IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v40y2014icp798-805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The competition situation analysis of shale gas industry in China: Applying Porter’s five forces and scenario model

Author

Listed:
  • Yunna, Wu
  • Yisheng, Yang

Abstract

With the increasing of energy demand and environmental pressure, China government has been exploring a way to diversify energy supply. Shale gas development is becoming an important energy strategy in China in recent years due to giant shale gas reserves. However, the shale gas market is preliminarily shaping in China, so that many factors have great influence on its competition. To find these factors and to control them rationally is good for the cultivating Chinese shale gas market. Five forces model for industry analysis puts an insight into the competitive landscape of shale gas market by showing the forces of supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitution, barriers to entry, and degree of rivalry. Illustrating the key factors that affect competitive landscape provides a view into the situation of shale gas industry. The variation tendency of shale gas industry is analyzed by setting various scenarios. Finally some suggestions are proposed in order to keep the development of shale gas industry positively.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunna, Wu & Yisheng, Yang, 2014. "The competition situation analysis of shale gas industry in China: Applying Porter’s five forces and scenario model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 798-805.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:40:y:2014:i:c:p:798-805
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114006911
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnson, Corey & Boersma, Tim, 2013. "Energy (in)security in Poland the case of shale gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 389-399.
    2. Jeff Tollefson, 2013. "China slow to tap shale-gas bonanza," Nature, Nature, vol. 494(7437), pages 294-294, February.
    3. Guangming Zeng & Ming Chen & Zhuotong Zeng, 2013. "Shale gas: Surface water also at risk," Nature, Nature, vol. 499(7457), pages 154-154, July.
    4. Chen, Shangbin & Zhu, Yanming & Wang, Hongyan & Liu, Honglin & Wei, Wei & Fang, Junhua, 2011. "Shale gas reservoir characterisation: A typical case in the southern Sichuan Basin of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6609-6616.
    5. Hong Yang & Roger J. Flower & Julian R. Thompson, 2013. "Shale gas: Pollution fears in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 499(7457), pages 154-154, July.
    6. Hu, Desheng & Xu, Shengqing, 2013. "Opportunity, challenges and policy choices for China on the development of shale gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 21-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. da Costa Lima Pires, Pâmela & da Silva César, Aldara & Cardoso, Alexandre Nunes & Favaro, Simone Palma & Conejero, Marco Antonio, 2023. "Strategies to improve the competitiveness of an agroindustrial system for a macauba based oil production in Minas Gerais State, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Hafezi, Reza & Akhavan, AmirNaser & Pakseresht, Saeed & Wood, David A., 2019. "A Layered Uncertainties Scenario Synthesizing (LUSS) model applied to evaluate multiple potential long-run outcomes for Iran's natural gas exports," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 646-659.
    3. Hafezi, Reza & Akhavan, AmirNaser & Pakseresht, Saeed & A. Wood, David, 2021. "Global natural gas demand to 2025: A learning scenario development model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Ajit Singh & Andrew Gill & David Lian Keong Lim & Agustina Kasmaruddin & Taghi Miri & Anita Chakrabarty & Hui Hui Chai & Anurita Selvarajoo & Festo Massawe & Yousif Abdalla Abakr & Kumbirai Ivyne Mate, 2022. "Feasibility of Bio-Coal Production from Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) Technology Using Food Waste in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Wang, Qiang & Zhan, Lina, 2019. "Assessing the sustainability of the shale gas industry by combining DPSIRM model and RAGA-PP techniques: An empirical analysis of Sichuan and Chongqing, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 353-364.
    6. Alipour, M. & Hafezi, R. & Amer, M. & Akhavan, A.N., 2017. "A new hybrid fuzzy cognitive map-based scenario planning approach for Iran's oil production pathways in the post–sanction period," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 851-864.
    7. Hafezi, Reza & Wood, David A. & Akhavan, Amir Naser & Pakseresht, Saeed, 2020. "Iran in the emerging global natural gas market: A scenario-based competitive analysis and policy assessment," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Li, Yanbin & Li, Yun & Wang, Bingqian & Chen, Zhuoer & Nie, Dan, 2016. "The status quo review and suggested policies for shale gas development in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 420-428.
    9. Reddy, K.S. & Xie, En, 2017. "Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by oil and gas multinational enterprises: Geography-based view of energy strategy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 961-980.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Zhengwei & Pi, Guanglin & Dong, Xiucheng & Chen, Chi, 2017. "The situation analysis of shale gas development in China-based on Structural Equation Modeling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1300-1307.
    2. Zou, Youqin & Yang, Changbing & Wu, Daishe & Yan, Chun & Zeng, Masun & Lan, Yingying & Dai, Zhenxue, 2016. "Probabilistic assessment of shale gas production and water demand at Xiuwu Basin in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 185-195.
    3. Li, Yanbin & Li, Yun & Wang, Bingqian & Chen, Zhuoer & Nie, Dan, 2016. "The status quo review and suggested policies for shale gas development in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 420-428.
    4. Guanglin Pi & Xiucheng Dong & Cong Dong & Jie Guo & Zhengwei Ma, 2015. "The Status, Obstacles and Policy Recommendations of Shale Gas Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Yunna, Wu & Kaifeng, Chen & Yisheng, Yang & Tiantian, Feng, 2015. "A system dynamics analysis of technology, cost and policy that affect the market competition of shale gas in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 235-243.
    6. Chang, Yuan & Huang, Runze & Ries, Robert J. & Masanet, Eric, 2015. "Life-cycle comparison of greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption for coal and shale gas fired power generation in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 335-343.
    7. Yang, Yan & Wang, Limao & Fang, Yebing & Mou, Chufu, 2017. "Integrated value of shale gas development: A comparative analysis in the United States and China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1465-1478.
    8. Philipp M. Richter, 2015. "From Boom to Bust? A Critical Look at US Shale Gas Projections," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    9. Ren, Jingzheng & Tan, Shiyu & Goodsite, Michael Evan & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Dong, Lichun, 2015. "Sustainability, shale gas, and energy transition in China: Assessing barriers and prioritizing strategic measures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 551-562.
    10. Turgut Bayramoğlu & Yilmaz Onur Ari̇, 2015. "The Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Production Of Shale Gas Potential: The Case Of Turkey," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 3(2), pages 4-11, November.
    11. Yin, Hong & Zhou, Junping & Xian, Xuefu & Jiang, Yongdong & Lu, Zhaohui & Tan, Jingqiang & Liu, Guojun, 2017. "Experimental study of the effects of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation on the mechanical characteristics of organic-rich shales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 84-95.
    12. Chen, Junqing & Jiang, Fujie & Cong, Qi & Pang, Xiongqi & Ma, Kuiyou & Shi, Kanyuan & Pang, Bo & Chen, Dongxia & Pang, Hong & Yang, Xiaobin & Wang, Yuying & Li, Bingyao, 2023. "Adsorption characteristics of shale gas in organic–inorganic slit pores," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    13. Bai, Yang & Meng, Jie & Meng, Fanyi & Fang, Guochang, 2020. "Stochastic analysis of a shale gas investment strategy for coping with production uncertainties," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Zhou, Junping & Tian, Shifeng & Zhou, Lei & Xian, Xuefu & Yang, Kang & Jiang, Yongdong & Zhang, Chengpeng & Guo, Yaowen, 2020. "Experimental investigation on the influence of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation time on the permeability of fractured shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Zhiyao Zhang & Shang Xu & Qiyang Gou & Qiqi Li, 2022. "Reservoir Characteristics and Resource Potential of Marine Shale in South China: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Shengqing Xu & Tao Wang, 2017. "On energy equity and China’s policy choices," Energy & Environment, , vol. 28(3), pages 288-301, May.
    17. Kuchler, Magdalena & Höök, Mikael, 2020. "Fractured visions: Anticipating (un)conventional natural gas in Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Zhongmin Wang & Qing Xue, 2016. "The Market Structure of Shale Gas Drilling in the United States," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(2), pages 793-801.
    19. Yuanyuan Tian & Qing Chen & Changhui Yan & Hongde Chen & Yanqing He & Yufeng He, 2022. "A New Adsorption Equation for Nano-Porous Shale Rocks and Its Application in Pore Size Distribution Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Gou, Qiyang & Xu, Shang & Hao, Fang & Yang, Feng & Shu, Zhiguo & Liu, Rui, 2021. "The effect of tectonic deformation and preservation condition on the shale pore structure using adsorption-based textural quantification and 3D image observation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:40:y:2014:i:c:p:798-805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.