IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v96y2011i7p793-813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic reliability of digital-based transmitters

Author

Listed:
  • Brissaud, Florent
  • Smidts, Carol
  • Barros, Anne
  • Bérenguer, Christophe

Abstract

Dynamic reliability explicitly handles the interactions between the stochastic behaviour of system components and the deterministic behaviour of process variables. While dynamic reliability provides a more efficient and realistic way to perform probabilistic risk assessment than “static†approaches, its industrial level applications are still limited. Factors contributing to this situation are the inherent complexity of the theory and the lack of a generic platform. More recently the increased use of digital-based systems has also introduced additional modelling challenges related to specific interactions between system components. Typical examples are the “intelligent transmitters†which are able to exchange information, and to perform internal data processing and advanced functionalities. To make a contribution to solving these challenges, the mathematical framework of dynamic reliability is extended to handle the data and information which are processed and exchanged between systems components. Stochastic deviations that may affect system properties are also introduced to enhance the modelling of failures. A formalized Petri net approach is then presented to perform the corresponding reliability analyses using numerical methods. Following this formalism, a versatile model for the dynamic reliability modelling of digital-based transmitters is proposed. Finally the framework's flexibility and effectiveness is demonstrated on a substantial case study involving a simplified model of a nuclear fast reactor.

Suggested Citation

  • Brissaud, Florent & Smidts, Carol & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2011. "Dynamic reliability of digital-based transmitters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 793-813.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:96:y:2011:i:7:p:793-813
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183201000270X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aldemir, T. & Guarro, S. & Mandelli, D. & Kirschenbaum, J. & Mangan, L.A. & Bucci, P. & Yau, M. & Ekici, E. & Miller, D.W. & Sun, X. & Arndt, S.A., 2010. "Probabilistic risk assessment modeling of digital instrumentation and control systems using two dynamic methodologies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(10), pages 1011-1039.
    2. Eymard, Robert & Mercier, Sophie, 2008. "Comparison of numerical methods for the assessment of production availability of a hybrid system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 168-177.
    3. Brissaud, Florent & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe & Charpentier, Dominique, 2011. "Reliability analysis for new technology-based transmitters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 299-313.
    4. Nelson, Paul & Wang, Shuwen, 2007. "Dynamic reliability via computational solution of generalized state-transition equations for entry-time processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(9), pages 1281-1293.
    5. P Škňouřilová & R Briš, 2008. "Coloured Petri nets and a dynamic reliability problem," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(4), pages 635-642, December.
    6. Zhu, Dongfeng & Mosleh, Ali & Smidts, Carol, 2007. "A framework to integrate software behavior into dynamic probabilistic risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(12), pages 1733-1755.
    7. Al-Dabbagh, Ahmad W. & Lu, Lixuan, 2010. "Reliability modeling of networked control systems using dynamic flowgraph methodology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1202-1209.
    8. Ghostine, Rony & Thiriet, Jean-Marc & Aubry, Jean-François, 2011. "Variable delays and message losses: Influence on the reliability of a control loop," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 160-171.
    9. H Zhang & F Dufour & Y Dutuit & K Gonzalez, 2008. "Piecewise deterministic Markov processes and dynamic reliability," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(4), pages 545-551, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hadri, Omar & Prescott, Darren, 2024. "Modular asset management framework based on Petri-net formalisations and risk-aware maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Maidana, Renan G. & Parhizkar, Tarannom & Gomola, Alojz & Utne, Ingrid B. & Mosleh, Ali, 2023. "Supervised dynamic probabilistic risk assessment: Review and comparison of methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Babykina, Génia & Brînzei, Nicolae & Aubry, Jean-François & Deleuze, Gilles, 2016. "Modeling and simulation of a controlled steam generator in the context of dynamic reliability using a Stochastic Hybrid Automaton," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 115-136.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Babykina, Génia & Brînzei, Nicolae & Aubry, Jean-François & Deleuze, Gilles, 2016. "Modeling and simulation of a controlled steam generator in the context of dynamic reliability using a Stochastic Hybrid Automaton," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 115-136.
    2. Thieme, Christoph A. & Mosleh, Ali & Utne, Ingrid B. & Hegde, Jeevith, 2020. "Incorporating software failure in risk analysis – Part 1: Software functional failure mode classification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. McNelles, Phillip & Zeng, Zhao Chang & Renganathan, Guna & Lamarre, Greg & Akl, Yolande & Lu, Lixuan, 2016. "A comparison of Fault Trees and the Dynamic Flowgraph Methodology for the analysis of FPGA-based safety systems Part 1: Reactor trip logic loop reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 135-150.
    4. Tyrväinen, T., 2013. "Risk importance measures in the dynamic flowgraph methodology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 35-50.
    5. Signoret, Jean-Pierre & Dutuit, Yves & Cacheux, Pierre-Joseph & Folleau, Cyrille & Collas, Stéphane & Thomas, Philippe, 2013. "Make your Petri nets understandable: Reliability block diagrams driven Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 61-75.
    6. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    7. Mercier, Sophie & Pham, Hai Ha, 2012. "A preventive maintenance policy for a continuously monitored system with correlated wear indicators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 263-272.
    8. Alizadeh, Siamak & Sriramula, Srinivas, 2018. "Impact of common cause failure on reliability performance of redundant safety related systems subject to process demand," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 129-150.
    9. Samia Maza, 2014. "Stochastic activity networks for performance evaluation of fault-tolerant systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(3), pages 243-253, June.
    10. Ghostine, Rony & Thiriet, Jean-Marc & Aubry, Jean-François, 2011. "Variable delays and message losses: Influence on the reliability of a control loop," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 160-171.
    11. de Saporta, Benoîte & Zhang, Huilong, 2013. "Predictive maintenance for the heated hold-up tank," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 82-90.
    12. Yang, Jun & Zou, Bowen & Yang, Ming, 2019. "Bidirectional implementation of Markov/CCMT for dynamic reliability analysis with application to digital I&C systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 278-290.
    13. Favarò, Francesca M. & Saleh, Joseph H., 2016. "Toward risk assessment 2.0: Safety supervisory control and model-based hazard monitoring for risk-informed safety interventions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 316-330.
    14. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Advanced RESTART method for the estimation of the probability of failure of highly reliable hybrid dynamic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 117-126.
    15. Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Droguett, Enrique López, 2009. "Mathematical formulation and numerical treatment based on transition frequency densities and quadrature methods for non-homogeneous semi-Markov processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 342-349.
    16. Yang, Jun & Aldemir, Tunc, 2016. "An algorithm for the computationally efficient deductive implementation of the Markov/Cell-to-Cell-Mapping Technique for risk significant scenario identification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1-8.
    17. Maidana, Renan G. & Parhizkar, Tarannom & Gomola, Alojz & Utne, Ingrid B. & Mosleh, Ali, 2023. "Supervised dynamic probabilistic risk assessment: Review and comparison of methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    18. Li, Jinghui & Mosleh, Ali & Kang, Rui, 2011. "Likelihood ratio gradient estimation for dynamic reliability applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1667-1679.
    19. Li, Y.F. & Valla, S. & Zio, E., 2015. "Reliability assessment of generic geared wind turbines by GTST-MLD model and Monte Carlo simulation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 222-233.
    20. Park, Jong Woo & Lee, Seung Jun, 2022. "Simulation optimization framework for dynamic probabilistic safety assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:96:y:2011:i:7:p:793-813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.