IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v99y2012icp114-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time

Author

Listed:
  • Henry, Devanandham
  • Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez, Jose

Abstract

Resilience is generally understood as the ability of an entity to recover from an external disruptive event. In the system domain, a formal definition and quantification of the concept of resilience has been elusive. This paper proposes generic metrics and formulae for quantifying system resilience. The discussions and graphical examples illustrate that the quantitative model is aligned with the fundamental concept of resilience. Based on the approach presented it is possible to analyze resilience as a time dependent function in the context of systems. The paper describes the metrics of network and system resilience, time for resilience and total cost of resilience. Also the paper describes the key parameters necessary to analyze system resilience such as the following: disruptive events, component restoration and overall resilience strategy. A road network example is used to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed resilience metrics and how these analyses form the basis for developing effective resilience design strategies. The metrics described are generic enough to be implemented in a variety of applications as long as appropriate figures-of-merit and the necessary system parameters, system decomposition and component parameters are defined.

Suggested Citation

  • Henry, Devanandham & Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez, Jose, 2012. "Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 114-122.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:99:y:2012:i:c:p:114-122
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832011001748
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rocco S., Claudio M. & Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez, José & Salazar A., Daniel E., 2010. "Bi and tri-objective optimization in the deterministic network interdiction problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 887-896.
    2. Whitson, John C. & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2009. "Resiliency as a component importance measure in network reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1685-1693.
    3. Hausken, Kjell & Levitin, Gregory, 2009. "Minmax defense strategy for complex multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 577-587.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chi Zhang & Jose Ramirez-Marquez, 2013. "Protecting critical infrastructures against intentional attacks: a two-stage game with incomplete information," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 244-258.
    2. Zhang, Chi & Ramirez-Marquez, José Emmanuel & Wang, Jianhui, 2015. "Critical infrastructure protection using secrecy – A discrete simultaneous game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 212-221.
    3. Levitin, Gregory & Hausken, Kjell, 2009. "Intelligence and impact contests in systems with redundancy, false targets, and partial protection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(12), pages 1927-1941.
    4. Baroud, Hiba & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2014. "Importance measures for inland waterway network resilience," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 55-67.
    5. Bricha, Naji & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2014. "Extra-capacity versus protection for supply networks under attack," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 185-196.
    6. Peiqiu Guan & Meilin He & Jun Zhuang & Stephen C. Hora, 2017. "Modeling a Multitarget Attacker–Defender Game with Budget Constraints," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 87-107, June.
    7. Iaiani, Matteo & Tugnoli, Alessandro & Macini, Paolo & Cozzani, Valerio, 2021. "Outage and asset damage triggered by malicious manipulation of the control system in process plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    8. Xiang He & Yongbo Yuan, 2019. "A Framework of Identifying Critical Water Distribution Pipelines from Recovery Resilience," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(11), pages 3691-3706, September.
    9. Li, Y.F. & Sansavini, G. & Zio, E., 2013. "Non-dominated sorting binary differential evolution for the multi-objective optimization of cascading failures protection in complex networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 195-205.
    10. Hossain, Eklas & Roy, Shidhartho & Mohammad, Naeem & Nawar, Nafiu & Dipta, Debopriya Roy, 2021. "Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliability during natural disasters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    11. Qingqing Zhai & Rui Peng & Jun Zhuang, 2020. "Defender–Attacker Games with Asymmetric Player Utilities," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(2), pages 408-420, February.
    12. Castet, Jean-Francois & Saleh, Joseph H., 2012. "On the concept of survivability, with application to spacecraft and space-based networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 123-138.
    13. Gedik, Ridvan & Medal, Hugh & Rainwater, Chase & Pohl, Ed A. & Mason, Scott J., 2014. "Vulnerability assessment and re-routing of freight trains under disruptions: A coal supply chain network application," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 45-57.
    14. Han Zhang & Hanjie Yuan & Gengfeng Li & Yanling Lin, 2018. "Quantitative Resilience Assessment under a Tri-Stage Framework for Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Zhang, Jing & Zhuang, Jun & Jose, Victor Richmond R., 2018. "The role of risk preferences in a multi-target defender-attacker resource allocation game," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 95-104.
    16. Rocco S., Claudio M. & Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez, José, 2013. "Identification of top contributors to system vulnerability via an ordinal optimization based method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 92-98.
    17. Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco S, Claudio M. & Levitin, Gregory, 2009. "Optimal protection of general source–sink networks via evolutionary techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1676-1684.
    18. Li, Jian & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo & Chen, Changkun & Shi, Congling, 2017. "AC power flow importance measures considering multi-element failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 89-97.
    19. Tran, Huy T. & Balchanos, Michael & Domerçant, Jean Charles & Mavris, Dimitri N., 2017. "A framework for the quantitative assessment of performance-based system resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 73-84.
    20. Dan Kovenock & Brian Roberson, 2012. "Strategic Defense And Attack For Series And Parallel Reliability Systems: Comment," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 507-515, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:99:y:2012:i:c:p:114-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.