IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v152y2016icp339-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-based optimisation of fire safety egress provisions based on the LQI acceptance criterion

Author

Listed:
  • De Sanctis, Gianluca
  • Fontana, Mario

Abstract

Life safety is the primary objective of fire safety design and is mainly ensured by an appropriate design of the means of egress, which reduce the risk to life. An unlimited reduction of this risk is not desirable since it would lead to an immense investment of resources. The Life Quality Index (LQI) acceptance criterion is a societal indicator that is used to judge the efficiency of safety measures to reduce the risk to life and can be used to optimise the investments into life saving measures. The risk is assessed by a probabilistic engineering approach that considers the fire development and the individual-based evacuation process as well as the associated uncertainties. Advanced uncertainty propagation methods are applied in order to face the difficulties by using computational expensive models and by using individual-based models. Sensitivity measures are applied to reveal the contribution of the uncertainties on the estimation of the risk. The approach is applied for a risk-based optimisation of the minimal required door width for retail buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • De Sanctis, Gianluca & Fontana, Mario, 2016. "Risk-based optimisation of fire safety egress provisions based on the LQI acceptance criterion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 339-350.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:152:y:2016:i:c:p:339-350
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.04.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016300151
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2016.04.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blatman, Géraud & Sudret, Bruno, 2010. "Efficient computation of global sensitivity indices using sparse polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1216-1229.
    2. Armin Seyfried & Oliver Passon & Bernhard Steffen & Maik Boltes & Tobias Rupprecht & Wolfram Klingsch, 2009. "New Insights into Pedestrian Flow Through Bottlenecks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 395-406, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Changkun & Sun, Huakai & Lei, Peng & Zhao, Dongyue & Shi, Congling, 2021. "An extended model for crowd evacuation considering pedestrian panic in artificial attack," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    2. Sibdari, Soheil & Mohammadian, Iman & Pyke, David F., 2018. "On the impact of jet fuel cost on airlines’ capacity choice: Evidence from the U.S. domestic markets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1-17.
    3. Drignei, Dorin, 2011. "A general statistical model for computer experiments with time series output," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 460-467.
    4. Cao, Shuchao & Lian, Liping & Chen, Mingyi & Yao, Ming & Song, Weiguo & Fang, Zhiming, 2018. "Investigation of difference of fundamental diagrams in pedestrian flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 661-670.
    5. Krbálek, Milan & Hrabák, Pavel & Bukáček, Marek, 2018. "Pedestrian headways — Reflection of territorial social forces," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 38-49.
    6. Cheng, Kai & Lu, Zhenzhou, 2018. "Sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on D-MORPH regression," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 17-30.
    7. Lian, Liping & Song, Weiguo & Yuen, Kwok Kit Richard & Telesca, Luciano, 2018. "Investigating the time evolution of some parameters describing inflow processes of pedestrians in a room," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 507(C), pages 77-88.
    8. Zhai, Qingqing & Yang, Jun & Zhao, Yu, 2014. "Space-partition method for the variance-based sensitivity analysis: Optimal partition scheme and comparative study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 66-82.
    9. Wang, Jiayue & Boltes, Maik & Seyfried, Armin & Zhang, Jun & Ziemer, Verena & Weng, Wenguo, 2018. "Linking pedestrian flow characteristics with stepping locomotion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 500(C), pages 106-120.
    10. Brown, S. & Beck, J. & Mahgerefteh, H. & Fraga, E.S., 2013. "Global sensitivity analysis of the impact of impurities on CO2 pipeline failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 43-54.
    11. Pronzato, Luc, 2019. "Sensitivity analysis via Karhunen–Loève expansion of a random field model: Estimation of Sobol’ indices and experimental design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 93-109.
    12. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid & Shahhoseini, Zahra, 2019. "When ‘push’ does not come to ‘shove’: Revisiting ‘faster is slower’ in collective egress of human crowds," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 51-69.
    13. Oladyshkin, S. & Nowak, W., 2012. "Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 179-190.
    14. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.
    15. Ziyou Gao & Yunchao Qu & Xingang Li & Jiancheng Long & Hai-Jun Huang, 2014. "Simulating the Dynamic Escape Process in Large Public Places," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1344-1357, December.
    16. Deman, G. & Kerrou, J. & Benabderrahmane, H. & Perrochet, P., 2015. "Sensitivity analysis of groundwater lifetime expectancy to hydro-dispersive parameters: The case of ANDRA Meuse/Haute-Marne site," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 276-286.
    17. Mohd Ibrahim, Azhar & Venkat, Ibrahim & Wilde, Philippe De, 2017. "Uncertainty in a spatial evacuation model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 485-497.
    18. Shang, Pan & Li, Ruimin & Guo, Jifu & Xian, Kai & Zhou, Xuesong, 2019. "Integrating Lagrangian and Eulerian observations for passenger flow state estimation in an urban rail transit network: A space-time-state hyper network-based assignment approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 135-167.
    19. Huang, Shenshi & Zhang, Teng & Lo, Siuming & Lu, Shouxiang & Li, Changhai, 2018. "Experimental study of individual and single-file pedestrian movement in narrow seat aisle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 1023-1033.
    20. Liu, Yaning & Yousuff Hussaini, M. & Ökten, Giray, 2016. "Accurate construction of high dimensional model representation with applications to uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 281-295.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:152:y:2016:i:c:p:339-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.