IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v152y2016icp259-272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining and verifying the safety integrity level of the safety instrumented systems with the uncertainty and security aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Piesik, E.
  • ÅšliwiÅ„ski, M.
  • Barnert, T.

Abstract

Safety and security aspects consist of two different group of functional requirements for the control and protection systems. In the paper it is proposed that the security analysis results can be used as a factor increasing or decreasing the risk level. It concerns a process of determining required safety integrity level of given safety functions. The authors propose a new approach for functional safety risk analysis. In this case the security factor influences the value of required safety integrity level SIL by changing the frequency of accident scenario. It can be done by using the methodology of modified risk graph. On the other hand there is a verification of required SIL fulfillment for designed safety-related system which implements safety function. In this case the result of security analysis is affecting uncertainty of probabilistic model parameters. The proposed method takes into consideration the sensitivity analysis of probabilistic models of E/E/PE or safety instrumented systems SIS as well as the uncertainty of probabilistic results. It uses differential factors, which are helpful for effective verification of required SIL of the E/E/PE or SIS systems taking into account results of sensitivity analysis and/or assessment of uncertainty ranges obtained from probabilistic models developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Piesik, E. & ÅšliwiÅ„ski, M. & Barnert, T., 2016. "Determining and verifying the safety integrity level of the safety instrumented systems with the uncertainty and security aspects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 259-272.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:152:y:2016:i:c:p:259-272
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016300084
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piwowar, Julien & Châtelet, Eric & Laclémence, Patrick, 2009. "An efficient process to reduce infrastructure vulnerabilities facing malevolence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1869-1877.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ievgen Babeshko & Oleg Illiashenko & Vyacheslav Kharchenko & Kostiantyn Leontiev, 2022. "Towards Trustworthy Safety Assessment by Providing Expert and Tool-Based XMECA Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Marek Jabłoński & Adam Jabłoński, 2021. "Shaping the Safety Culture of High Reliability Organizations through Digital Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Misuri, Alessio & Landucci, Gabriele & Cozzani, Valerio, 2021. "Assessment of safety barrier performance in the mitigation of domino scenarios caused by Natech events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Hossam A. Gabbar & Yahya Koraz, 2017. "Risk Assessment of Micro Energy Grid Protection Layers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. R. Wang & N. Pedroni & E. Zio & V. Mousseau, 2020. "Identification of Protective Actions to Reduce the Vulnerability of Safety‐Critical Systems to Malevolent Intentional Acts: An Optimization‐Based Decision‐Making Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 565-587, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:152:y:2016:i:c:p:259-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.