IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v72y2017icp439-444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process optimization and study of biogas fermentation with a mixture of duck manure and straw

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Enhai
  • Liu, Shengyong

Abstract

The agricultural production process generated a lot of straw and other agricultural waste, reasonable use of this part of the biomass energy, which can effectively alleviate part of the energy problem. Taking the poultry feeding industry in the Central Chinese Economic District as a research object, a fermentation test on the mixed raw materials of duck manure and straw was conducted to regulate the proportion of fermenting materials so as to explore their biogas production characteristics. Based on the gas generation rate and cumulative gas production of these mixed raw materials in different proportions and using contrasting tests between fermentation materials mixed to different proportions, the research found that the factors affecting fermentation is temperature followed by inoculation concentration and the concentration of fermentation broth. In view of the factors affecting fermentation with the mixture of duck manure and straw, and the cumulative gas production from raw material mixed in different proportions, optimum temperature for mixed anaerobic fermentation is about 30°C and the optimum proportion of raw materials is 2.8:1.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Enhai & Liu, Shengyong, 2017. "Process optimization and study of biogas fermentation with a mixture of duck manure and straw," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 439-444.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:72:y:2017:i:c:p:439-444
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117300175
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noorollahi, Younes & Kheirrouz, Mehdi & Asl, Hadi Farabi & Yousefi, Hossein & Hajinezhad, Ahmad, 2015. "Biogas production potential from livestock manure in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 748-754.
    2. Rouches, E. & Herpoël-Gimbert, I. & Steyer, J.P. & Carrere, H., 2016. "Improvement of anaerobic degradation by white-rot fungi pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 179-198.
    3. Singh, Jaswinder, 2016. "Identifying an economic power production system based on agricultural straw on regional basis in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1140-1155.
    4. Mao, Guozhu & Liu, Xi & Du, Huibin & Zuo, Jian & Wang, Linyuan, 2015. "Way forward for alternative energy research: A bibliometric analysis during 1994–2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 276-286.
    5. Nygaard, Ivan & Dembelé, Filifing & Daou, Ibrahima & Mariko, Adama & Kamissoko, Famakan & Coulibaly, Nanourou & Borgstrøm, Rasmus L. & Bruun, Thilde Beck, 2016. "Lignocellulosic residues for production of electricity, biogas or second generation biofuel: A case study of technical and sustainable potential of rice straw in Mali," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 202-212.
    6. Iddrisu, Insah & Bhattacharyya, Subhes C., 2015. "Sustainable Energy Development Index: A multi-dimensional indicator for measuring sustainable energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 513-530.
    7. Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Bakonyi, Péter & Kobayashi, Takuro & Xu, Kai-Qin & Sivagurunathan, Periyasamy & Kim, Sang-Hyoun & Buitrón, Germán & Nemestóthy, Nándor & Bélafi-Bakó, Katalin, 2016. "Enhancement of biofuel production via microbial augmentation: The case of dark fermentative hydrogen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 879-891.
    8. Ghadiryanfar, Mohsen & Rosentrater, Kurt A. & Keyhani, Alireza & Omid, Mahmoud, 2016. "A review of macroalgae production, with potential applications in biofuels and bioenergy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 473-481.
    9. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Cichosz, Marcin, 2015. "Biogas production in Poland—Current state, potential and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 686-695.
    10. Ali, Ghaffar & Nitivattananon, Vilas & Abbas, Sawaid & Sabir, Muazzam, 2012. "Green waste to biogas: Renewable energy possibilities for Thailand's green markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5423-5429.
    11. Mao, Guozhu & Zou, Hongyang & Chen, Guanyi & Du, Huibin & Zuo, Jian, 2015. "Past, current and future of biomass energy research: A bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1823-1833.
    12. Ali, Ghaffar & Bashir, Muhammad Khalid & Ali, Hassan & Bashir, Muhammad Hamid, 2016. "Utilization of rice husk and poultry wastes for renewable energy potential in Pakistan: An economic perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 25-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali, Ghaffar & Bashir, Muhammad Khalid & Ali, Hassan & Bashir, Muhammad Hamid, 2016. "Utilization of rice husk and poultry wastes for renewable energy potential in Pakistan: An economic perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 25-29.
    2. Loh, S.K. & Nasrin, A.B. & Mohamad Azri, S. & Nurul Adela, B. & Muzzammil, N. & Daryl Jay, T. & Stasha Eleanor, R.A. & Lim, W.S. & Choo, Y.M. & Kaltschmitt, M., 2017. "First Report on Malaysia’s experiences and development in biogas capture and utilization from palm oil mill effluent under the Economic Transformation Programme: Current and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1257-1274.
    3. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    4. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    5. Safieddin Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad, 2020. "Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 29-37.
    6. Wenjie Zhang & Hongping Yuan, 2019. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Energy Performance Contracting Research from 2008 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Dutra, Luciana da Silva & Costa Cerqueira Pinto, Martina & Cipolatti, Eliane Pereira & Aguieiras, Erika Cristina G. & Manoel, Evelin Andrade & Greco-Duarte, Jaqueline & Guimarães Freire, Denise Maria , 2022. "How the biodiesel from immobilized enzymes production is going on: An advanced bibliometric evaluation of global research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Alsaleh, Mohd & Abdul-Rahim, A.S. & Mohd-Shahwahid, H.O., 2017. "An empirical and forecasting analysis of the bioenergy market in the EU28 region: Evidence from a panel data simultaneous equation model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1123-1137.
    9. Shaheen, Sabry M. & Antoniadis, Vasileios & Shahid, Muhammad & Yang, Yi & Abdelrahman, Hamada & Zhang, Tao & Hassan, Noha E.E. & Bibi, Irshad & Niazi, Nabeel Khan & Younis, Sherif A. & Almazroui, Mans, 2022. "Sustainable applications of rice feedstock in agro-environmental and construction sectors: A global perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    10. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Haider, Junaid & Qadeer, Kinza & Valentina, Valentina & Khan, Amin & Yasin, Muhammad & Aslam, Muhammad & De Guido, Giorgia & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lee, Moonyong, 2020. "Biogas to liquefied biomethane: Assessment of 3P's–Production, processing, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Gao, Cuixia & Sun, Mei & Geng, Yong & Wu, Rui & Chen, Wei, 2016. "A bibliometric analysis based review on wind power price," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 602-612.
    12. Loganath, Radhakrishnan & Senophiyah-Mary, J., 2020. "Critical review on the necessity of bioelectricity generation from slaughterhouse industry waste and wastewater using different anaerobic digestion reactors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Wang, Yuan & Lai, Nan & Zuo, Jian & Chen, Guanyi & Du, Huibin, 2016. "Characteristics and trends of research on waste-to-energy incineration: A bibliometric analysis, 1999–2015," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 95-104.
    14. Deming Lin & Tianhui Gong & Wenbin Liu & Martin Meyer, 2020. "An entropy-based measure for the evolution of h index research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2283-2298, December.
    15. Arshad, Muhammad & Bano, Ijaz & Khan, Nasrullah & Shahzad, Mirza Imran & Younus, Muhammad & Abbas, Mazhar & Iqbal, Munawar, 2018. "Electricity generation from biogas of poultry waste: An assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1241-1246.
    16. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    17. Patrizio, P. & Leduc, S. & Chinese, D. & Kraxner, F., 2017. "Internalizing the external costs of biogas supply chains in the Italian energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 85-96.
    18. Zareei, Samira, 2018. "Project scheduling for constructing biogas plant using critical path method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 756-759.
    19. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    20. Kirchhoff, Hannes & Strunz, Kai, 2019. "Key drivers for successful development of peer-to-peer microgrids for swarm electrification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 46-62.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:72:y:2017:i:c:p:439-444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.