IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v251y2024ics0951832024004691.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A general inspection and replacement policy for protection systems subject to shocks with state dependent effect

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigues, Augusto J.S.
  • Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V.
  • Lee, Chi-Guhn

Abstract

This paper proposes a new maintenance policy for protection systems which fail due to competing causes: internal deterioration and fatal external shocks. The study is motivated by a real problem in a power distribution company, in which a circuit breaker is designed to protect an electrical network from critical events such as overloads and short circuits. The failure of the system is hidden and can lead to a disaster if it is not replaced before a demand is received. So, to improve its readiness, we have developed a new two-phase (inspection & replacement) policy for a protection system with a heterogeneous population. Heterogeneity reflects factors such as variability in the quality of spare parts or in the installation of the components, which can be poorly or properly executed, resulting in some having a short life, while others may achieve a long life. Inspections are imperfect, which induces misclassification. The deterioration process is modeled via the delay-time concept. Furthermore, the shock rate depends upon the state of the system and follows a non-homogeneous Poisson process. Thus, using a numerical approach, the objective of this study is to determine the number of inspections during the first phase, the interval between consecutive inspections, and the age for scheduled preventive replacement. We compared this policy to two other classical policies via a case study and found that it has significant cost-saving potential. Generally, our results indicate when inspections should be prioritized over age-preventive replacement, and vice versa. Multi-phase policies are particularly effective for components with different characteristic lives, with inspections being crucial for maintaining readiness, often requiring investment in quality assurance to prevent misclassification. Conversely, age-based policies are more advantageous for strong (long-lived) components or when the probability of misclassification is high.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigues, Augusto J.S. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2024. "A general inspection and replacement policy for protection systems subject to shocks with state dependent effect," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:251:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024004691
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024004691
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110397?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:251:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024004691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.