IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v220y2022ics0951832021007584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving CubeSat reliability: Subsystem redundancy or improved testing?

Author

Listed:
  • Bouwmeester, J.
  • Menicucci, A.
  • Gill, E.K.A.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to investigate which approach would lead to more reliable CubeSats: full subsystem redundancy or improved testing. Based on data from surveys, the reliability of satellites and subsystems is estimated using a Kaplan–Meier estimator. Subsequently, a variety of reliability models is defined and their maximum likelihood estimates are compared. A product of a Lognormal distribution addressing immaturity failure and a Gompertz distribution addressing wear-out is found to best represent CubeSat reliability. Bayesian inference is used to find realistic wear-out parameters by using failure data of small satellites. Subsystem reliability estimates are subsequently found using a similar approach. A reliability model for CubeSats with redundant subsystems is established, verified and applied in a Monte Carlo simulation. The results are compared with a model for reduced immaturity failure. Allocating resources to reduction of immaturity failures through improved testing is considered to be superior to allocating these resources to the implementation of subsystem redundancy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bouwmeester, J. & Menicucci, A. & Gill, E.K.A., 2022. "Improving CubeSat reliability: Subsystem redundancy or improved testing?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:220:y:2022:i:c:s0951832021007584
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021007584
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Castet, Jean-Francois & Saleh, Joseph H., 2009. "Satellite and satellite subsystems reliability: Statistical data analysis and modeling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1718-1728.
    2. Castet, Jean-Francois & Saleh, Joseph H., 2010. "Single versus mixture Weibull distributions for nonparametric satellite reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 295-300.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hirofumi Michimae & Takeshi Emura, 2022. "Likelihood Inference for Copula Models Based on Left-Truncated and Competing Risks Data from Field Studies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Yang, Xiaohui & Liu, Kang & Leng, Zhengyang & Liu, Tao & Zhang, Liufang & Mei, Linghao, 2022. "Multi-dimensions analysis of solar hybrid CCHP systems with redundant design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lowe, Christopher J. & Macdonald, Malcolm, 2020. "Space mission resilience with inter-satellite networking," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Damircheli, Mahrad & Fakoor, Mahdi & Yadegari, Hamed, 2020. "Failure assessment logic model (FALM): A new approach for reliability analysis of satellite attitude control subsystem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Jung, Seunghwa & Choi, Jihwan P., 2019. "Predicting system failure rates of SRAM-based FPGA on-board processors in space radiation environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 374-386.
    4. Acitas, Sukru & Aladag, Cagdas Hakan & Senoglu, Birdal, 2019. "A new approach for estimating the parameters of Weibull distribution via particle swarm optimization: An application to the strengths of glass fibre data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 116-127.
    5. Castet, Jean-Francois & Saleh, Joseph H., 2012. "On the concept of survivability, with application to spacecraft and space-based networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 123-138.
    6. Zehao Pan & Jianing Wu & Shaoze Yan & Yongxia Gu, 2014. "Feature generation method for fault diagnosis of closed cable loop used in deployable space structures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(6), pages 631-640, December.
    7. Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Lopes, R.S., 2019. "Delay-time modelling of a critical system subject to random inspections," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 772-782.
    8. Zeng, Ying & Huang, Tudi & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2023. "Reliability modeling for power converter in satellite considering periodic phased mission," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    9. Yang, Chen & Lu, Wanze & Xia, Yuanqing, 2023. "Reliability-constrained optimal attitude-vibration control for rigid-flexible coupling satellite using interval dimension-wise analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    10. Li, Mingyang & Meng, Hongdao & Zhang, Qingpeng, 2017. "A nonparametric Bayesian modeling approach for heterogeneous lifetime data with covariates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 95-104.
    11. Jia, Xiang & Wang, Dong & Jiang, Ping & Guo, Bo, 2016. "Inference on the reliability of Weibull distribution with multiply Type-I censored data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 171-181.
    12. Chen, Zhiwei & Zhang, Hao & Wang, Xinyue & Yang, Jinling & Dui, Hongyan, 2024. "Reliability analysis and redundancy design of satellite communication system based on a novel Bayesian environmental importance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    13. Kim, So Young & Castet, Jean-Francois & Saleh, Joseph H., 2012. "Spacecraft electrical power subsystem: Failure behavior, reliability, and multi-state failure analyses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 55-65.
    14. Róbert Csalódi & Zoltán Birkner & János Abonyi, 2021. "Learning Interpretable Mixture of Weibull Distributions—Exploratory Analysis of How Economic Development Influences the Incidence of COVID-19 Deaths," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-11, November.
    15. Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Lopes, R.S. & Scarf, P.A., 2018. "A general inspection and opportunistic replacement policy for one-component systems of variable quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 911-919.
    16. Geng, Sunyue & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng & Gao, Su, 2021. "A reliable framework for satellite networks achieving energy requirements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Kowal, Karol, 2022. "Lifetime reliability and availability simulation for the electrical system of HTTR coupled to the electricity-hydrogen cogeneration plant," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    18. Franko, Mitja & Nagode, Marko, 2015. "Probability density function of the equivalent stress amplitude using statistical transformation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 118-125.
    19. Jianing Wu & Shaoze Yan, 2014. "An approach to system reliability prediction for mechanical equipment using fuzzy reasoning Petri net," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(1), pages 39-51, February.
    20. Li, Mingxin & Jiang, Xiaoli & Carroll, James & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2023. "A closed-loop maintenance strategy for offshore wind farms: Incorporating dynamic wind farm states and uncertainty-awareness in decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:220:y:2022:i:c:s0951832021007584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.