IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v53y2009i7p400-408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A universal code for environmental management of products

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas, Valerie M.

Abstract

The UPC code has provided a foundation for efficient product supply chains, the proliferation of products, and the development of superstores. Extension of the universal product code could make reuse and recycling of consumer products more efficient, and provide a foundation for recycling more types of products. Three types of applications are discussed. Use of product codes in existing recycling and refurbishing enterprises (1) is a baseline application that may be cost-effective. Use of product codes for automated sorting of recyclables (2) is technically challenging, may be cost-effective as a follow-on application, and would provide potential for increased recycling of small appliances, small electronics, batteries, and other small goods. A universal product code also provides a basis for recycling innovations, such as recycling rebates and online market applications (3) that could increase reuse and recycling. Voluntary private sector implementation is feasible, with coordination between recyclers, manufacturers, retailers, government, and non-governmental organizations, although recycling regulation and legislation may be necessary for effective development of recycling programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas, Valerie M., 2009. "A universal code for environmental management of products," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 400-408.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2009:i:7:p:400-408
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344909000469
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holmes, Thomas J, 2001. "Bar Codes Lead to Frequent Deliveries and Superstores," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 32(4), pages 708-725, Winter.
    2. Markus Klausner & Wolfgang M. Grimm & Chris Hendrickson, 1998. "Reuse of Electric Motors in Consumer Products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 2(2), pages 89-102, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kissling, Ramon & Coughlan, Damian & Fitzpatrick, Colin & Boeni, Heinz & Luepschen, Claudia & Andrew, Stefan & Dickenson, John, 2013. "Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 21-31.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emek Basker, 2012. "Raising the Barcode Scanner: Technology and Productivity in the Retail Sector," NBER Chapters,in: Standards, Patents and Innovations National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Emek Basker, 2012. "Raising the Barcode Scanner: Technology and Productivity in the Retail Sector," NBER Chapters, in: Standards, Patents and Innovations, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Ali Hortaçsu & Chad Syverson, 2015. "The Ongoing Evolution of US Retail: A Format Tug-of-War," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(4), pages 89-112, Fall.
    4. Emek Basker & Timothy Simcoe, 2021. "Upstream, Downstream: Diffusion and Impacts of the Universal Product Code," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(4), pages 1252-1286.
    5. Raffaella Sadun, 2015. "Does Planning Regulation Protect Independent Retailers?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(5), pages 983-1001, December.
    6. Ammar Y. Alqahtani & Surendra M. Gupta, 2017. "One-Dimensional Renewable Warranty Management within Sustainable Supply Chain," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Gian-Claudia Sciara & Kristin Lovejoy & Susan Handy, 2018. "The Impacts of Big Box Retail on Downtown: A Case Study of Target in Davis (CA)," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(1), pages 45-60, January.
    8. Emin M. Dinlersoz, 2004. "Firm Organization and the Structure of Retail Markets," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 207-240, June.
    9. Parker, Jeffrey R. & Lehmann, Donald R., 2011. "When Shelf-Based Scarcity Impacts Consumer Preferences," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 142-155.
    10. Maican, Florin & Orth, Matilda, 2018. "Inventory Behavior, Demand, and Productivity in Retail," CEPR Discussion Papers 13308, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Nicholas Li, 2021. "Borders, varieties and distribution costs: Evidence from a US–Canada retail chain," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 949-985, November.
    12. Ihwan Ghazali & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid & Siti Zawiah Md Dawal & Irianto Irianto & Safarudin Gazali Herawan & Fu-Haw Ho & Rohana Abdullah & Amir Hamzah Abdul Rasib & Nur Wardah Sufina Padzil, 2023. "Embedding Green Product Attributes Preferences and Cultural Consideration for Product Design Development: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Jonathan Beck & Michal Grajek & Christian Wey, 2005. "Hypermarket Competition and the Diffusion of Retail Checkout Barcode Scanning," CIG Working Papers SP II 2005-19, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
    14. Jonathan Haskel & Raffaella Sadun, 2012. "Regulation and UK Retailing Productivity: Evidence from Microdata," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 79(315), pages 425-448, July.
    15. Meinen, Philipp & Raff, Horst, 2018. "International trade and retail market performance and structure: Theory and empirical evidence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 99-114.
    16. Emek Basker, 2015. "Change at the Checkout: Tracing the Impact of a Process Innovation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 339-370, June.
    17. Toktay, B. & van der Laan, E.A. & de Brito, M.P., 2003. "Managing Product Returns: The Role of Forecasting," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-023-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Maican, Florin & Orth, Matilda, 2021. "Determinants of economies of scope in retail," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Zuidwijk, Rob & Krikke, Harold, 2008. "Strategic response to EEE returns:: Product eco-design or new recovery processes?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 1206-1222, December.
    20. Maican, Florin & Orth, Matilda, 2021. "Entry Regulations and Product Variety in Retail," CEPR Discussion Papers 15992, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2009:i:7:p:400-408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.