IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v186y2019icp37-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety analysis for vehicle guidance systems with dynamic fault trees

Author

Listed:
  • Ghadhab, Majdi
  • Junges, Sebastian
  • Katoen, Joost-Pieter
  • Kuntz, Matthias
  • Volk, Matthias

Abstract

This paper considers the design-phase safety analysis of vehicle guidance systems. The proposed approach constructs dynamic fault trees (DFTs) to model a variety of safety concepts and E/E architectures for drive automation. The fault trees can be used to evaluate various quantitative measures by means of model checking. The approach is accompanied by a large-scale evaluation: The resulting DFTs with up to 300 elements constitute larger-than-before DFTs, yet the concepts and architectures can be evaluated in a matter of minutes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghadhab, Majdi & Junges, Sebastian & Katoen, Joost-Pieter & Kuntz, Matthias & Volk, Matthias, 2019. "Safety analysis for vehicle guidance systems with dynamic fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 37-50.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:186:y:2019:i:c:p:37-50
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018304770
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaiser, Bernhard & Gramlich, Catharina & Förster, Marc, 2007. "State/event fault trees—A safety analysis model for software-controlled systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(11), pages 1521-1537.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pauer, Gábor & Török, à rpád, 2022. "Introducing a novel safety assessment method through the example of a reduced complexity binary integer autonomous transport model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Huang, Chao & Li, Liang, 2020. "Architectural design and analysis of a steer-by-wire system in view of functional safety concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Chen, Xi & Bose, Neil & Brito, Mario & Khan, Faisal & Thanyamanta, Bo & Zou, Ting, 2021. "A Review of Risk Analysis Research for the Operations of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Zhou, Siwei & Ye, Luyao & Xiong, Shengwu & Xiang, Jianwen, 2022. "Reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees with Priority-AND gates based on irrelevance coverage model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruijters, Enno & Reijsbergen, Daniël & de Boer, Pieter-Tjerk & Stoelinga, Mariëlle, 2019. "Rare event simulation for dynamic fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 220-231.
    2. Wu, Daohua & Zheng, Wei, 2018. "Formal model-based quantitative safety analysis using timed Coloured Petri Nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 62-79.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:186:y:2019:i:c:p:37-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.