IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v250y2024ics095183202400382x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A robust multi-risk model and its reliability relevance: A Bayes study with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Abba, Badamasi
  • Wu, Jinbiao
  • Muhammad, Mustapha

Abstract

This paper proposes a robust model that describes complex time-to-failure and competing risk datasets found with bathtub curve hazard rate (BCHR). The resulting model, named the flexible Dhillon–Weibull competing risk (FDWCR) model, hybridized the Weibull and flexible Dhillon distributions. It is built with the assumptions of competing risk data characterized by monotone and non-monotone hazard rates. In contrast to most recent additive or competing risk models, the FDWCR model can analyze not only time-to-failure datasets identified with increasing hazard rates and BCHR but also effectively describe time-to-failure data associated with decreasing, upside-down bathtub and modified bathtub hazard rates. Several reliability and structural properties of the model are discussed. We present a complete Bayesian paradigm for FDWCR and suggest employing the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) algorithm to enhance precision and expedite inference. The maximum likelihood estimators are also presented. We evaluate the appropriateness of the proposed estimators via simulation experiments, considering both techniques. We offer three case studies to demonstrate the practical utility of the proposed model. The results outperform those produced by other alternative models, indicating a reliable approach for modeling diverse competing risk problems, particularly in the context of engineering reliability studies or other domains of quantitative research.

Suggested Citation

  • Abba, Badamasi & Wu, Jinbiao & Muhammad, Mustapha, 2024. "A robust multi-risk model and its reliability relevance: A Bayes study with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methodology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s095183202400382x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202400382X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s095183202400382x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.