IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v190y2019ic21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PHM experimental design for effective state separation using Jensen–Shannon divergence

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Taejin
  • Lee, Gueseok
  • Youn, Byeng D.

Abstract

The most critical aspect in system condition diagnosis is to be aware of the signal change as the system degrades and to classify the signal into a proper state. Most condition diagnosis studies to date have focused on accurate classification of the tangled data set; these studies have paid less attention to experimental design, which could determine the quality of the signal. This study deals with experimental design for condition diagnosis that allows data separation between different health conditions in the sensing step. Data separation helps reduce the cost of follow-up data processing, such as classifier development. For this purpose, an experimental design method is proposed from an information theoretic point of view to find the sensing locations that give the best information for data separation. To measure the goodness of the design point, the Jensen–Shannon (JS) divergence is adopted as the utility function. The JS divergence is relevant to condition diagnosis in three ways. First, the JS divergence is good at measuring the separation of two distributions, which is the desired property for condition diagnosis. Second, the boundedness of the JS divergence enables balanced separation between the states. Third, the symmetric property of the JS divergence is relevant for measurement of the overall separation of the distance between states. With the JS divergence as the utility function, the greedy algorithm with the Gaussian process is used for efficient optimization. The greedy algorithm chooses one design point at a time. The required computation increases linearly with the number of sensors. At each optimization iteration, the joint distribution is required for calculating the JS divergence; the Gaussian process allows the JS divergence to be found by only calculating the univariate distribution for the newly added measuring location and the previously constructed joint distribution for the existing measurement locations. Finally, the proposed method is validated through two case studies: one is a simple mathematical problem that is provided to show the general effectiveness of JS divergence and the overall process of the proposed method; the other examines gearbox condition diagnosis to examine the use of the JS divergence in a practical application.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Taejin & Lee, Gueseok & Youn, Byeng D., 2019. "PHM experimental design for effective state separation using Jensen–Shannon divergence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:190:y:2019:i:c:21
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018311426
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Compare, Michele & Bellani, Luca & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Reliability model of a component equipped with PHM capabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 4-11.
    2. Xia, Tangbin & Dong, Yifan & Xiao, Lei & Du, Shichang & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2018. "Recent advances in prognostics and health management for advanced manufacturing paradigms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 255-268.
    3. P. Sebastiani & H. P. Wynn, 2000. "Maximum entropy sampling and optimal Bayesian experimental design," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(1), pages 145-157.
    4. Hu, Chao & Youn, Byeng D. & Wang, Pingfeng & Taek Yoon, Joung, 2012. "Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 120-135.
    5. Liu, W.Y. & Tang, B.P. & Han, J.G. & Lu, X.N. & Hu, N.N. & He, Z.Z., 2015. "The structure healthy condition monitoring and fault diagnosis methods in wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 466-472.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhenyu He & Xiaochen Zhang & Chao Liu & Te Han, 2020. "Fault Prognostics for Photovoltaic Inverter Based on Fast Clustering Algorithm and Gaussian Mixture Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jain, Amit Kumar & Lad, Bhupesh Kumar, 2020. "Prognosticating RULs while exploiting the future characteristics of operating profiles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Hu, Yang & Miao, Xuewen & Si, Yong & Pan, Ershun & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and health management: A review from the perspectives of design, development and decision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Hessa Al-Thani & Jon Lee, 2020. "An R Package for Generating Covariance Matrices for Maximum-Entropy Sampling from Precipitation Chemistry Data," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Chen, Xuejun & Yang, Yongming & Cui, Zhixin & Shen, Jun, 2019. "Vibration fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on variational mode decomposition and energy entropy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1100-1109.
    5. Ta, Yuntian & Li, Yanfeng & Cai, Wenan & Zhang, Qianqian & Wang, Zhijian & Dong, Lei & Du, Wenhua, 2023. "Adaptive staged remaining useful life prediction method based on multi-sensor and multi-feature fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Xiao, Lei & Tang, Junxuan & Zhang, Xinghui & Bechhoefer, Eric & Ding, Siyi, 2021. "Remaining useful life prediction based on intentional noise injection and feature reconstruction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Phuc Do & Christophe Bérenguer, 2022. "Residual life-based importance measures for predictive maintenance decision-making," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 98-113, February.
    9. Zheng, Xiujuan & Fang, Huajing, 2015. "An integrated unscented kalman filter and relevance vector regression approach for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life and short-term capacity prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 74-82.
    10. Hur, S. & Recalde-Camacho, L. & Leithead, W.E., 2017. "Detection and compensation of anomalous conditions in a wind turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 74-86.
    11. Gao, Q.W. & Liu, W.Y. & Tang, B.P. & Li, G.J., 2018. "A novel wind turbine fault diagnosis method based on intergral extension load mean decomposition multiscale entropy and least squares support vector machine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 169-175.
    12. Xiao, Lei & Zhang, Xinghui & Tang, Junxuan & Zhou, Yaqin, 2020. "Joint optimization of opportunistic maintenance and production scheduling considering batch production mode and varying operational conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Cao, Mengda & Zhang, Tao & Liu, Yajie & Zhang, Yajun & Wang, Yu & Li, Kaiwen, 2022. "An ensemble learning prognostic method for capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on the V-IOWGA operator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    14. Shen, Sheng & Sadoughi, Mohammadkazem & Li, Meng & Wang, Zhengdao & Hu, Chao, 2020. "Deep convolutional neural networks with ensemble learning and transfer learning for capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    15. Wen, Pengfei & Zhao, Shuai & Chen, Shaowei & Li, Yong, 2021. "A generalized remaining useful life prediction method for complex systems based on composite health indicator," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    16. Ibrahim, Muhammad Sohail & Dong, Wei & Yang, Qiang, 2020. "Machine learning driven smart electric power systems: Current trends and new perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    17. Chien-Chang Hsu & Min-Sheng Chen, 2016. "Intelligent maintenance prediction system for LED wafer testing machine," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 335-342, April.
    18. Cheng, Yujie & Song, Dengwei & Wang, Zhenya & Lu, Chen & Zerhouni, Noureddine, 2020. "An ensemble prognostic method for lithium-ion battery capacity estimation based on time-varying weight allocation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    19. Ali Rohan, 2022. "Holistic Fault Detection and Diagnosis System in Imbalanced, Scarce, Multi-Domain (ISMD) Data Setting for Component-Level Prognostics and Health Management (PHM)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, June.
    20. Wu, Shaomin & Do, Phuc, 2017. "Editorial," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-3.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:190:y:2019:i:c:21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.