IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v103y2024ics0739885923001427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering collaboration and coordination in urban delivery: a multi-agent microsimulation model

Author

Listed:
  • Gómez-Marín, Cristian Giovanny
  • Comi, Antonio
  • Serna-Urán, Conrado Augusto
  • Zapata-Cortés, Julián Andrés

Abstract

Given the dynamic nature of Urban Freight Transport (UFT) processes, the involved transport and logistics operators face with internal and external issues that should tackle to improve last-mile levels of service and decrease total costs while performing delivery operations. Customers (i.e., freight receivers) perceive the level of service through the acceptance of their requests, while total operational costs are mainly determined by the total travel costs (i.e., distance and/or time) required to accomplish the customers' request. In addition, the vehicle-kilometres travelled are related to the externalities produced. Given that the actors involved in the process operate in a stochastic environment (with changes that can occur both in terms of demand – receivers' requests, and in supply – travel times), collaboration and coordination among the operators could play a key role in meeting the customers' requests as well as in reducing both internal and external delivery costs. Therefore, the paper proposes an UFT modelling framework that integrates collaboration and coordination processes among the different involved actors, and allows the benefits to be assessed. The model has a multi-agent architecture based on microsimulation. In particular, the multi-agent architecture allows us to point out the different actors’ responses to various internal (e.g., delivery requests) and external (e.g., delivery times) changes occurring in the daily delivery operations. It consists of three layers. The first one simulates the interactions among actors operating collaboratively. The second layer microsimulates the collaborative processes of information management. Finally, a third layer integrates the two previous layers, facilitating a decision-making process in such a dynamic context. The whole modelling framework is tested in a real case study in which it is possible to validate pros and cons of working in a collaborative and coordinative environment. The results show significant benefits from actors/operators involved in the process and subsequently can address the policy/measure implementation towards a more sustainable and liveable city.

Suggested Citation

  • Gómez-Marín, Cristian Giovanny & Comi, Antonio & Serna-Urán, Conrado Augusto & Zapata-Cortés, Julián Andrés, 2024. "Fostering collaboration and coordination in urban delivery: a multi-agent microsimulation model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:103:y:2024:i:c:s0739885923001427
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885923001427
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Musolino, Giuseppe & Rindone, Corrado & Polimeni, Antonio & Vitetta, Antonino, 2019. "Planning urban distribution center location with variable restocking demand scenarios: General methodology and testing in a medium-size town," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 157-166.
    2. Francesco Russo & Antonio Comi, 2020. "Investigating the Effects of City Logistics Measures on the Economy of the City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Rieck, Julia & Ehrenberg, Carsten & Zimmermann, Jürgen, 2014. "Many-to-many location-routing with inter-hub transport and multi-commodity pickup-and-delivery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(3), pages 863-878.
    4. Francesco Russo & Antonio Comi, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Delivery: The Learning Process of Path Costs Enhanced by Information and Communication Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Yong Wang & Yingying Yuan & Xiangyang Guan & Haizhong Wang & Yong Liu & Maozeng Xu, 2019. "Collaborative Mechanism for Pickup and Delivery Problems with Heterogeneous Vehicles under Time Windows," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-30, June.
    6. Francesco Russo & Antonio Comi, 2010. "A modelling system to simulate goods movements at an urban scale," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 987-1009, November.
    7. Firdausiyah, N. & Taniguchi, E. & Qureshi, A.G., 2019. "Modeling city logistics using adaptive dynamic programming based multi-agent simulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 74-96.
    8. Guo, Chaojie & Thompson, Russell G. & Foliente, Greg & Kong, Xiang T.R., 2021. "An auction-enabled collaborative routing mechanism for omnichannel on-demand logistics through transshipment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Zhang, Wei & Jenelius, Erik & Ma, Xiaoliang, 2017. "Freight transport platoon coordination and departure time scheduling under travel time uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-23.
    10. Franceschetti, Anna & Honhon, Dorothée & Laporte, Gilbert & Woensel, Tom Van & Fransoo, Jan C., 2017. "Strategic fleet planning for city logistics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 19-40.
    11. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Shi, Wenming & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "Shoppers’ logistics activities in omni-channel retailing: A conceptualisation and an exploration on perceptual differences in effort valuation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 195-208.
    12. Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Marialisa Nigro & Sergio Maria Patella & Simone Serafini, 2018. "Public Transport-Based Crowdshipping for Sustainable City Logistics: Assessing Economic and Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Lai, Minghui & Cai, Xiaoqiang & Hu, Qian, 2017. "An iterative auction for carrier collaboration in truckload pickup and delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 60-80.
    14. Pourrahmani, Elham & Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    15. Comi, Antonio, 2020. "A modelling framework to forecast urban goods flows," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    16. Li, Hongqi & Chen, Jun & Wang, Feilong & Bai, Ming, 2021. "Ground-vehicle and unmanned-aerial-vehicle routing problems from two-echelon scheme perspective: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1078-1095.
    17. Cleophas, Catherine & Cottrill, Caitlin & Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Tierney, Kevin, 2019. "Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 801-816.
    18. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl & Philipp E. H. Salzmann, 2018. "Exact solutions for the collaborative pickup and delivery problem," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(2), pages 357-371, June.
    19. Roberta Alves & Renato da Silva Lima & David Custódio de Sena & Alexandre Ferreira de Pinho & José Holguín-Veras, 2019. "Agent-Based Simulation Model for Evaluating Urban Freight Policy to E-Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Barenji, Ali Vatankhah & Wang, W.M. & Li, Zhi & Guerra-Zubiaga, David A., 2019. "Intelligent E-commerce logistics platform using hybrid agent based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 15-31.
    21. Verlinden, Thomas & Voorde, Eddy Van de & Dewulf, Wouter, 2020. "Ho.Re.Ca. logistics and European medieval structured cities: A search for cost generators," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 419-429.
    22. Alexander Rossolov & Halyna Rossolova & José Holguín-Veras, 2021. "Online and in-store purchase behavior: shopping channel choice in a developing economy," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3143-3179, December.
    23. Seung Yoon Ko & Ratna Permata Sari & Muzaffar Makhmudov & Chang Seong Ko, 2020. "Collaboration Model for Service Clustering in Last-Mile Delivery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    24. Marcucci, Edoardo & Le Pira, Michela & Gatta, Valerio & Inturri, Giuseppe & Ignaccolo, Matteo & Pluchino, Alessandro, 2017. "Simulating participatory urban freight transport policy-making: Accounting for heterogeneous stakeholders’ preferences and interaction effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 69-86.
    25. Marius M. Solomon, 1987. "Algorithms for the Vehicle Routing and Scheduling Problems with Time Window Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 254-265, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Maria Patella & Gianluca Grazieschi & Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Stefano Carrese, 2020. "The Adoption of Green Vehicles in Last Mile Logistics: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Amaya, Johanna & Delgado-Lindeman, Maira & Arellana, Julian & Allen, Jaime, 2021. "Urban freight logistics: What do citizens perceive?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Alves, Roberta & Pereira, Cecília Aparecida & Lima, Renato da Silva, 2023. "Operational cost analysis for e-commerce deliveries using agent-based modeling and simulation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Soriano, Adria & Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2023. "The multi-depot vehicle routing problem with profit fairness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    5. Vasco Silva & António Amaral & Tânia Fontes, 2023. "Sustainable Urban Last-Mile Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    6. Kim, Nayeon & Montreuil, Benoit & Klibi, Walid & Kholgade, Nitish, 2021. "Hyperconnected urban fulfillment and delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Vidal, Thibaut & Laporte, Gilbert & Matl, Piotr, 2020. "A concise guide to existing and emerging vehicle routing problem variants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 401-416.
    8. Soriano, Adria & Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2022. "Reprint of: The multi-depot vehicle routing problem with profit fairness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    9. Filip Škultéty & Dominika Beňová & Jozef Gnap, 2021. "City Logistics as an Imperative Smart City Mechanism: Scrutiny of Clustered EU27 Capitals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    11. Zahra Sadat Hasanpour Jesri & Kourosh Eshghi & Majid Rafiee & Tom Van Woensel, 2022. "The Multi-Depot Traveling Purchaser Problem with Shared Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Le Colleter, Théo & Dumez, Dorian & Lehuédé, Fabien & Péton, Olivier, 2023. "Small and large neighborhood search for the park-and-loop routing problem with parking selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1233-1248.
    13. Rémy Dupas & Eiichi Taniguchi & Jean-Christophe Deschamps & Ali G. Qureshi, 2020. "A Multi-commodity Network Flow Model for Sustainable Performance Evaluation in City Logistics: Application to the Distribution of Multi-tenant Buildings in Tokyo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Konstantina Katsela & Michael Browne, 2019. "Importance of the Stakeholders’ Interaction: Comparative, Longitudinal Study of Two City Logistics Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Marisdea Castiglione & Antonio Comi & Rosita De Vincentis & Andreea Dumitru & Marialisa Nigro, 2022. "Delivering in Urban Areas: A Probabilistic-Behavioral Approach for Forecasting the Use of Electric Micromobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, July.
    16. Orhan, Cosku Can & Goez, Julio Cesar & Guajardo, Mario & Osicka, Ondrej & Wallace, Stein W., 2024. "Assessing macro effects of freight consolidation on the livability of small cities using vehicle routing as micro models: The case of Bergen, Norway," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. Gabriele Iannaccone & Edoardo Marcucci & Valerio Gatta, 2021. "What Young E-Consumers Want? Forecasting Parcel Lockers Choice in Rome," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Liu, Sijing & He, Nannan & Cao, Xindan & Li, Guoqi & Jian, Ming, 2022. "Logistics cluster and its future development: A comprehensive research review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Guo, Wenjing & Zhang, Yimeng & Li, Wenfeng & Negenborn, Rudy R. & Atasoy, Bilge, 2024. "Augmented Lagrangian relaxation-based coordinated approach for global synchromodal transport planning with multiple operators," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    20. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl & Sarah Wieser, 2021. "Assignment constraints in shared transportation services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 513-539, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:103:y:2024:i:c:s0739885923001427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.