IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v131y2019icp45-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing solution quality and computational performance in the long-term generation scheduling problem considering different hydro production function approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Fredo, Guilherme Luiz Minetto
  • Finardi, Erlon Cristian
  • de Matos, Vitor Luiz

Abstract

The long-term generation scheduling (LTGS) problem aims at finding a generation policy that minimizes an objective function over a multi-year planning horizon. A crucial aspect of this problem is the Hydropower Production Function (HPF), which relates power with head, turbined outflow, and efficiency of the generating units. Given that the LTGS is a large-scale stochastic optimization problem, the HPF is modeled in a simplified manner. However, considering the high-performance computers currently available and the recent advances in stochastic optimization algorithms, it is possible to enhance the HPF modeling to use the energy resources more efficiently. This paper proposes a piecewise linear model of HPF that considers the plant generation as a function of the volume and the total outflow. Unlike previous works, the HPF also considers the (nonlinear) efficiency function of each generating unit. The paper also presents a comparison between the proposed HPF and a one-dimensional HPF known as constant productivity. The generation policy and the computational burden are analyzed using an optimization-simulation process based on Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming algorithm. The computational tests use data of a large-scale electrical power system, which corresponds to about 90% of the Brazilian system.

Suggested Citation

  • Fredo, Guilherme Luiz Minetto & Finardi, Erlon Cristian & de Matos, Vitor Luiz, 2019. "Assessing solution quality and computational performance in the long-term generation scheduling problem considering different hydro production function approaches," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 45-54.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:131:y:2019:i:c:p:45-54
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148118308231
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cerisola, Santiago & Latorre, Jesus M. & Ramos, Andres, 2012. "Stochastic dual dynamic programming applied to nonconvex hydrothermal models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 687-697.
    2. Philpott, A.B. & de Matos, V.L., 2012. "Dynamic sampling algorithms for multi-stage stochastic programs with risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 470-483.
    3. Hyndman, Rob J. & Koehler, Anne B., 2006. "Another look at measures of forecast accuracy," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 679-688.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matheus Henrique Dal Molin Ribeiro & Stéfano Frizzo Stefenon & José Donizetti de Lima & Ademir Nied & Viviana Cocco Mariani & Leandro dos Santos Coelho, 2020. "Electricity Price Forecasting Based on Self-Adaptive Decomposition and Heterogeneous Ensemble Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, October.
    2. David Lucas dos Santos Abreu & Erlon Cristian Finardi, 2022. "Continuous Piecewise Linear Approximation of Plant-Based Hydro Production Function for Generation Scheduling Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Shuo Huang & Xinyu Wu & Yiyang Wu & Zheng Zhang, 2023. "Mid-Term Optimal Scheduling of Low-Head Cascaded Hydropower Stations Considering Inflow Unevenness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Pedro H. M. Nascimento & Vinícius A. Cabral & Ivo C. Silva Junior & Frederico F. Panoeiro & Leonardo M. Honório & André L. M. Marcato, 2021. "Spillage Forecast Models in Hydroelectric Power Plants Using Information from Telemetry Stations and Hydraulic Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Zheng, Hao & Feng, Suzhen & Chen, Cheng & Wang, Jinwen, 2022. "A new three-triangle based method to linearly concave hydropower output in long-term reservoir operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    6. Ramon Abritta & Frederico Panoeiro & Leonardo Honório & Ivo Silva Junior & André Marcato & Anapaula Guimarães, 2020. "Hydroelectric Operation Optimization and Unexpected Spillage Indications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Haugen, Mari & Blaisdell-Pijuan, Paris L. & Botterud, Audun & Levin, Todd & Zhou, Zhi & Belsnes, Michael & Korpås, Magnus & Somani, Abhishek, 2024. "Power market models for the clean energy transition: State of the art and future research needs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    8. Periçaro, Gislaine A. & Karas, Elizabeth W. & Gonzaga, Clóvis C. & Marcílio, Débora C. & Oening, Ana Paula & Matioli, Luiz Carlos & Detzel, Daniel H.M. & de Geus, Klaus & Bessa, Marcelo R., 2020. "Optimal non-anticipative scenarios for nonlinear hydro-thermal power systems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 387(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duenas, Pablo & Ramos, Andres & Tapia-Ahumada, Karen & Olmos, Luis & Rivier, Michel & Pérez-Arriaga, Jose-Ignacio, 2018. "Security of supply in a carbon-free electric power system: The case of Iceland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 443-454.
    2. Lohmann, Timo & Hering, Amanda S. & Rebennack, Steffen, 2016. "Spatio-temporal hydro forecasting of multireservoir inflows for hydro-thermal scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 243-258.
    3. repec:prg:jnlcfu:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:id:572 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Chang, Andrew C. & Hanson, Tyler J., 2016. "The accuracy of forecasts prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 23-43.
    5. Frank, Johannes, 2023. "Forecasting realized volatility in turbulent times using temporal fusion transformers," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 03/2023, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    6. Kourentzes, Nikolaos & Petropoulos, Fotios & Trapero, Juan R., 2014. "Improving forecasting by estimating time series structural components across multiple frequencies," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 291-302.
    7. Paulo Júlio & Pedro M. Esperança, 2012. "Evaluating the forecast quality of GDP components: An application to G7," GEE Papers 0047, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Apr 2012.
    8. Cameron Roach & Rob Hyndman & Souhaib Ben Taieb, 2021. "Non‐linear mixed‐effects models for time series forecasting of smart meter demand," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(6), pages 1118-1130, September.
    9. Alysha M De Livera, 2010. "Automatic forecasting with a modified exponential smoothing state space framework," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 10/10, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    10. Nikitopoulos, Christina Sklibosios & Thomas, Alice Carole & Wang, Jianxin, 2023. "The economic impact of daily volatility persistence on energy markets," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    11. I. Yu. Zolotova & V. V. Dvorkin, 2017. "Short-term forecasting of prices for the Russian wholesale electricity market based on neural networks," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 608-615, November.
    12. Döpke, Jörg & Fritsche, Ulrich & Müller, Karsten, 2019. "Has macroeconomic forecasting changed after the Great Recession? Panel-based evidence on forecast accuracy and forecaster behavior from Germany," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    13. Alois Pichler & Ruben Schlotter, 2020. "Quantification of Risk in Classical Models of Finance," Papers 2004.04397, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    14. Thiyanga S. Talagala & Feng Li & Yanfei Kang, 2019. "Feature-based Forecast-Model Performance Prediction," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 21/19, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    15. Martin Guth, 2022. "Predicting Default Probabilities for Stress Tests: A Comparison of Models," Papers 2202.03110, arXiv.org.
    16. Santamaría-Bonfil, G. & Reyes-Ballesteros, A. & Gershenson, C., 2016. "Wind speed forecasting for wind farms: A method based on support vector regression," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 790-809.
    17. Meira, Erick & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando Luiz & de Menezes, Lilian M., 2022. "Forecasting natural gas consumption using Bagging and modified regularization techniques," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    18. Wasilewski, J. & Baczynski, D., 2017. "Short-term electric energy production forecasting at wind power plants in pareto-optimality context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 177-187.
    19. Huber, Jakob & Stuckenschmidt, Heiner, 2020. "Daily retail demand forecasting using machine learning with emphasis on calendric special days," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1420-1438.
    20. Goldsworthy, M. & Moore, T. & Peristy, M. & Grimeland, M., 2022. "Cloud-based model-predictive-control of a battery storage system at a commercial site," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    21. Bialowolski, Piotr & Kuszewski, Tomasz & Witkowski, Bartosz, 2015. "Bayesian averaging vs. dynamic factor models for forecasting economic aggregates with tendency survey data," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 9, pages 1-37.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:131:y:2019:i:c:p:45-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.