IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v140y2015icp53-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extending minimal repair models for repairable systems: A comparison of dynamic and heterogeneous extensions of a nonhomogeneous Poisson process

Author

Listed:
  • Asfaw, Zeytu Gashaw
  • Lindqvist, Bo Henry

Abstract

For many applications of repairable systems, the minimal repair assumption, which leads to nonhomogeneous Poisson processes (NHPP), is not adequate. We review and study two extensions of the NHPP, the dynamic NHPP and the heterogeneous NHPP. Both extensions are motivated by specific aspects of potential applications. It has long been known, however, that the two paradigms are essentially indistinguishable in an analysis of failure data. We investigate the connection between the two approaches for extending NHPP models, both theoretically and numerically in a data example and a simulation study.

Suggested Citation

  • Asfaw, Zeytu Gashaw & Lindqvist, Bo Henry, 2015. "Extending minimal repair models for repairable systems: A comparison of dynamic and heterogeneous extensions of a nonhomogeneous Poisson process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 53-58.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:140:y:2015:i:c:p:53-58
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015000915
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asfaw, Zeytu Gashaw & Lindqvist, Bo Henry, 2015. "Unobserved heterogeneity in the power law nonhomogeneous Poisson process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 59-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2016. "Justifying the Gompertz curve of mortality via the generalized Polya process of shocks," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 54-62.
    2. Zhou, Xiaojun & Wu, Changjie & Li, Yanting & Xi, Lifeng, 2016. "A preventive maintenance model for leased equipment subject to internal degradation and external shock damage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-7.
    3. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2017. "Two new stochastic models of the failure process of a series system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 763-772.
    4. Chien, Yu-Hung, 2019. "The optimal preventive-maintenance policy for a NHPBP repairable system under free-repair warranty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 444-453.
    5. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2018. "On a New Shot Noise Process and the Induced Survival Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 897-917, September.
    6. Francisco Germán Badía & Sophie Mercier & Carmen Sangüesa, 2019. "Extensions of the Generalized Pólya Process," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1057-1085, December.
    7. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2016. "New shock models based on the generalized Polya process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 135-141.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bodunrin Brown & Bin Liu & Stuart McIntyre & Matthew Revie, 2023. "Reliability evaluation of repairable systems considering component heterogeneity using frailty model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(4), pages 654-670, August.
    2. Chehade, Abdallah & Shi, Zunya & Krivtsov, Vasiliy, 2020. "Power–law nonhomogeneous Poisson process with a mixture of latent common shape parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Rezgar Zaki & Abbas Barabadi & Javad Barabady & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou, 2022. "Observed and unobserved heterogeneity in failure data analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 194-207, February.
    4. Almeida, Marco Pollo & Paixão, Rafael S. & Ramos, Pedro L. & Tomazella, Vera & Louzada, Francisco & Ehlers, Ricardo S., 2020. "Bayesian non-parametric frailty model for dependent competing risks in a repairable systems framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Slimacek, Vaclav & Lindqvist, Bo Henry, 2016. "Nonhomogeneous Poisson process with nonparametric frailty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 14-23.
    6. Rezgar Zaki & Abbas Barabadi & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & A. H. S. Garmabaki, 2019. "A mixture frailty model for maintainability analysis of mechanical components: a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(6), pages 1646-1653, December.
    7. Liu, Xingheng & Vatn, Jørn & Dijoux, Yann & Toftaker, Håkon, 2020. "Unobserved heterogeneity in stable imperfect repair models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Zhao, Heng & Liu, Zixian & Li, Mei & Liang, Lijun, 2022. "Optimal monitoring policies for chronic diseases under healthcare warranty," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Zhou, Yu & Kou, Gang & Xiao, Hui & Peng, Yi & Alsaadi, Fawaz E., 2020. "Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance model with failure intensity reduction with an application to urban buses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:140:y:2015:i:c:p:53-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.