009. "Optimal Tax Policy, Market Imperfections, and Environmental Externalities in a Dynamic Optimizing Macro Model," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 11(4), pages 623-651, August.
    9. Itaya, Jun-ichi, 2008. "Can environmental taxation stimulate growth? The role of indeterminacy in endogenous growth models with environmental externalities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 1156-1180, April.
    10. Barthel, Jens, 2007. "Environmental policy in dynamic models with pollution by consumers: The greening and blackening of preferences," MPRA Paper 8230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Barthel, Jens, 2005. "Environmental policy in dynamic models: The impact of the elasticity of substitution if consumers pollute," MPRA Paper 8228, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Smulders, Sjak & Gradus, Raymond, 1996. "Pollution abatement and long-term growth," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 505-532, November.
    13. Marsiliani, L. & Renstrom, T.I., 2000. "Inequality, Environmental Protection and Growth," Discussion Paper 2000-34, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    14. Chu, Hsun & Lai, Ching-chong & Liao, Chih-hsing, 2016. "A Note On Environment-Dependent Time Preferences," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(6), pages 1652-1667, September.
    15. Fullerton, Don & Kim, Seung-Rae, 2008. "Environmental investment and policy with distortionary taxes, and endogenous growth," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 141-154, September.
    16. Dagmar Nelissen & Till Requate, 2007. "Pollution-reducing and resource-saving technological progress," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 5-44.
    17. Xepapadeas, Anastasios, 2005. "Economic growth and the environment," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 23, pages 1219-1271, Elsevier.
    18. Laura Marsiliani & Thomas Renstrom, 2002. "Inequality, Environmental Protection and Growth," Wallis Working Papers WP35, University of Rochester - Wallis Institute of Political Economy.
    19. Cyrus Chu, C.Y. & Lai, Ching-Chong & Liao, Chih-Hsing, 2014. "How could the non-sustainable Easter Island have been sustained?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 161-174.
    20. J.Aznar-Márquez & J.R. Ruiz-Tamarit, 2004. "Non-Catastrophic Endogenous Growth with Pollution and Abatement," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2004/80, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:34:y:2014:i:c:p:203-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.