IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v202y2024ics1364032124004143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accelerating integrated prediction, analysis and targeted optimization for anaerobic digestion of biomass after hydrothermal pretreatment using automated machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yi
  • Yang, Xingru
  • Feng, Yijing
  • Dai, Zhiyue
  • Jing, Zhangmu
  • Li, Yeqing
  • Feng, Lu
  • Hao, Yanji
  • Yu, Shasha
  • Zhang, Weijin
  • Lu, Yanjuan
  • Xu, Chunming
  • Pan, Junting

Abstract

Exploring the complex mechanism of anaerobic digestion with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTAD) for biomass efficiently and optimising the reaction conditions are critical to improving the performance of methane production. This study used H2O automated machine learning (AutoML) for comprehensive prediction, analysis, and targeted optimization of the HTAD system. An IterativeImputer system for data filling was constructed. The comparison of three basic regressors showed that random forest performed optimally for filling (R2 > 0.95). The gradient boosting machine (GBM) model was searched by H2O AutoML to show optimal performance in prediction (R2 > 0.96). The software was developed based on the GBM model, and two prediction schemes were devised. The generalization error of the software was less than 10%. The Shapley Additive exPlanations value showed that solid to liquid ratio, hydrothermal pretreatment (HT) temperature, and particle size have greater potential for improving cumulative methane production (CMP). A Bayesian-HTAD optimization strategy was devised, using the Bayesian optimization to directionally optimize the reaction conditions, and performing experiments to validate the results. The experimental results showed that the CMP was significantly improved by 51.63%. Compared to the response surface methodology, the Bayesian optimization relatively achieved a 2.21–2.50 times greater effect. Mechanism analyses targeting the experiments showed that HT was conducive to improving the relative abundance of Sphaerochaeta, Methanosaeta, and Methanosarcina. This research achieved accurate prediction and targeted optimization for the HTAD system and proposed multiple filling, prediction, and optimization strategies, which are expected to provide an AutoML optimization paradigm for anaerobic digestion in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yi & Yang, Xingru & Feng, Yijing & Dai, Zhiyue & Jing, Zhangmu & Li, Yeqing & Feng, Lu & Hao, Yanji & Yu, Shasha & Zhang, Weijin & Lu, Yanjuan & Xu, Chunming & Pan, Junting, 2024. "Accelerating integrated prediction, analysis and targeted optimization for anaerobic digestion of biomass after hydrothermal pretreatment using automated machine learning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:202:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124004143
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124004143
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114688?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmad, Fiaz & Silva, Edson Luiz & Varesche, Maria Bernadete Amâncio, 2018. "Hydrothermal processing of biomass for anaerobic digestion – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 108-124.
    2. David L. McCollum, 2021. "Machine learning for energy projections," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 121-122, February.
    3. Adl, Mehrdad & Sheng, Kuichuan & Gharibi, Arash, 2012. "Technical assessment of bioenergy recovery from cotton stalks through anaerobic digestion process and the effects of inexpensive pre-treatments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 251-260.
    4. Qiao, Wei & Yan, Xiuyi & Ye, Junhui & Sun, Yifei & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Zhongzhi, 2011. "Evaluation of biogas production from different biomass wastes with/without hydrothermal pretreatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3313-3318.
    5. Thirunavukkarasu, M. & Sawle, Yashwant & Lala, Himadri, 2023. "A comprehensive review on optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems using various optimization techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Hashemi, Seyed Sajad & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora, 2019. "Hydrothermal pretreatment of safflower straw to enhance biogas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 545-554.
    7. Sambusiti, C. & Monlau, F. & Ficara, E. & Carrère, H. & Malpei, F., 2013. "A comparison of different pre-treatments to increase methane production from two agricultural substrates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 62-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Bing & Lin, Richen & Lam, Chun Ho & Wu, Hao & Tsui, To-Hung & Yu, Yun, 2021. "Recent advances and challenges of inter-disciplinary biomass valorization by integrating hydrothermal and biological techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Meneses-Quelal Orlando & Velázquez-Martí Borja, 2020. "Pretreatment of Animal Manure Biomass to Improve Biogas Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Scherzinger, Marvin & Kaltschmitt, Martin, 2021. "Thermal pre-treatment options to enhance anaerobic digestibility – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Li, Yue & Chen, Yinguang & Wu, Jiang, 2019. "Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 120-137.
    5. Ahmad, Fiaz & Silva, Edson Luiz & Varesche, Maria Bernadete Amâncio, 2018. "Hydrothermal processing of biomass for anaerobic digestion – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 108-124.
    6. Al Afif, Rafat & Wendland, Martin & Amon, Thomas & Pfeifer, Christoph, 2020. "Supercritical carbon dioxide enhanced pre-treatment of cotton stalks for methane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    7. Małgorzata Fugol & Hubert Prask & Józef Szlachta & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Marta Pasławska & Szymon Szufa, 2023. "Improving the Energetic Efficiency of Biogas Plants Using Enzymatic Additives to Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-12, February.
    8. Bateni, Hamed & Karimi, Keikhosro & Zamani, Akram & Benakashani, Fatemeh, 2014. "Castor plant for biodiesel, biogas, and ethanol production with a biorefinery processing perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 14-22.
    9. M'Arimi, M.M. & Mecha, C.A. & Kiprop, A.K. & Ramkat, R., 2020. "Recent trends in applications of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in bioenergy production: Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    10. Primaz, Carmem T. & Ribes-Greus, Amparo & Jacques, Rosângela A., 2021. "Valorization of cotton residues for production of bio-oil and engineered biochar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    11. Jia, Jiandong & Li, Haiqiao & Wu, Di & Guo, Jiacheng & Jiang, Leilei & Fan, Zeming, 2024. "Multi-objective optimization study of regional integrated energy systems coupled with renewable energy, energy storage, and inter-station energy sharing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    12. de Sousa e Silva, Amanda & Lima Moraes dos Santos, Amanda & Cavalcante Malveira, Isabele Clara & Holanda Albano Girão, Bianca & Bezerra dos Santos, André, 2024. "Effect of thermo-alkaline pretreatment and substrate inoculum ratio on methane production from dry and semi-dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    13. Ahmad, Tanveer & Madonski, Rafal & Zhang, Dongdong & Huang, Chao & Mujeeb, Asad, 2022. "Data-driven probabilistic machine learning in sustainable smart energy/smart energy systems: Key developments, challenges, and future research opportunities in the context of smart grid paradigm," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Bidart, Christian & Fröhling, Magnus & Schultmann, Frank, 2014. "Electricity and substitute natural gas generation from the conversion of wastewater treatment plant sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 404-413.
    15. Mustafa Tahir & Sideng Hu & Haoqi Zhu, 2024. "Advanced Levelized Cost Evaluation Method for Electric Vehicle Stations Concurrently Producing Electricity and Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Ji, Qinghua & Jiang, Haonan & Yu, Xiaojie & Yagoub, Abu El-Gasim A. & Zhou, Cunshan & Chen, Li, 2020. "Efficient and environmentally-friendly dehydration of fructose and treatments of bagasse under the supercritical CO2 system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-12.
    17. Monlau, F. & Sambusiti, C. & Antoniou, N. & Barakat, A. & Zabaniotou, A., 2015. "A new concept for enhancing energy recovery from agricultural residues by coupling anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 32-38.
    18. Avaci, Angelica Buzinaro & Melegari de Souza, Samuel Nelson & Werncke, Ivan & Chaves, Luiz Inácio, 2013. "Financial economic scenario for the microgeneration of electric energy from swine culture-originated biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 272-276.
    19. Wang, Bo & Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Nepal, Rabindra, 2024. "How does artificial intelligence affect high-quality energy development? Achieving a clean energy transition society," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    20. Christine Peyrelasse & Abdellatif Barakat & Camille Lagnet & Prasad Kaparaju & Florian Monlau, 2021. "Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Sludge and Alkaline-Pretreated Wheat Straw at Semi-Continuous Pilot Scale: Performances and Energy Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:202:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124004143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.