IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v80y2017icp585-596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acoustic of lightweight timber buildings: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Caniato, Marco
  • Bettarello, Federica
  • Ferluga, Alessio
  • Marsich, Lucia
  • Schmid, Chiara
  • Fausti, Patrizio

Abstract

This paper presents a literature overview of the acoustic studies dedicated to lightweight wooden constructions. The reviewed articles contain prediction models, laboratory and field measurements, finite element or computational investigations as well as subjective survey describing the vibro-acoustic behaviour of a large range of wooden structures. The review analyses different type of timber constructions and investigates the acoustic research methodologies highlighting the following aspects: airborne sound insulation, impact noise reduction, flanking transmissions, human perceptions and pros and cons of the presented methods. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis of impact noise of bare floors focuses on how impact sound reduction could not be as efficient as in heavyweight constructions; the comparison between the different approaches on prediction of airborne sound insulation of multilayer timber partitions compared to traditional heavy building materials is shown. Finally a subjective method survey is provided, underlining the weakest point of timber buildings: low frequency sound insulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Caniato, Marco & Bettarello, Federica & Ferluga, Alessio & Marsich, Lucia & Schmid, Chiara & Fausti, Patrizio, 2017. "Acoustic of lightweight timber buildings: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 585-596.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:80:y:2017:i:c:p:585-596
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117307451
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Won-hak & Kim, Kyoung-woo & Lim, Seock-ho, 2014. "Improvement of floor impact sound on modular housing for sustainable building," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 263-275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Jiayu & Qiu, Qiwen & Han, Yilong & Lau, Denvid, 2019. "Piezoelectric materials for sustainable building structures: Fundamentals and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 14-25.
    2. Antonino Di Bella & Milica Mitrovic, 2020. "Acoustic Characteristics of Cross-Laminated Timber Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Łukasz Nowotny & Jacek Nurzyński, 2020. "The Influence of Insulating Layers on the Acoustic Performance of Lightweight Frame Floors Intended for Use in Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Marco Caniato & Andrea Gasparella, 2019. "Discriminating People’s Attitude towards Building Physical Features in Sustainable and Conventional Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Caniato & Andrea Gasparella, 2019. "Discriminating People’s Attitude towards Building Physical Features in Sustainable and Conventional Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Fred Edmond Boafo & Jin-Hee Kim & Jun-Tae Kim, 2016. "Performance of Modular Prefabricated Architecture: Case Study-Based Review and Future Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:80:y:2017:i:c:p:585-596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.