IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v207y2025ics1364032124007081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A meta-analysis of pathogen reduction data in anaerobic digestion

Author

Listed:
  • Álvarez-Fraga, Laura
  • Capson-Tojo, Gabriel
  • Sanglier, Malo
  • Hamelin, Jérôme
  • Escudié, Renaud
  • Wéry, Nathalie
  • García-Bernet, Diana
  • Battimelli, Audrey
  • Guilayn, Felipe

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD)-derived digestate can be used as an organic fertilizer or for soil amendment. However, its utilization for resource recovery raises valid biosafety concerns. Despite extensive research on the capacity of AD for pathogen reduction, the variability in results poses challenges for drawing definitive conclusions. To address this lack of unification, results from 121 scientific articles were compiled, and a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted. Findings indicate that artificial pathogen spiking leads to performance overestimation. Current most common indicators represent accurately their respective microbial groups. Clostridiaceae are barely affected by AD and may be favored by some pre-treatment technologies. The impact of operational parameters and the coupling of pre- and post-treatments with AD on pathogen reduction was also investigated. While an optimal batch duration was identified, the hydraulic retention time in (semi)continuous systems did not affect the overall pathogen reduction. Heat-based post-treatments coupled with thermophilic AD resulted in the highest pathogen reductions, fulfilling legislations. Unprecedented statistical analyses allowed categorizing quantitatively key parameters. Results confirmed that temperature is the most relevant parameter. Thermophilic conditions resulted in the highest pathogen reductions, while psychrophilic and mesophilic temperatures showed similar performances. The impact of pH on pathogen removal was confirmed, with acidic and basic values enhancing pathogen reductions. More research considering all AD products within a multicriteria optimization approach (e.g., pathogen reduction, biogas production, and digestate quality) is needed to determine optimal conditions considering all aspects. This study provides novel and relevant conclusions for AD at research and industrial scale, drawing several R&D perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Álvarez-Fraga, Laura & Capson-Tojo, Gabriel & Sanglier, Malo & Hamelin, Jérôme & Escudié, Renaud & Wéry, Nathalie & García-Bernet, Diana & Battimelli, Audrey & Guilayn, Felipe, 2025. "A meta-analysis of pathogen reduction data in anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:207:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124007081
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007081
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Y. & Xie, S.H. & Dennehy, C. & Lawlor, P.G. & Hu, Z.H. & Wu, G.X. & Zhan, X.M. & Gardiner, G.E., 2020. "Inactivation of pathogens in anaerobic digestion systems for converting biowastes to bioenergy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rose Daphnee Tchonkouang & Helen Onyeaka & Taghi Miri, 2023. "From Waste to Plate: Exploring the Impact of Food Waste Valorisation on Achieving Zero Hunger," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Christy Echakachi Manyi-Loh & Anthony Ifeanyin Okoh & Ryk Lues, 2023. "Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria (Enteropathogens) Recovered from a Blend of Pig Manure and Pinewood Saw Dust during Anaerobic Co-Digestion in a Steel Biodigester," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Bi, Shaojie & Wang, Chunshuang & Wang, Haipeng & Du, Yanli & Yu, Xinhui & Wang, Yanjie, 2024. "Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: Focusing on methanogenic performance and pathogens removal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Beugre, Etienne Yves-Martial & Gnagne, Théophile, 2024. "Viscosity influence on kinetics parameters in dry anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    5. Campo, Giuseppe & Cerutti, Alberto & Zanetti, Mariachiara & De Ceglia, Margherita & Scibilia, Gerardo & Ruffino, Barbara, 2023. "A modelling approach for the assessment of energy recovery and impact on the water line of sludge pre-treatments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    6. Xiaojun Liu & Thomas Lendormi & Jean-Louis Lanoisellé, 2021. "Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization, Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Ma, Guiling & Chen, Yanting & Ndegwa, Pius, 2022. "Anaerobic digestion process deactivates major pathogens in biowaste: A meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Wang, Zhongzhong & Hu, Yuansheng & Wang, Shun & Wu, Guangxue & Zhan, Xinmin, 2023. "A critical review on dry anaerobic digestion of organic waste: Characteristics, operational conditions, and improvement strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Usmani, Zeba & Sharma, Minaxi & Karpichev, Yevgen & Pandey, Ashok & Chander Kuhad, Ramesh & Bhat, Rajeev & Punia, Rajesh & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Gupta, Vijai Kumar, 2020. "Advancement in valorization technologies to improve utilization of bio-based waste in bioeconomy context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:207:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124007081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.