IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v194y2020ics0951832018311062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing human error when collecting failure cause information in the oil and gas industry: A review of ISO 14224:2016

Author

Listed:
  • Selvik, Jon T.
  • Bellamy, Linda J.

Abstract

The international standard ISO 14224 provides key guidance on how to achieve quality information about equipment failures for decision-making in the oil and gas industry, including specific guidance on data collection concepts and how to record and categorize failure causes. The third edition, issued in September 2016, is still focusing mainly on equipment failures, but has a higher focus on human errors than previously. It provides a ‘human error’ definition, currently the only one in an ISO standard, and a link to several types of error used in failure cause classification. In this article, the authors study the value of this added focus on human errors by assessing the definition and effect on failure cause classification, discussing the benefits and challenges. It is concluded that the standard has provided a clear distinction between the terms ‘error’ and ‘human error’ while being consistent in the use of the term ‘error’. However, it gives limited guidance on how to separate and collect different types of human error, such as mistakes, slips and lapses, making this largely an interpretation issue. Nevertheless, applying ISO 14224 will provide data for learning about the role of human error in equipment failure on a sound expandable basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Selvik, Jon T. & Bellamy, Linda J., 2020. "Addressing human error when collecting failure cause information in the oil and gas industry: A review of ISO 14224:2016," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0951832018311062
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018311062
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Di Pasquale, Valentina & Miranda, Salvatore & Iannone, Raffaele & Riemma, Stefano, 2015. "A Simulator for Human Error Probability Analysis (SHERPA)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 17-32.
    2. M. Elisabeth Paté‐Cornell & Robert G. Bea, 1992. "Management Errors and System Reliability: A Probabilistic Approach and Application to Offshore Platforms," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Fuqun Huang, 2017. "Human Error Analysis in Software Engineering," Chapters, in: Fabio De Felice & Antonella Petrillo (ed.), Theory and Application on Cognitive Factors and Risk Management - New Trends and Procedures, IntechOpen.
    4. Kariuki, S.G. & Löwe, K., 2007. "Integrating human factors into process hazard analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(12), pages 1764-1773.
    5. Ferjencik, Milos, 2014. "IPICA_Lite—Improvements to root cause analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Raffaele Iannone & Salvatore Miranda & Stefano Riemma & Valentina Di Pasquale, 2013. "An Overview of Human Reliability Analysis Techniques in Manufacturing Operations," Chapters, in: Massimiliano M. Schiraldi (ed.), Operations Management, IntechOpen.
    7. Boring, Ronald L. & Hendrickson, Stacey M.L. & Forester, John A. & Tran, Tuan Q. & Lois, Erasmia, 2010. "Issues in benchmarking human reliability analysis methods: A literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 591-605.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jang, Inseok & Kim, Yochan & Park, Jinkyun, 2021. "Investigating the Effect of Task Complexity on the Occurrence of Human Errors observed in a Nuclear Power Plant Full-Scope Simulator," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Liu, Zengkai & Ma, Qiang & Cai, Baoping & Shi, Xuewei & Zheng, Chao & Liu, Yonghong, 2022. "Risk coupling analysis of subsea blowout accidents based on dynamic Bayesian network and NK model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Patriarca, Riccardo & Ramos, Marilia & Paltrinieri, Nicola & Massaiu, Salvatore & Costantino, Francesco & Di Gravio, Giulio & Boring, Ronald Laurids, 2020. "Human reliability analysis: Exploring the intellectual structure of a research field," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Bolton, Matthew L. & Zheng, Xi & Kang, Eunsuk, 2021. "A formal method for including the probability of erroneous human task behavior in system analyses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. M. Elisabeth Paté‐Cornell & Linda M. Lakats & Dean M. Murphy & David M. Gaba, 1997. "Anesthesia Patient Risk: A Quantitative Approach to Organizational Factors and Risk Management Options," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 511-523, August.
    5. Dimitrina S. Dimitrova & Vladimir K. Kaishev & Shouqi Zhao, 2015. "Modeling Finite‐Time Failure Probabilities in Risk Analysis Applications," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(10), pages 1919-1939, October.
    6. Di Pasquale, Valentina & Miranda, Salvatore & Iannone, Raffaele & Riemma, Stefano, 2015. "A Simulator for Human Error Probability Analysis (SHERPA)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 17-32.
    7. Maturana, Marcos Coelho & Martins, Marcelo Ramos & Frutuoso e Melo, Paulo Fernando Ferreira, 2021. "Application of a quantitative human performance model to the operational procedure design of a fuel storage pool cooling system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. Park, Jinkyun & Jung, Wondea, 2015. "Comparing cultural profiles of MCR operators with those of non-MCR operators working in domestic Nuclear Power Plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 146-156.
    9. Chen, Yuanjiang & Feng, Wei & Jiang, Zhiqiang & Duan, Lingling & Cheng, Shuangyi, 2021. "An accident causation model based on safety information cognition and its application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Park, Jinkyun & Jung, Jae-Yoon & Jung, Wondea, 2016. "The use of a process mining technique to characterize the work process of main control room crews: A feasibility study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 31-41.
    11. A. Azadeh & M. Khakestani & S. Motevali Haghighi & A. Arjmand & Z. Jiryaei Sharahi, 2017. "A unique intelligent algorithm for optimization of human reliability and decision styles: a large petrochemical plant," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1161-1176, November.
    12. Catelani, Marcantonio & Ciani, Lorenzo & Guidi, Giulia & Patrizi, Gabriele, 2021. "An enhanced SHERPA (E-SHERPA) method for human reliability analysis in railway engineering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    13. He, Ye & Kuai, Nian-Sheng & Deng, Li-Min & He, Xiong-Yuan, 2021. "A method for assessing Human Error Probability through physiological and psychological factors tests based on CREAM and its applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    14. Zhang, Xiaoge & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Lau, Nathan & Weinger, Matthew B., 2020. "Multi-source information fusion to assess control room operator performance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    15. George M. Gray & Jon C. Allen & David E. Burmaster & Stuart H. Gage & James K. Hammitt & Stanley Kaplan & Ralph L. Keeney & Joseph G. Morse & D. Warner North & Jan P. Nyrop & Alina Stahevitch & Richar, 1998. "Principles for Conduct of Pest Risk Analyses: Report of an Expert Work hop," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 773-780, December.
    16. Theophilus, Stephen C. & Esenowo, Victor N. & Arewa, Andrew O. & Ifelebuegu, Augustine O. & Nnadi, Ernest O. & Mbanaso, Fredrick U., 2017. "Human factors analysis and classification system for the oil and gas industry (HFACS-OGI)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 168-176.
    17. Sook Shuen Yeong & Abdul Wahab Shah Rollah, 2016. "The Mediating Effect of Safety Culture on Safety Communication and Human Factor Accident at the Workplace," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 127-127, December.
    18. Burns, Kevin & Bonaceto, Craig, 2020. "An empirically benchmarked human reliability analysis of general aviation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    19. Faiella, Giuliana & Parand, Anam & Franklin, Bryony Dean & Chana, Prem & Cesarelli, Mario & Stanton, Neville A. & Sevdalis, Nick, 2018. "Expanding healthcare failure mode and effect analysis: A composite proactive risk analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 117-126.
    20. Dina Guglielmi & Alessio Paolucci & Valerio Cozzani & Marco Giovanni Mariani & Luca Pietrantoni & Federico Fraboni, 2022. "Integrating Human Barriers in Human Reliability Analysis: A New Model for the Energy Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0951832018311062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.