IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v124y2014icp1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A delay time model with imperfect and failure-inducing inspections

Author

Listed:
  • Flage, Roger

Abstract

This paper presents an inspection-based maintenance optimisation model where the inspections are imperfect and potentially failure-inducing. The model is based on the basic delay-time model in which a system has three states: perfectly functioning, defective and failed. The system is deteriorating through these states and to reveal defective systems, inspections are performed periodically using a procedure by which the system fails with a fixed state-dependent probability; otherwise, an inspection identifies a functioning system as defective (false positive) with a fixed probability and a defective system as functioning (false negative) with a fixed probability. The system is correctively replaced upon failure or preventively replaced either at the N'th inspection time or when an inspection reveals the system as defective, whichever occurs first. Replacement durations are assumed to be negligible and costs are associated with inspections, replacements and failures. The problem is to determine the optimal inspection interval T and preventive age replacement limit N that jointly minimise the long run expected cost per unit of time. The system may also be thought of as a passive two-state system subject to random demands; the three states of the model are then functioning, undetected failed and detected failed; and to ensure the renewal property of replacement cycles the demand process generating the ‘delay time’ is then restricted to the Poisson process. The inspiration for the presented model has been passive safety critical valves as used in (offshore) oil and gas production and transportation systems. In light of this the passive system interpretation is highlighted, as well as the possibility that inspection-induced failures are associated with accidents. Two numerical examples are included, and some potential extensions of the model are indicated.

Suggested Citation

  • Flage, Roger, 2014. "A delay time model with imperfect and failure-inducing inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-12.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:124:y:2014:i:c:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832013003062
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baker, R. D. & Christer, A. H., 1994. "Review of delay-time OR modelling of engineering aspects of maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 407-422, March.
    2. Wang, Wenbin, 2009. "An inspection model for a process with two types of inspections and repairs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 526-533.
    3. Wang, Wenbin, 2011. "An inspection model based on a three-stage failure process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 838-848.
    4. Vatn, Jørn & Aven, Terje, 2010. "An approach to maintenance optimization where safety issues are important," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 58-63.
    5. Wang, Wenbin & Banjevic, Dragan, 2012. "Ergodicity of forward times of the renewal process in a block-based inspection model using the delay time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-7.
    6. Berrade, M.D. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Scarf, Philip A., 2012. "Maintenance scheduling of a protection system subject to imperfect inspection and replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 716-725.
    7. Pham, Hoang & Wang, Hongzhou, 1996. "Imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 425-438, November.
    8. Christophe Bérenguer & Antoine Grall & C. Guedes Soares, 2011. "Advances in Safety, Reliability and Risk Management - ESREL 2011," Post-Print hal-02273237, HAL.
    9. Christer, A. H. & Redmond, D. F., 1992. "Revising models of maintenance and inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 227-234, March.
    10. A H Christer, 1999. "Developments in delay time analysis for modelling plant maintenance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(11), pages 1120-1137, November.
    11. Wang, Wenbin & Banjevic, Dragan & Pecht, Michael, 2010. "A multi-component and multi-failure mode inspection model based on the delay time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 912-920.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Li & Ma, Xiaobing & Zhai, Qingqing & Zhao, Yu, 2016. "A delay time model for a mission-based system subject to periodic and random inspection and postponed replacement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 96-104.
    2. de Jonge, Bram & Klingenberg, Warse & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2016. "Reducing costs by clustering maintenance activities for multiple critical units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 93-103.
    3. Alberti, Alexandre R. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Scarf, Philip & Silva, André L.O., 2018. "Modelling inspection and replacement quality for a protection system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 145-153.
    4. Alberti, Alexandre R. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V., 2020. "A two-scale maintenance policy for protection systems subject to shocks when meeting demands," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Francisco Germán Badía & María Dolores Berrade, 2022. "On the Residual Lifetime and Inactivity Time in Mixtures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Zhang, Fengxia & Shen, Jingyuan & Liao, Haitao & Ma, Yizhong, 2021. "Optimal preventive maintenance policy for a system subject to two-phase imperfect inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Li Yang & Yu Zhao & Xiaobing Ma & Qingan Qiu, 2018. "An optimal inspection and replacement policy for a two-unit system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 766-776, December.
    8. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    9. Peng, Rui & Liu, Bin & Zhai, Qingqing & Wang, Wenbin, 2019. "Optimal maintenance strategy for systems with two failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 624-632.
    10. Ajith Tom James & O. P. Gandhi & S. G. Deshmukh, 2017. "Assessment of failures in automobiles due to maintenance errors," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(4), pages 719-739, December.
    11. Yang, Li & Ma, Xiaobing & Peng, Rui & Zhai, Qingqing & Zhao, Yu, 2017. "A preventive maintenance policy based on dependent two-stage deterioration and external shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 201-211.
    12. Zhao, Qian Qian & Yun, Won Young, 2019. "Storage availability of one-shot system under periodic inspection considering inspection error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 120-133.
    13. Akcay, Alp, 2022. "An alert-assisted inspection policy for a production process with imperfect condition signals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 510-525.
    14. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    15. Wang, Jiantai & Ma, Xiaobing & Yang, Li & Qiu, Qingan & Shang, Lijun & Wang, Jingjing, 2024. "A hybrid inspection-replacement policy for multi-stage degradation considering imperfect inspection with variable probabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Zhang, Fengxia & Shen, Jingyuan & Ma, Yizhong, 2020. "Optimal maintenance policy considering imperfect repairs and non-constant probabilities of inspection errors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Sheu, Shey-Huei & Tsai, Hsin-Nan & Wang, Fu-Kwun & Zhang, Zhe George, 2015. "An extended optimal replacement model for a deteriorating system with inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 33-49.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    2. Wang, Wenbin & Zhao, Fei & Peng, Rui, 2014. "A preventive maintenance model with a two-level inspection policy based on a three-stage failure process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 207-220.
    3. Zhang, Fengxia & Shen, Jingyuan & Liao, Haitao & Ma, Yizhong, 2021. "Optimal preventive maintenance policy for a system subject to two-phase imperfect inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Seyedhosseini, Seyed Mohammad & Moakedi, Hamid & Shahanaghi, Kamran, 2018. "Imperfect inspection optimization for a two-component system subject to hidden and two-stage revealed failures over a finite time horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 141-156.
    5. Peng, Rui & Liu, Bin & Zhai, Qingqing & Wang, Wenbin, 2019. "Optimal maintenance strategy for systems with two failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 624-632.
    6. Xuejuan Liu & Wenbin Wang & Rui Peng & Fei Zhao, 2015. "A delay-time-based inspection model for parallel systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(6), pages 556-567, December.
    7. Wang, Wenbin & Banjevic, Dragan, 2012. "Ergodicity of forward times of the renewal process in a block-based inspection model using the delay time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-7.
    8. Wang, Wenbin, 2011. "An inspection model based on a three-stage failure process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 838-848.
    9. Aven, Terje & Castro, I.T., 2009. "A delay-time model with safety constraint," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 261-267.
    10. Yang, Li & Ma, Xiaobing & Zhai, Qingqing & Zhao, Yu, 2016. "A delay time model for a mission-based system subject to periodic and random inspection and postponed replacement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 96-104.
    11. Wang, Wenbin, 2013. "Models of inspection, routine service, and replacement for a serviceable one-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 57-63.
    12. van Oosterom, C.D. & Elwany, A.H. & Çelebi, D. & van Houtum, G.J., 2014. "Optimal policies for a delay time model with postponed replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 186-197.
    13. C. Drent & S. Kapodistria & J. A. C. Resing, 2019. "Condition-based maintenance policies under imperfect maintenance at scheduled and unscheduled opportunities," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 269-308, December.
    14. P A Scarf & H A Majid, 2011. "Modelling warranty extensions: a case study in the automotive industry," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 251-265, June.
    15. Wang, Wenbin & Banjevic, Dragan & Pecht, Michael, 2010. "A multi-component and multi-failure mode inspection model based on the delay time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 912-920.
    16. Hajipour, Yassin & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2016. "Non-periodic inspection optimization of multi-component and k-out-of-m systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 228-243.
    17. Alberti, Alexandre R. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Scarf, Philip & Silva, André L.O., 2018. "Modelling inspection and replacement quality for a protection system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 145-153.
    18. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    19. Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Lopes, R.S. & Scarf, P.A., 2018. "A general inspection and opportunistic replacement policy for one-component systems of variable quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 911-919.
    20. Wang, Wenbin & Syntetos, Aris A., 2011. "Spare parts demand: Linking forecasting to equipment maintenance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1194-1209.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:124:y:2014:i:c:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.