IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v53y2008i1p45-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of factors influencing the performance of solid waste recycling programs

Author

Listed:
  • Suttibak, Samonporn
  • Nitivattananon, Vilas

Abstract

Municipal solid waste management (SWM) problems present a serious challenge to local government authorities (LGAs) in developing countries. The effective way to reduce this tremendous issue is to integreate waste recycling systems into existing and future SWM. Understanding factors influencing recycling performance is the key to achieving sustainable waste management. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors influencing the performance of SWM relating to solid waste recycling covering a total of 120 solid waste recycling programs located in different urban areas of Thailand. The indicators involving efficiency, effectiveness and service ratio were used for the assessment of recycling performance using statistical analysis methods. Influencing factors encompassing technical, economic and financial, and institutional aspects were identified for three types of recycling programs (school garbage bank, community garbage bank, and composting facility). The results suggest that common significant factors are perception of administrator awareness of SWM problems, and source separation. In terms of school garbage banks, the provision of monetary incentive including interest and compensatory goods for recycling members, transportation cost, and low investment costs significantly affect the performance. Provision of loans, managing the program as a cooperative organization, and provision of door-to-door service correlate with better performance by community garbage banks. For composting facilities, provision of free organic waste bins and cooperation with NGOs correlate with a higher rate of waste diversion. The findings also propose implications for enhancing the performance of recycling systems through a number of measures including provision of monetary incentive, tax incentives, subsidizations, information dissemination, awareness campaigns, training, technical assistance, staff exchanges, and networking with voluntary organizations—which should be formulated with respect to building capacity of development partners, responding to poor recycling performance, and focusing on significant influencing factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Suttibak, Samonporn & Nitivattananon, Vilas, 2008. "Assessment of factors influencing the performance of solid waste recycling programs," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 45-56.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2008:i:1:p:45-56
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.09.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344908001444
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.09.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, M. & Williams, I.D. & Clark, M., 2006. "Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 357-395.
    2. Timlett, R.E. & Williams, I.D., 2008. "Public participation and recycling performance in England: A comparison of tools for behaviour change," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 622-634.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ming-Hui Zhou & Shui-Long Shen & Ye-Shuang Xu & An-Nan Zhou, 2019. "New Policy and Implementation of Municipal Solid Waste Classification in Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Yalin Yuan & Mitsuyasu Yabe, 2014. "Residents’ Preferences for Household Kitchen Waste Source Separation Services in Beijing: A Choice Experiment Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Yangyang Zhang & Wenfang Huang, 2021. "Analysis on the Effectiveness of the Input in Household Waste Classification of Residents—Taking S City in China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Keramitsoglou, Kiriaki M. & Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P., 2013. "Public participation in designing a recycling scheme towards maximum public acceptance," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 55-67.
    5. Vásquez, Óscar C. & Álvarez, Adolfo & Silva, Julio & Muga, Alicia Pincheira, 2014. "Towards the estimation of demand for recycling in Chile: The case of Santiago," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 94-102.
    6. Ivis García, 2024. "Ease of Recycling in Glendale, Salt Lake City, Utah: Dissecting Recycling Efforts by Household Size, Age, Income and Gender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Antonius Priyo Nugroho Sulami & Takehiko Murayama & Shigeo Nishikizawa, 2023. "Promotion of Producer Contribution to Solve Packaging Waste Issues—Viewpoints of Waste Bank Members in the Bandung Area, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Ward, Miriam N. & Wells, Blake & Diyamandoglu, Vasil, 2014. "Development of a framework to implement a recycling program in an elementary school," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 138-146.
    9. López-Mosquera, Natalia & Lera-López, Fernando & Sánchez, Mercedes, 2015. "Key factors to explain recycling, car use and environmentally responsible purchase behaviors: A comparative perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 29-39.
    10. Anupama Singh & Papia Raj, 2019. "Sustainable recycling model for municipal solid waste in Patna," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(2), pages 212-234, March.
    11. Sekito, T. & Prayogo, T.B. & Dote, Y. & Yoshitake, T. & Bagus, I., 2013. "Influence of a community-based waste management system on people's behavior and waste reduction," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 84-90.
    12. Asim, Muhammad & Batool, Syeda Adila & Chaudhry, Muhammad Nawaz, 2012. "Scavengers and their role in the recycling of waste in Southwestern Lahore," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 152-162.
    13. Owusu, Victor & Adjei-Addo, Emmanuel & Sundberg, Cecilia, 2013. "Do economic incentives affect attitudes to solid waste source separation? Evidence from Ghana," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 115-123.
    14. Schoot Uiterkamp, Bob Jan & Azadi, Hossein & Ho, Peter, 2011. "Sustainable recycling model: A comparative analysis between India and Tanzania," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 344-355.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muise, Isaac & Adams, Michelle & Côté, Ray & Price, G.W., 2016. "Attitudes to the recovery and recycling of agricultural plastics waste: A case study of Nova Scotia, Canada," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 137-145.
    2. Dhokhikah, Yeny & Trihadiningrum, Yulinah & Sunaryo, Sony, 2015. "Community participation in household solid waste reduction in Surabaya, Indonesia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 153-162.
    3. Shira Daskal & Omar Asi & Isam Sabbah & Ofira Ayalon & Katie Baransi-Karkaby, 2022. "Decentralized Composting Analysis Model—Benefit/Cost Decision-Making Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Waite, Steve & Cox, Paul & Tudor, Terry, 2015. "Strategies for local authorities to achieve the EU 2020 50% recycling, reuse and composting target: A case study of England," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 18-28.
    5. Boonrod, K. & Towprayoon, S. & Bonnet, S. & Tripetchkul, S., 2015. "Enhancing organic waste separation at the source behavior: A case study of the application of motivation mechanisms in communities in Thailand," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 77-90.
    6. Bernstad, A. & la Cour Jansen, J. & Aspegren, A., 2013. "Door-stepping as a strategy for improved food waste recycling behaviour – Evaluation of a full-scale experiment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 94-103.
    7. Kaplowitz, Michael D. & Yeboah, Felix K. & Thorp, Laurie & Wilson, Aimee M., 2009. "Garnering input for recycling communication strategies at a Big Ten University," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(11), pages 612-623.
    8. Timlett, R.E. & Williams, I.D., 2009. "The impact of transient populations on recycling behaviour in a densely populated urban environment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 498-506.
    9. Kawther Saeedi, 2024. "Promoting Sustainable Household Engagement in Recycling via Blockchain-Based Loyalty Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Anna Kremel, 2024. "Consumer Behaviour in a Circular System – How Values Promote and Hinder the Participation of Young Adults in the Swedish Deposit-Refund System for Beverage Packaging," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1427-1446, June.
    11. Hancong Ma & Mei Li & Xin Tong & Ping Dong, 2023. "Community-Level Household Waste Disposal Behavior Simulation and Visualization under Multiple Incentive Policies—An Agent-Based Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Guang Han & Ping Zhai & Liqun Zhu & Kongqing Li, 2023. "Economic Incentives, Reputation Incentives, and Rural Residents’ Participation in Household Waste Classification: Evidence from Jiangsu, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Baihui Jin & Wei Li, 2023. "External Factors Impacting Residents’ Participation in Waste Sorting Using NCA and fsQCA Methods on Pilot Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Fontecha, John E. & Nikolaev, Alexander & Walteros, Jose L. & Zhu, Zhenduo, 2022. "Scientists wanted? A literature review on incentive programs that promote pro-environmental consumer behavior: Energy, waste, and water," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    15. Timlett, R.E. & Williams, I.D., 2008. "Public participation and recycling performance in England: A comparison of tools for behaviour change," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 622-634.
    16. Zhang, Suopeng & Zhang, Mingli & Yu, Xueying & Ren, Hao, 2016. "What keeps Chinese from recycling: Accessibility of recycling facilities and the behavior," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 176-186.
    17. Prestin, Abby & Pearce, Katy E., 2010. "We care a lot: Formative research for a social marketing campaign to promote school-based recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 1017-1026.
    18. Dorothea Christina Schoeman & Isaac Tebogo Rampedi, 2022. "Drivers of Household Recycling Behavior in the City of Johannesburg, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Sarah Cotterill & Liz Richardson, 2010. "Expanding the Use of Experiments on Civic Behavior: Experiments with Local Government as a Research Partner," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 628(1), pages 148-164, March.
    20. Li-San Hung & Chongming Wang, 2022. "Decision-making process related to climate change mitigation among married-couple households: A case study of Taiwan," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2008:i:1:p:45-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.