IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v34y2009i12p2852-2859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Available exhaust gas power in different configurations in a pellet stove plant

Author

Listed:
  • Granada, E.
  • Patiño, D.
  • Collazo, J.
  • Moran, J.C.
  • Porteiro, J.

Abstract

With a view to finding the best configuration for a small cogeneration system based on the pellet combustion process, exergetic analysis was applied to a small pellet stove. The evaluation focuses on fume exergetic content for power generation purposes. Preheated air, secondary air, fume recirculation and basis configurations were studied. Global exergetic calculation was developed at these configurations based on experimental correlations of energy and emissions. The influences of the pellet feeding rate, excess air, secondary air and fume recirculation were studied. The results for multiple configurations are discussed and the best one is presented. Results show that CO emissions have a major influence on fume exergetic content, although if emissions diminish only a slight thermomechanical exergetic efficiency increase is expected.

Suggested Citation

  • Granada, E. & Patiño, D. & Collazo, J. & Moran, J.C. & Porteiro, J., 2009. "Available exhaust gas power in different configurations in a pellet stove plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2852-2859.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:34:y:2009:i:12:p:2852-2859
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.04.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148109001530
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2009.04.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koroneos, Christopher & Spachos, Thomas & Moussiopoulos, Nikolaos, 2003. "Exergy analysis of renewable energy sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 295-310.
    2. Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2005. "Thermodynamic aspects of renewables and sustainable development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 169-189, April.
    3. Podesser, Erich, 1999. "Electricity production in rural villages with a biomass Stirling engine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1049-1052.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Granada, E. & Eguía, P. & Vilan, J.A. & Comesaña, J.A. & Comesaña, R., 2012. "FTIR quantitative analysis technique for gases. Application in a biomass thermochemical process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 416-421.
    2. Collazo, Joaquín & Pazó, José Antonio & Granada, Enrique & Saavedra, Ángeles & Eguía, Pablo, 2012. "Determination of the specific heat of biomass materials and the combustion energy of coke by DSC analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 746-752.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hepbasli, Arif & Alsuhaibani, Zeyad, 2011. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic aspects of wind energy systems in achieving sustainable development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2810-2825, August.
    2. Rubio Rodríguez, M.A. & Ruyck, J. De & Díaz, P. Roque & Verma, V.K. & Bram, S., 2011. "An LCA based indicator for evaluation of alternative energy routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 630-635, March.
    3. Cho, Honghyun, 2015. "Comparative study on the performance and exergy efficiency of a solar hybrid heat pump using R22 and R744," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1267-1276.
    4. Vassiliades, C. & Savvides, A. & Buonomano, A., 2022. "Building integration of active solar energy systems for façades renovation in the urban fabric: Effects on the thermal comfort in outdoor public spaces in Naples and Thessaloniki," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 30-47.
    5. Nielsen, S.N. & Müller, F., 2009. "Understanding the functional principles of nature—Proposing another type of ecosystem services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(16), pages 1913-1925.
    6. van der Kroon, Bianca & Brouwer, Roy & van Beukering, Pieter J.H., 2013. "The energy ladder: Theoretical myth or empirical truth? Results from a meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 504-513.
    7. Stanek, Wojciech & Simla, Tomasz & Gazda, Wiesław, 2019. "Exergetic and thermo-ecological assessment of heat pump supported by electricity from renewable sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 404-412.
    8. E, Jiaqiang & Pham, MinhHieu & Deng, Yuanwang & Nguyen, Tuannghia & Duy, VinhNguyen & Le, DucHieu & Zuo, Wei & Peng, Qingguo & Zhang, Zhiqing, 2018. "Effects of injection timing and injection pressure on performance and exhaust emissions of a common rail diesel engine fueled by various concentrations of fish-oil biodiesel blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 979-989.
    9. Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz & Magdalena Zioło & Marek Dylewski, 2021. "Dynamic Analysis of the Similarity of Objects in Research on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Baskut, Omer & Ozgener, Onder & Ozgener, Leyla, 2010. "Effects of meteorological variables on exergetic efficiency of wind turbine power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3237-3241, December.
    12. Ahmed, Shamsuddin & Islam, Md Tasbirul & Karim, Mohd Aminul & Karim, Nissar Mohammad, 2014. "Exploitation of renewable energy for sustainable development and overcoming power crisis in Bangladesh," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 223-235.
    13. BoroumandJazi, G. & Saidur, R. & Rismanchi, B. & Mekhilef, S., 2012. "A review on the relation between the energy and exergy efficiency analysis and the technical characteristic of the renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3131-3135.
    14. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    15. Zmeureanu, Radu & Yu Wu, Xin, 2007. "Energy and exergy performance of residential heating systems with separate mechanical ventilation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 187-195.
    16. Ranjan, K.R. & Kaushik, S.C., 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic feasibility of solar ponds for various thermal applications: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 123-139.
    17. Aygun, Hakan & Kirmizi, Mehmet & Turan, Onder, 2022. "Propeller effects on energy, exergy and sustainability parameters of a small turboprop engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    18. Etemoglu, A.B. & Can, M., 2007. "Classification of geothermal resources in Turkey by exergy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(7), pages 1596-1606, September.
    19. Redha, Adel Mohammed & Dincer, Ibrahim & Gadalla, Mohamed, 2011. "Thermodynamic performance assessment of wind energy systems: An application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4002-4010.
    20. Koroneos, C. & Dompros, A. & Roumbas, G. & Moussiopoulos, N., 2005. "Advantages of the use of hydrogen fuel as compared to kerosene," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 99-113.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:34:y:2009:i:12:p:2852-2859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.