IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v25y2013icp462-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of reference state on the exergoeconomic evaluation of geothermal district heating systems

Author

Listed:
  • Keçebaş, Ali

Abstract

The exergy cost structure of the geothermal district heating system (GDHS) is investigated by using an exergoeconomic method called as the modified productive structure analysis (MOPSA). A parametric study is also conducted to show how exergy cost flow rates change with the reference state (ambient temperature). As a comprehensive case study, the Afyon GDHS in Afyonkarahisar, Turkey is considered. The actual thermal data taken from the technical staffs as 2.3°C for January (case 1) and 10.2°C for February (case 2), 2010 in 100% load condition are collected for this study. Mechanical and thermal exergy flow rates, entropy production rates and exergy cost flow rates for each component in the Afyon GDHS are calculated using these two actual data sets. The results show that the exergy efficiencies of the overall system for these two cases are found to be 25.34% and 22.78%, respectively. And, the largest exergy cost loss occurs in the heat exchangers with 52.49% and 64.91% for cases 1 and 2, respectively. The unit exergy costs are found as cP>cT>cS>cQ for the actual data sets in each case. In addition, ambient temperature has a big impact on the exergies and costs of GDHSs.

Suggested Citation

  • Keçebaş, Ali, 2013. "Effect of reference state on the exergoeconomic evaluation of geothermal district heating systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 462-469.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:25:y:2013:i:c:p:462-469
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032113003213
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Si-Moon & Oh†, Si-Doek & Kwon, Yong-Ho & Kwak, Ho-Young, 1998. "Exergoeconomic analysis of thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 393-406.
    2. Arslan, Oguz, 2011. "Power generation from medium temperature geothermal resources: ANN-based optimization of Kalina cycle system-34," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2528-2534.
    3. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    4. Frick, Stephanie & Kaltschmitt, Martin & Schröder, Gerd, 2010. "Life cycle assessment of geothermal binary power plants using enhanced low-temperature reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2281-2294.
    5. Coskun, C. & Oktay, Z. & Dincer, I., 2011. "Modified exergoeconomic modeling of geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6358-6366.
    6. Lozano, M.A. & Valero, A., 1993. "Theory of the exergetic cost," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 939-960.
    7. Franco, Alessandro & Vaccaro, Maurizio, 2012. "An integrated “Reservoir-Plant” strategy for a sustainable and efficient use of geothermal resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 299-310.
    8. Afgan, Naim H. & Gobaisi, Darwish Al & Carvalho, Maria G. & Cumo, Maurizio, 1998. "Sustainable energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 235-286, September.
    9. Kwak, H.-Y. & Kim, D.-J. & Jeon, J.-S., 2003. "Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 343-360.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coskun, C. & Oktay, Z. & Dincer, I., 2011. "Modified exergoeconomic modeling of geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6358-6366.
    2. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    3. Abusoglu, Aysegul & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2009. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2295-2308, December.
    4. Seyyedi, Seyyed Masoud & Ajam, Hossein & Farahat, Said, 2010. "A new criterion for the allocation of residues cost in exergoeconomic analysis of energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3474-3482.
    5. Gerber, Léda & Maréchal, François, 2012. "Environomic optimal configurations of geothermal energy conversion systems: Application to the future construction of Enhanced Geothermal Systems in Switzerland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 908-923.
    6. Oh, Si-Doek & Lee, Yeji & Yoo, Yungpil & Kim, Jinoh & Kim, Suyong & Song, Seung Jin & Kwak, Ho-Young, 2013. "A support strategy for the promotion of photovoltaic uses for residential houses in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 248-256.
    7. Sahu, Mithilesh Kumar & Sanjay,, 2017. "Comparative exergoeconomics of power utilities: Air-cooled gas turbine cycle and combined cycle configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 42-51.
    8. Kwak, H.-Y. & Kim, D.-J. & Jeon, J.-S., 2003. "Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 343-360.
    9. Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Amidpour, M., 2012. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of an ammonia–water power/cooling cogeneration cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 271-283.
    10. Khoa, T.D. & Shuhaimi, M. & Hashim, H. & Panjeshahi, M.H., 2010. "Optimal design of distillation column using three dimensional exergy analysis curves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5309-5319.
    11. Unverdi, Murat & Cerci, Yunus, 2013. "Performance analysis of Germencik Geothermal Power Plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 192-200.
    12. Michał Kaczmarczyk & Barbara Tomaszewska & Agnieszka Operacz, 2020. "Sustainable Utilization of Low Enthalpy Geothermal Resources to Electricity Generation through a Cascade System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Fábrega, F.M. & Rossi, J.S. & d'Angelo, J.V.H., 2010. "Exergetic analysis of the refrigeration system in ethylene and propylene production process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1224-1231.
    14. Guerrero-Martínez, Fernando J. & Verma, Surendra P., 2013. "Three dimensional temperature simulation from cooling of two magma chambers in the Las Tres Vírgenes geothermal field, Baja California Sur, Mexico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 110-118.
    15. Jung, Jung-Yeul & Lee, Ho Saeng & Kim, Hyeon-Ju & Yoo, Yungpil & Choi, Woo-Young & Kwak, Ho-Young, 2016. "Thermoeconomic analysis of an ocean thermal energy conversion plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1086-1094.
    16. Sahu, Mithilesh Kumar & Sanjay,, 2017. "Thermoeconomic investigation of power utilities: Intercooled recuperated gas turbine cycle featuring cooled turbine blades," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 490-499.
    17. Guelpa, Elisa & Verda, Vittorio, 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis for the design improvement of supercritical CO2 cycle in concentrated solar plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    18. Liu, Qiang & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2013. "Performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles with selected hydrocarbon working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 123-132.
    19. Maes, Dries & Van Passel, Steven, 2012. "Interference of regional support policies on the economic and environmental performance of a hybrid cogeneration-solar panel energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 670-680.
    20. Cardona, E. & Piacentino, A., 2006. "A new approach to exergoeconomic analysis and design of variable demand energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 490-515.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:25:y:2013:i:c:p:462-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.