IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v69y2012icp66-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiobjective waste management optimization strategy coupling life cycle assessment and genetic algorithms: Application to PET bottles

Author

Listed:
  • Komly, Claude-Emma
  • Azzaro-Pantel, Catherine
  • Hubert, Antoine
  • Pibouleau, Luc
  • Archambault, Valérie

Abstract

A mathematical model based on life-cycle assessment (LCA) results is developed to assess the environmental efficiency of the end-of-life management of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles. For this purpose, multiobjective optimization and decision support tools are used to define optimal targets for efficient waste management. The global environmental impacts associated with the treatment of PET bottles from their cradle to their ultimate graves (incineration, landfill, recycling by mechanical, chemical or thermal processes) are computed in function of the flow of bottles in the different valorization paths. They are based on the calculation of the impacts involved in each elementary process with a LCA software tool, using the CML impact assessment method. The model takes into account the fraction λ of PET regenerated into bottles that can be further recycled, the global impacts being the cumulative impacts corresponding to each “end-of-life”. A nonlinear model for the bottle waste collection stage is considered, reflecting that the more diffuse the flow of bottles is, the more difficult it is to collect and consequently, the more environmentally impacting. The resulting multiobjective problem is to find the allocation of bottles between valorization paths that minimizes the environmental impacts of bottle end-of-lives. It is solved using a genetic algorithm, and the trade-off between environmental impacts is illustrated through Pareto curves. A decision support tool then determines the best compromise among the set of solutions. The model is applied to the case of France in 2010. The variables that minimize simultaneously abiotic depletion, acidification and global warming potential are determined, in particular the number of recycling loops. The approach can be easily adapted to any specific product like bio-based plastics or organic wastes to find the optimal allocation between valorization paths.

Suggested Citation

  • Komly, Claude-Emma & Azzaro-Pantel, Catherine & Hubert, Antoine & Pibouleau, Luc & Archambault, Valérie, 2012. "Multiobjective waste management optimization strategy coupling life cycle assessment and genetic algorithms: Application to PET bottles," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 66-81.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:69:y:2012:i:c:p:66-81
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344912001462
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vellini, Michela & Savioli, Michela, 2009. "Energy and environmental analysis of glass container production and recycling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2137-2143.
    2. Chilton, Tom & Burnley, Stephen & Nesaratnam, Suresh, 2010. "A life cycle assessment of the closed-loop recycling and thermal recovery of post-consumer PET," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1241-1249.
    3. Shannon M. Lloyd & Robert Ries, 2007. "Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life‐Cycle Assessment: A Survey of Quantitative Approaches," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 161-179, January.
    4. Barboza, E.S. & Lopez, D.R. & Amico, S.C. & Ferreira, C.A., 2009. "Determination of a recyclability index for the PET glycolysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 122-128.
    5. Welle, Frank, 2011. "Twenty years of PET bottle to bottle recycling—An overview," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 865-875.
    6. Shen, Li & Worrell, Ernst & Patel, Martin K., 2010. "Open-loop recycling: A LCA case study of PET bottle-to-fibre recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 34-52.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Hammad Mushtaq & Fahad Noor & M. A. Mujtaba & Salman Asghar & Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf & Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar & Abrar Hussain & Mohamed Fathy Badran & Kiran Shahapurkar, 2022. "Environmental Performance of Alternative Hospital Waste Management Strategies Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Nakatani, Jun & Konno, Kiyoto & Moriguchi, Yuichi, 2017. "Variability-based optimal design for robust plastic recycling systems," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 53-60.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lagioia, Giovanni & Calabrò, Grazia & Amicarelli, Vera, 2012. "Empirical study of the environmental management of Italy's drinking water supply," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 119-130.
    2. Coelho, T.M. & Castro, R. & Gobbo, J.A., 2011. "PET containers in Brazil: Opportunities and challenges of a logistics model for post-consumer waste recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 291-299.
    3. Christian Moretti & Blanca Corona & Robert Edwards & Martin Junginger & Alberto Moro & Matteo Rocco & Li Shen, 2020. "Reviewing ISO Compliant Multifunctionality Practices in Environmental Life Cycle Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Yuantao Peng & Jie Yang & Chenqiang Deng & Jin Deng & Li Shen & Yao Fu, 2023. "Acetolysis of waste polyethylene terephthalate for upcycling and life-cycle assessment study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Stefano Cucurachi & Carlos Felipe Blanco & Bernhard Steubing & Reinout Heijungs, 2022. "Implementation of uncertainty analysis and moment‐independent global sensitivity analysis for full‐scale life cycle assessment models," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 374-391, April.
    6. Amornchai Challcharoenwattana & Chanathip Pharino, 2015. "Co-Benefits of Household Waste Recycling for Local Community’s Sustainable Waste Management in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Mochamad Arief Budihardjo & Natasya Ghinna Humaira & Soraya Annisa Putri & Bimastyaji Surya Ramadan & Syafrudin Syafrudin & Eflita Yohana, 2021. "Sustainable Solid Waste Management Strategies for Higher Education Institutions: Diponegoro University, Indonesia Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Khounani, Zahra & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Sulaiman, Alawi & Goli, Sayed Amir Hossein & Tavassoli-Kafrani, Elham & Ghaffari, Akram & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Kim, Ki-Hyun, 2020. "Unlocking the potential of walnut husk extract in the production of waste cooking oil-based biodiesel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Kang, DongHo & Auras, Rafael & Singh, Jay, 2017. "Life cycle assessment of non-alcoholic single-serve polyethylene terephthalate beverage bottles in the state of California," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 45-52.
    10. Allacker, K. & Mathieux, F. & Manfredi, S. & Pelletier, N. & De Camillis, C. & Ardente, F. & Pant, R., 2014. "Allocation solutions for secondary material production and end of life recovery: Proposals for product policy initiatives," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-12.
    11. Treyer, Karin & Bauer, Christian & Simons, Andrew, 2014. "Human health impacts in the life cycle of future European electricity generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(S1), pages 31-44.
    12. Briac Baudais & Hamid Ben Ahmed & Gurvan Jodin & Nicolas Degrenne & Stéphane Lefebvre, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of a 150 kW Electronic Power Inverter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Zhang, XiaoHong & Wei, Ye & Li, Min & Deng, ShiHuai & Wu, Jun & Zhang, YanZong & Xiao, Hong, 2014. "Emergy evaluation of an integrated livestock wastewater treatment system," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 95-107.
    14. Stotz, Philippe Maurice & Niero, Monia & Bey, Niki & Paraskevas, Dimos, 2017. "Environmental screening of novel technologies to increase material circularity: A case study on aluminium cans," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 96-106.
    15. Muhammad Hammad Mushtaq & Fahad Noor & M. A. Mujtaba & Salman Asghar & Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf & Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar & Abrar Hussain & Mohamed Fathy Badran & Kiran Shahapurkar, 2022. "Environmental Performance of Alternative Hospital Waste Management Strategies Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Mazen J. Al-Kheetan & Juliana Byzyka & Seyed Hamidreza Ghaffar, 2021. "Sustainable Valorisation of Silane-Treated Waste Glass Powder in Concrete Pavement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Toniolo, Sara & Mazzi, Anna & Niero, Monia & Zuliani, Filippo & Scipioni, Antonio, 2013. "Comparative LCA to evaluate how much recycling is environmentally favourable for food packaging," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 61-68.
    18. Chun-Youl Baek & Kiyotaka Tahara & Kyu-Hyun Park, 2018. "Parameter Uncertainty Analysis of the Life Cycle Inventory Database: Application to Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Brown Rice Production in IDEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Hunt, Emily J. & Zhang, Chenlong & Anzalone, Nick & Pearce, Joshua M., 2015. "Polymer recycling codes for distributed manufacturing with 3-D printers," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 24-30.
    20. Chih-Ming Chen & Huey-Ling Chang, 2022. "Environmental Impact Assessment of an Ignition Pencil Coil by a Combination of Carbon Footprint and Environmental Priority Strategies Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:69:y:2012:i:c:p:66-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.