IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v139y2015icp97-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stochastic alternating renewal process model for unavailability analysis of standby safety equipment

Author

Listed:
  • van der Weide, J.A.M.
  • Pandey, Mahesh D.

Abstract

The paper presents a stochastic approach to analyze instantaneous unavailability of standby safety equipment caused by latent failures. The problem of unavailability analysis is formulated as a stochastic alternating renewal process without any restrictions on the form of the probability distribution assigned to time to failure and repair duration. An integral equation for point unavailability is derived and numerically solved for a given maintenance policy. The paper also incorporates an age-based preventive maintenance policy with random repair time. In case of aging equipment, the asymptotic limit or average unavailability should be used with a caution, because it cannot model an increasing trend in unavailability as a result of increasing hazard rate (i.e. aging) of the time to failure distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • van der Weide, J.A.M. & Pandey, Mahesh D., 2015. "A stochastic alternating renewal process model for unavailability analysis of standby safety equipment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 97-104.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:139:y:2015:i:c:p:97-104
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015000630
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Xiaohu & Zuo, Ming J. & Yam, Richard C.M., 2006. "Reliability analysis of a repairable k-out-of-n system with some components being suspended when the system is down," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 305-310.
    2. John J. Coleman & I. Jack Abrams, 1962. "Mathematical Model for Operational Readiness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 126-138, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shen, Lijuan & Cassottana, Beatrice & Tang, Loon Ching, 2018. "Statistical trend tests for resilience of power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 138-147.
    2. Alberti, Alexandre R. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V., 2020. "A two-scale maintenance policy for protection systems subject to shocks when meeting demands," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Chun Su & Longfei Cheng, 2018. "An availability-based warranty policy considering preventive maintenance and learning effects," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 576-586, December.
    4. Radim Briš & Pavel Jahoda, 2022. "Really Ageing Systems Undergoing a Discrete Maintenance Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Zhao, Qian Qian & Yun, Won Young, 2018. "Determining the inspection intervals for one-shot systems with support equipment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 63-75.
    6. Chen, Ying & Wang, Ze & Li, YingYi & Kang, Rui & Mosleh, Ali, 2018. "Reliability analysis of a cold-standby system considering the development stages and accumulations of failure mechanisms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr & Goňo, Radomír & Rusek, Stanislav, 2017. "Discrete maintenance optimization of complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 80-89.
    8. Radim Briš & Petr Byczanski, 2017. "On innovative stochastic renewal process models for exact unavailability quantification of highly reliable systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(6), pages 617-627, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Linhan & Li, Ruiyang & Wang, Yu & Yang, Jun & Liu, Yu & Chen, Yiming & Zhang, Jianguo, 2023. "Availability for multi-component k-out-of-n: G warm-standby system in series with shut-off rule of suspended animation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Vasanthi T. & Arulmozhi G., 2010. "Reliability Analysis of k-out-of-n : G Repairable Shared Load Systems with Multiple Failures and Preventive Maintenance," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 25(1), pages 65-79, January.
    3. Leung, Francis Kit-nam, 2001. "Inspection schedules when the lifetime distribution of a single-unit system is completely unknown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 106-115, July.
    4. Khatab, A. & Nahas, N. & Nourelfath, M., 2009. "Availability of K-out-of-N:G systems with non-identical components subject to repair priorities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 142-151.
    5. Moghaddass, Ramin & Zuo, Ming J. & Wang, Wenbin, 2011. "Availability of a general k-out-of-n:G system with non-identical components considering shut-off rules using quasi-birth–death process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 489-496.
    6. Faghih-Roohi, Shahrzad & Xie, Min & Ng, Kien Ming & Yam, Richard C.M., 2014. "Dynamic availability assessment and optimal component design of multi-state weighted k-out-of-n systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 57-62.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:139:y:2015:i:c:p:97-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.