IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v195y2020ics0951832019304946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remaining useful lifetime prediction via deep domain adaptation

Author

Listed:
  • da Costa, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira
  • Akçay, Alp
  • Zhang, Yingqian
  • Kaymak, Uzay

Abstract

In Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) sufficient prior observed degradation data is usually critical for Remaining Useful Lifetime (RUL) prediction. Most previous data-driven methods assume that training (source) and testing (target) condition monitoring data have similar distributions. However, due to different operating conditions, fault modes and noise, distribution and feature shift exist across different domains. This shift reduces the performance of predictive models when no target observed run-to-failure data is available. To address this issue, this paper proposes a new data-driven approach for domain adaptation in prognostics using Long Short-Term Neural Networks (LSTM). We use a Domain Adversarial Neural Network (DANN) approach to adapt remaining useful life estimates to a target domain containing only sensor information. We analyse our approach using the NASA Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation (C-MAPPS). The results show that the proposed method can provide more reliable RUL predictions than models trained only on source data for varying operating conditions and fault modes.

Suggested Citation

  • da Costa, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira & Akçay, Alp & Zhang, Yingqian & Kaymak, Uzay, 2020. "Remaining useful lifetime prediction via deep domain adaptation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:195:y:2020:i:c:s0951832019304946
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832019304946
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Li, Xiang & Ding, Qian & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2018. "Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Listou Ellefsen, André & Bjørlykhaug, Emil & Æsøy, Vilmar & Ushakov, Sergey & Zhang, Houxiang, 2019. "Remaining useful life predictions for turbofan engine degradation using semi-supervised deep architecture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 240-251.
    4. Zio, Enrico & Di Maio, Francesco, 2010. "A data-driven fuzzy approach for predicting the remaining useful life in dynamic failure scenarios of a nuclear system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 49-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costa, Nahuel & Sánchez, Luciano, 2022. "Variational encoding approach for interpretable assessment of remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    3. Bae, Jinwoo & Xi, Zhimin, 2022. "Learning of physical health timestep using the LSTM network for remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    4. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yao & Hu, Zhenchao & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine enabled by fusing knowledge and deep learning models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Le Son, Khanh & Fouladirad, Mitra & Barros, Anne & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoît, 2013. "Remaining useful life estimation based on stochastic deterioration models: A comparative study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 165-175.
    6. Xiaojia Wang & Ting Huang & Keyu Zhu & Xibin Zhao, 2022. "LSTM-Based Broad Learning System for Remaining Useful Life Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Zhang, Wei & Li, Xiang & Ma, Hui & Luo, Zhong & Li, Xu, 2021. "Transfer learning using deep representation regularization in remaining useful life prediction across operating conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    8. Nguyen, Khanh T.P. & Medjaher, Kamal, 2019. "A new dynamic predictive maintenance framework using deep learning for failure prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 251-262.
    9. Vrignat, Pascal & Kratz, Frédéric & Avila, Manuel, 2022. "Sustainable manufacturing, maintenance policies, prognostics and health management: A literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    10. Yuanju Qu & Zengtao Hou, 2022. "Degradation principle of machines influenced by maintenance," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1521-1530, June.
    11. Dehghan Shoorkand, Hassan & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Hajji, Adnène, 2024. "A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for joint optimization of production and imperfect predictive maintenance planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    12. He, Yuxuan & Su, Huai & Zio, Enrico & Peng, Shiliang & Fan, Lin & Yang, Zhaoming & Yang, Zhe & Zhang, Jinjun, 2023. "A systematic method of remaining useful life estimation based on physics-informed graph neural networks with multisensor data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    13. Li, Xingyu & Krivtsov, Vasiliy & Arora, Karunesh, 2022. "Attention-based deep survival model for time series data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    14. Jiao, Ruihua & Peng, Kaixiang & Dong, Jie & Zhang, Chuanfang, 2020. "Fault monitoring and remaining useful life prediction framework for multiple fault modes in prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    15. Hu, Tao & Guo, Yiming & Gu, Liudong & Zhou, Yifan & Zhang, Zhisheng & Zhou, Zhiting, 2022. "Remaining useful life prediction of bearings under different working conditions using a deep feature disentanglement based transfer learning method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    16. Abdenour Soualhi & Mourad Lamraoui & Bilal Elyousfi & Hubert Razik, 2022. "PHM SURVEY: Implementation of Prognostic Methods for Monitoring Industrial Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Yu, Wennian & Kim, II Yong & Mechefske, Chris, 2020. "An improved similarity-based prognostic algorithm for RUL estimation using an RNN autoencoder scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    18. Al-Dahidi, Sameer & Di Maio, Francesco & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Remaining useful life estimation in heterogeneous fleets working under variable operating conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 109-124.
    19. Yu Mo & Liang Li & Biqing Huang & Xiu Li, 2023. "Few-shot RUL estimation based on model-agnostic meta-learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2359-2372, June.
    20. de Pater, Ingeborg & Reijns, Arthur & Mitici, Mihaela, 2022. "Alarm-based predictive maintenance scheduling for aircraft engines with imperfect Remaining Useful Life prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:195:y:2020:i:c:s0951832019304946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.