IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v69y2018icp59-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Level of service and the transit neighbourhood - Observations from Dublin city and suburbs

Author

Listed:
  • O'Connor, David
  • Caulfield, Brian

Abstract

Few studies have looked at the impact Level-of-Service (LOS) might have on the distances people walk to public transport. The relationship, if any, has implications for transit-oriented-development and the viability of different transit modes serving suburban areas. This paper examines pedestrian catchment areas and LOS across a light rail, a metro rail and two bus corridors in Dublin. Public transport users have been surveyed at 17 stops around the city and their trip origin identified. Catchment areas for bus services with high levels of service were found to be comparable and often greater than those for LRT or metro rail. 65% of all bus trip-origins are more than 500 m from stops. A standard distance analysis suggests natural catchment limits of over 1400 m for high quality bus, significantly greater than light rail and metro rail of similar service levels. The shape of transit catchment areas are also distinctive and appear to be most influenced by: network density, stopping patterns, urban gravity and quality of service. While further analysis is recommended, public transport users in Dublin city and suburbs appear more influenced by level-of-service than by modal type when deciding how far they are prepared to walk to public transport.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Connor, David & Caulfield, Brian, 2018. "Level of service and the transit neighbourhood - Observations from Dublin city and suburbs," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 59-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:59-67
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073988591730269X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniels, Rhonda & Mulley, Corinne, 2013. "Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 6(2), pages 5-20.
    2. Jiang, Yang & Christopher Zegras, P. & Mehndiratta, Shomik, 2012. "Walk the line: station context, corridor type and bus rapid transit walk access in Jinan, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14.
    3. Paulley, Neil & Balcombe, Richard & Mackett, Roger & Titheridge, Helena & Preston, John & Wardman, Mark & Shires, Jeremy & White, Peter, 2006. "The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 295-306, July.
    4. Ahmed El-Geneidy & Michael Grimsrud & Rania Wasfi & Paul Tétreault & Julien Surprenant-Legault, 2014. "New evidence on walking distances to transit stops: identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 193-210, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Telan Wu & Hui Jin & Xiaoguang Yang, 2022. "To What Extent May Transit Stop Spacing Be Increased before Driving Away Riders? Referring to Evidence of the 2017 NHTS in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Adrian Barchański & Renata Żochowska & Marcin Jacek Kłos, 2022. "A Method for the Identification of Critical Interstop Sections in Terms of Introducing Electric Buses in Public Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-37, October.
    3. Hansson, Joel & Pettersson-Löfstedt, Fredrik & Svensson, Helena & Wretstrand, Anders, 2021. "Replacing regional bus services with rail: Changes in rural public transport patronage in and around villages," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 89-99.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mulley, Corinne & Ho, Chinh & Ho, Loan & Hensher, David & Rose, John, 2018. "Will bus travellers walk further for a more frequent service? An international study using a stated preference approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 88-97.
    2. Pueboobpaphan, Rattaphol & Pueboobpaphan, Suthatip & Sukhotra, Suthasinee, 2022. "Acceptable walking distance to transit stations in Bangkok, Thailand: Application of a stated preference technique," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Wang, Jueyu & Cao, Xinyu, 2017. "Exploring built environment correlates of walking distance of transit egress in the Twin Cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 132-138.
    4. Manout, Ouassim & Bonnel, Patrick & Bouzouina, Louafi, 2018. "Transit accessibility: A new definition of transit connectors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 88-100.
    5. Vale, David S. & Viana, Cláudia M. & Pereira, Mauro, 2018. "The extended node-place model at the local scale: Evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon's subway network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 282-293.
    6. Azad, Mojdeh & Abdelqader, Dua & Taboada, Luis M. & Cherry, Christopher R., 2021. "Walk-to-transit demand estimation methods applied at the parcel level to improve pedestrian infrastructure investment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Gan, Zuoxian & Yang, Min & Zeng, Qingcheng & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2021. "Associations between built environment, perceived walkability/bikeability and metro transfer patterns," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 171-187.
    8. Abenoza, Roberto F. & Liu, Chengxi & Cats, Oded & Susilo, Yusak O., 2019. "What is the role of weather, built-environment and accessibility geographical characteristics in influencing travelers’ experience?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 34-50.
    9. Olga Tzanni & Paraskevas Nikolaou & Stella Giannakopoulou & Apostolos Arvanitis & Socrates Basbas, 2022. "Social Dimensions of Spatial Justice in the Use of the Public Transport System in Thessaloniki, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    10. Ouassim Manout & Patrick Bonnel & François Pacull, 2020. "The impact of centroid connectors on transit assignment outcomes," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 611-629, October.
    11. Mingzhu Song & Yi Zhang & Meng Li & Yi Zhang, 2021. "Accessibility of Transit Stops with Multiple Feeder Modes: Walking and Private-Bike Cycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    12. Gupta, Akshay & Bivina, G.R. & Parida, Manoranjan, 2022. "Does neighborhood design matter for walk access to metro stations? An integrated SEM-Hybrid discrete mode choice approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 61-77.
    13. Panyu Tang & Mahdi Aghaabbasi & Mujahid Ali & Amin Jan & Abdeliazim Mustafa Mohamed & Abdullah Mohamed, 2022. "How Sustainable Is People’s Travel to Reach Public Transit Stations to Go to Work? A Machine Learning Approach to Reveal Complex Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Tao, Tao & Wang, Jueyu & Cao, Xinyu, 2020. "Exploring the non-linear associations between spatial attributes and walking distance to transit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Guowei Lyu & Luca Bertolini & Karin Pfeffer, 2020. "Is Labour Productivity Higher in Transit Oriented Development Areas? A Study of Beijing," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(4), pages 652-670, September.
    16. Acton, Blake & Le, Huyen T.K. & Miller, Harvey J., 2022. "Impacts of bus rapid transit (BRT) on residential property values: A comparative analysis of 11 US BRT systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    17. Venter, Christoffel J., 2020. "Measuring the quality of the first/last mile connection to public transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. David S Vale & Mauro Pereira, 2017. "The influence of the impedance function on gravity-based pedestrian accessibility measures: A comparative analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(4), pages 740-763, July.
    19. Bueno Rezendede Castro, André & Ortega Sandoval, Abby Daniela & Odamtten, Genevieve, 2022. "Up around the bend? How transport poverty can lead to social exclusion in a low-income community in Lagos, Nigeria," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    20. Javanmard, Reyhane & Lee, Jinhyung & Kim, Kyusik & Park, Jinwoo & Diab, Ehab, 2024. "Evaluating the impacts of supply-demand dynamics and distance decay effects on public transit project assessment: A study of healthcare accessibility and inequalities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Level of service; Service area; Catchment area; Public transport; Network analysis; Walkable neighbourhood; Transit neighbourhood;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:59-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.