IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v93y2008i6p806-814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for intelligent reliability centered maintenance analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Zhonghua
  • Jia, Xisheng
  • Gao, Ping
  • Wu, Su
  • Wang, Jianzhao

Abstract

To improve the efficiency of reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) analysis, case-based reasoning (CBR), as a kind of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, was successfully introduced into RCM analysis process, and a framework for intelligent RCM analysis (IRCMA) was studied. The idea for IRCMA is based on the fact that the historical records of RCM analysis on similar items can be referenced and used for the current RCM analysis of a new item. Because many common or similar items may exist in the analyzed equipment, the repeated tasks of RCM analysis can be considerably simplified or avoided by revising the similar cases in conducting RCM analysis. Based on the previous theory studies, an intelligent RCM analysis system (IRCMAS) prototype was developed. This research has focused on the description of the definition, basic principles as well as a framework of IRCMA, and discussion of critical techniques in the IRCMA. Finally, IRCMAS prototype is presented based on a case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Zhonghua & Jia, Xisheng & Gao, Ping & Wu, Su & Wang, Jianzhao, 2008. "A framework for intelligent reliability centered maintenance analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(6), pages 806-814.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:6:p:806-814
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832007001287
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Selvik, J.T. & Aven, T., 2011. "A framework for reliability and risk centered maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 324-331.
    2. Chemweno, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Van Horenbeek, Adriaan & Muchiri, Peter, 2015. "Development of a risk assessment selection methodology for asset maintenance decision making: An analytic network process (ANP) approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 663-676.
    3. Adherbal Caminada Netto & Arthur Henrique de Andrade Melani & Carlos Alberto Murad & Miguel Angelo de Carvalho Michalski & Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza & Silvio Ikuyo Nabeta, 2020. "A Novel Approach to Defining Maintenance Significant Items: A Hydro Generator Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Melani, Arthur Henrique Andrade & Murad, Carlos Alberto & Caminada Netto, Adherbal & Souza, Gilberto Francisco Martha de & Nabeta, Silvio Ikuyo, 2018. "Criticality-based maintenance of a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 767-781.
    5. Bas, Esra, 2011. "An investment plan for preventing child injuries using risk priority number of failure mode and effects analysis methodology and a multi-objective, multi-dimensional mixed 0-1 knapsack model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 748-756.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:6:p:806-814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.