IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v189y2019icp242-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical probability and risk assessment for K-out-of-N system in hierarchy

Author

Listed:
  • Ye, Xiong-Fei
  • Zhang, Yi
  • Harutoshi, Ogai
  • Kim, Chul-Woo

Abstract

In this research, the model of hierarchical structure from universe theory is imported into the general probability system which helps logically and subordinately describing, measuring, and evaluating the hierarchical probabilistic system. To clearly classify the hierarchy, “fayer†is proposed as the unit of hierarchy. Then, discussions on the relationship between hierarchy and system-of-systems and the risks caused by the hierarchy are proposed. This paper divides the problems of hierarchical probability mainly into two classes: the problems of surviving ratio and problems of passing ratio, and also, mixed problems of surviving ratio and passing ratio. Simultaneously, the surviving ratio is called as reliability. System reliability is one marked kind of hierarchical probability for the risk assessment of the hierarchical system. This paper introduces a new reliability system, P-out-of-1 system, which is derived from the K-out-of-N systems in hierarchy. The hierarchical reliability calculation of every fayer of the P-out-of-1 system is different from other fayers. Furthermore, the risk assessment of the hierarchical system for decision making of one maintenance manifests many differences by different descriptions in different fayers, even these descriptions concentrate on the same system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye, Xiong-Fei & Zhang, Yi & Harutoshi, Ogai & Kim, Chul-Woo, 2019. "Hierarchical probability and risk assessment for K-out-of-N system in hierarchy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 242-260.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:189:y:2019:i:c:p:242-260
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018308548
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles J. Kowalski, 1972. "On the Effects of Non‐Normality on the Distribution of the Sample Product‐Moment Correlation Coefficient," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 21(1), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Prashanthi Boddu & Liudong Xing, 2013. "Reliability evaluation and optimization of series–parallel systems with k-out-of-n: G subsystems and mixed redundancy types," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(2), pages 187-198, April.
    3. Coit, David W. & Chatwattanasiri, Nida & Wattanapongsakorn, Naruemon & Konak, Abdullah, 2015. "Dynamic k-out-of-n system reliability with component partnership," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 82-92.
    4. Wang, Wenbin & Banjevic, Dragan & Pecht, Michael, 2010. "A multi-component and multi-failure mode inspection model based on the delay time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 912-920.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Du, Yi-Mu & Sun, C.P., 2022. "A novel interpretable model of bathtub hazard rate based on system hierarchy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Xiahou, Tangfan & Zheng, Yi-Xuan & Liu, Yu & Chen, Hong, 2023. "Reliability modeling of modular k-out-of-n systems with functional dependency: A case study of radar transmitter systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hajipour, Yassin & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2016. "Non-periodic inspection optimization of multi-component and k-out-of-m systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 228-243.
    2. Chen, Tianyi & Shi, Xiupeng & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2021. "A lane-changing risk profile analysis method based on time-series clustering," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    3. P A Scarf & H A Majid, 2011. "Modelling warranty extensions: a case study in the automotive industry," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 251-265, June.
    4. Feng Han & Xufu Liu & Richard B. Mailman & Xuemei Huang & Xiao Liu, 2023. "Resting-state global brain activity affects early β-amyloid accumulation in default mode network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Sharp, Alanna & Andrade, Jose & Ruffini, Nicholas, 2019. "Design for reliability for the high reliability fuze," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 54-61.
    6. Flage, Roger, 2014. "A delay time model with imperfect and failure-inducing inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Si, Shubin & Levitin, Gregory & Dui, Hongyan & Sun, Shudong, 2014. "Importance analysis for reconfigurable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 72-80.
    8. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Okoh, Marvin & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Assessing technology legitimacy with topic models and sentiment analysis – The case of wind power in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Wang, Wenbin & Syntetos, Aris A., 2011. "Spare parts demand: Linking forecasting to equipment maintenance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1194-1209.
    10. Wang, Wenbin & Banjevic, Dragan, 2012. "Ergodicity of forward times of the renewal process in a block-based inspection model using the delay time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-7.
    11. Wang, Wenbin, 2011. "A joint spare part and maintenance inspection optimisation model using the Delay-Time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1535-1541.
    12. Peiravi, Abdossaber & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Zanjani, Masoumeh Kazemi, 2022. "Redundancy strategies assessment and optimization of k-out-of-n systems based on Markov chains and genetic algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Wang, Wenbin, 2011. "An inspection model based on a three-stage failure process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 838-848.
    14. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2014. "Optimal component loading in 1-out-of-N cold standby systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 58-64.
    15. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    16. Xu, Dong & Tian, Yubin & Shi, Junbiao & Wang, Dianpeng & Zhang, Ming & Li, Haijin, 2023. "Reliability analysis and optimal redundancy for a satellite power supply system based on a new dynamic k-out-of-n: G model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    17. Lam, Ji Ye Janet & Banjevic, Dragan, 2015. "A myopic policy for optimal inspection scheduling for condition based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-11.
    18. Zhu, Wenjin & Fouladirad, Mitra & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2016. "A multi-level maintenance policy for a multi-component and multifailure mode system with two independent failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 50-63.
    19. Cong Lin & Lirong Cui & David Coit & Min Lv, 2017. "An approximation method for evaluating the reliability of a dynamic k-out-of-n:F system subjected to cyclic alternating operation conditions," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(2), pages 109-120, April.
    20. Shekhar, Chandra & Kumar, Neeraj & Gupta, Amit & Kumar, Amit & Varshney, Shreekant, 2020. "Warm-spare provisioning computing network with switching failure, common cause failure, vacation interruption, and synchronized reneging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:189:y:2019:i:c:p:242-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.