IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v250y2024ics095183202400382x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A robust multi-risk model and its reliability relevance: A Bayes study with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Abba, Badamasi
  • Wu, Jinbiao
  • Muhammad, Mustapha

Abstract

This paper proposes a robust model that describes complex time-to-failure and competing risk datasets found with bathtub curve hazard rate (BCHR). The resulting model, named the flexible Dhillon–Weibull competing risk (FDWCR) model, hybridized the Weibull and flexible Dhillon distributions. It is built with the assumptions of competing risk data characterized by monotone and non-monotone hazard rates. In contrast to most recent additive or competing risk models, the FDWCR model can analyze not only time-to-failure datasets identified with increasing hazard rates and BCHR but also effectively describe time-to-failure data associated with decreasing, upside-down bathtub and modified bathtub hazard rates. Several reliability and structural properties of the model are discussed. We present a complete Bayesian paradigm for FDWCR and suggest employing the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) algorithm to enhance precision and expedite inference. The maximum likelihood estimators are also presented. We evaluate the appropriateness of the proposed estimators via simulation experiments, considering both techniques. We offer three case studies to demonstrate the practical utility of the proposed model. The results outperform those produced by other alternative models, indicating a reliable approach for modeling diverse competing risk problems, particularly in the context of engineering reliability studies or other domains of quantitative research.

Suggested Citation

  • Abba, Badamasi & Wu, Jinbiao & Muhammad, Mustapha, 2024. "A robust multi-risk model and its reliability relevance: A Bayes study with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methodology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s095183202400382x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202400382X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shakhatreh, Mohammed K. & Lemonte, Artur J. & Moreno–Arenas, Germán, 2019. "The log-normal modified Weibull distribution and its reliability implications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 6-22.
    2. Jia, Junmei & Yan, Zaizai & Peng, Xiuyun & An, Xiaoyan, 2020. "A new distribution for modeling the wind speed data in Inner Mongolia of China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1979-1991.
    3. Sabri-Laghaie, Kamyar & Fathi, Mahdi & Zio, Enrico & Mazhar, Maryam, 2022. "A novel reliability monitoring scheme based on the monitoring of manufacturing quality error rates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Abba, Badamasi & Wang, Hong & Bakouch, Hassan S., 2022. "A reliability and survival model for one and two failure modes system with applications to complete and censored datasets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    5. Zhang, Chunfang & Wang, Liang & Bai, Xuchao & Huang, Jianan, 2022. "Bayesian reliability analysis for copula based step-stress partially accelerated dependent competing risks model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Negreiros, Ana Cláudia Souza Vidal de & Lins, Isis Didier & Moura, Márcio José das Chagas & Droguett, Enrique López, 2020. "Reliability data analysis of systems in the wear-out phase using a (corrected) q-Exponential likelihood," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Xiao, Rui & Zayed, Tarek & Meguid, Mohamed A. & Sushama, Laxmi, 2024. "Improving failure modeling for gas transmission pipelines: A survival analysis and machine learning integrated approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Martón, I. & Sánchez, A.I. & Carlos, S. & Mullor, R. & Martorell, S., 2023. "Prognosis of wear-out effect on of safety equipment reliability for nuclear power plants long-term safe operation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    9. Sarhan, Ammar M. & Hamilton, David C. & Smith, B., 2010. "Statistical analysis of competing risks models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 953-962.
    10. Rifaai, Talha M. & Abokifa, Ahmed A. & Sela, Lina, 2022. "Integrated approach for pipe failure prediction and condition scoring in water infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Samuel Thomas & Wanzhu Tu, 2021. "Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo in R," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(4), pages 403-413, October.
    12. Almalki, Saad J. & Yuan, Jingsong, 2013. "A new modified Weibull distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 164-170.
    13. Ranjan, Rakesh & Sen, Rijji & Upadhyay, Satyanshu K., 2021. "Bayes analysis of some important lifetime models using MCMC based approaches when the observations are left truncated and right censored," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    14. Jiang, R., 2013. "A new bathtub curve model with a finite support," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 44-51.
    15. Zhang, Lin & Chen, Xiaohui & Khatab, Abdelhakim & An, Youjun & Feng, XiaoNing, 2024. "Joint optimization of selective maintenance and repairpersons assignment problem for mission-oriented systems operating under s-dependent competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    16. Sarhan, Ammar M. & Apaloo, Joseph, 2013. "Exponentiated modified Weibull extension distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 137-144.
    17. Prataviera, Fábio & Ortega, Edwin M.M. & Cordeiro, Gauss M. & Pescim, Rodrigo R. & Verssani, Bruna A.W., 2018. "A new generalized odd log-logistic flexible Weibull regression model with applications in repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 13-26.
    18. Ranjan, Rakesh & Singh, Sonam & Upadhyay, Satyanshu K., 2015. "A Bayes analysis of a competing risk model based on gamma and exponential failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 35-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad, Abd EL-Baset A. & Ghazal, M.G.M., 2020. "Exponentiated additive Weibull distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Abba, Badamasi & Wang, Hong & Bakouch, Hassan S., 2022. "A reliability and survival model for one and two failure modes system with applications to complete and censored datasets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Tien Thanh Thach & Radim Bris, 2020. "Improved new modified Weibull distribution: A Bayes study using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo simulation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 496-511, June.
    4. Du, Yi-Mu & Sun, C.P., 2022. "A novel interpretable model of bathtub hazard rate based on system hierarchy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Shakhatreh, Mohammed K. & Lemonte, Artur J. & Moreno–Arenas, Germán, 2019. "The log-normal modified Weibull distribution and its reliability implications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 6-22.
    6. Badamasi Abba & Hong Wang, 2024. "A new failure times model for one and two failure modes system: A Bayesian study with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo simulation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(2), pages 304-323, April.
    7. Rasool Roozegar & Saralees Nadarajah & Eisa Mahmoudi, 2022. "The Power Series Exponential Power Series Distributions with Applications to Failure Data Sets," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 44-78, May.
    8. Zhiyuan Zuo & Liang Wang & Yuhlong Lio, 2022. "Reliability Estimation for Dependent Left-Truncated and Right-Censored Competing Risks Data with Illustrations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Jiang, Renyan & Qi, Faqun & Cao, Yu, 2023. "Relation between aging intensity function and WPP plot and its application in reliability modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. Almalki, Saad J. & Nadarajah, Saralees, 2014. "Modifications of the Weibull distribution: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 32-55.
    11. Gupta, Sanjib Kumar & Chattopadhyay, Gaurangadeb, 2022. "Early detection of reliability related problems from two-dimensional warranty data considering labour code priority index," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    12. Peña-Ramírez, Fernando A. & Guerra, Renata Rojas & Canterle, Diego Ramos & Cordeiro, Gauss M., 2020. "The logistic Nadarajah–Haghighi distribution and its associated regression model for reliability applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    13. He, Bo & Cui, Weimin & Du, Xiaofeng, 2016. "An additive modified Weibull distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 28-37.
    14. Gurami Tsitsiashvili & Alexandr Losev, 2022. "Safety Margin Prediction Algorithms Based on Linear Regression Analysis Estimates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-10, June.
    15. Salazar García, Juan Fernando & Guzmán Aguilar, Diana Sirley & Hoyos Nieto, Daniel Arturo, 2023. "Modelación de una prima de seguros mediante la aplicación de métodos actuariales, teoría de fallas y Black-Scholes en la salud en Colombia [Modelling of an insurance premium through the application," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 35(1), pages 330-359, June.
    16. Coolen-Maturi, Tahani & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2014. "Nonparametric predictive inference for combined competing risks data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 87-97.
    17. Christian Acal & Juan E. Ruiz-Castro & David Maldonado & Juan B. Roldán, 2021. "One Cut-Point Phase-Type Distributions in Reliability. An Application to Resistive Random Access Memories," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-13, October.
    18. Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2014. "Nonparametric predictive pairwise comparison with competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 146-153.
    19. Hirofumi Michimae & Takeshi Emura, 2022. "Likelihood Inference for Copula Models Based on Left-Truncated and Competing Risks Data from Field Studies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-15, June.
    20. José H. Dias Gonçalves & João J. Ferreira Gomes & Lihki Rubio & Filipe R. Ramos, 2023. "A Generalized Log Gamma Approach: Theoretical Contributions and an Application to Companies’ Life Expectancy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-23, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s095183202400382x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.