IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v207y2025ics1364032124006208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing offshore wind farms compatibilities and conflicts with marine conservation through the application of modelled benchmarking scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Couce Montero, L.
  • Abramic, A.
  • Guerra Marrero, A.
  • Espino Ruano, A.
  • Jiménez Alvarado, D.
  • Castro Hernández, José J.

Abstract

Offshore wind power generation structures are scheduled for development in the Canary Islands, potentially resulting in spatial overlap with various maritime activities, particularly fishing. It is crucial to point out that some areas that are considered suitable for installing these structures are in protected zones that are part of the Natura 2000 network, and do not have any prior environmental impact assessments. The research delved into the efficacy of utilizing Ecopath with Ecosim software to examine the consequences of implementing this technology in the study area, employing an ecosystem-based approach. To address this question, simulations were executed by assessing three distinct scenarios. The results suggest that there would be changes in the distribution of keystone species such as top predators, alongside a conspicuous decline in the abundance and catches of target species of the fishery. The Ecospace model holds the potential to forecast the impacts of offshore wind installations; however, crucial factors must be carefully considered, such as the lack of information. Notwithstanding the constraints, research like this demonstrates the efficacy of spatial ecosystem modelling in exploring this issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Couce Montero, L. & Abramic, A. & Guerra Marrero, A. & Espino Ruano, A. & Jiménez Alvarado, D. & Castro Hernández, José J., 2025. "Addressing offshore wind farms compatibilities and conflicts with marine conservation through the application of modelled benchmarking scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:207:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124006208
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124006208
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114894?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:207:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124006208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.