IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6268-d1117060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promotion of Producer Contribution to Solve Packaging Waste Issues—Viewpoints of Waste Bank Members in the Bandung Area, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Antonius Priyo Nugroho Sulami

    (Department of Trans-Disciplinary Science and Engineering, School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, G5-9 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama City 226-8502, Japan)

  • Takehiko Murayama

    (Department of Trans-Disciplinary Science and Engineering, School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, G5-9 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama City 226-8502, Japan)

  • Shigeo Nishikizawa

    (Department of Trans-Disciplinary Science and Engineering, School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, G5-9 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama City 226-8502, Japan)

Abstract

As regulations have developed, the waste management sector in Indonesia has increasingly expected producer involvement in waste reduction activity through the enactment of new regulations. In addition, the recent development of the waste management sector now involves community-based approaches such as waste banks. This study aims to determine the relationship between extended producer responsibility implementation and the waste bank concept. A questionnaire survey was designed and applied to waste bank members of two waste banks in the Bandung municipality, Indonesia. Several factors were identified that can be considered by producers to promote their contribution in dealing with the packaging waste issue, such as producer consideration and contribution, knowledge level, collection, and awareness of the importance of packaging waste issue. The result also shows that involving feedback from waste banks can provide some insights to expand and develop producer contribution in reducing the impact of packaging waste. Producers can improve collection and recyclability of their product packaging while increasing public knowledge on their activity at the post-consumer stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonius Priyo Nugroho Sulami & Takehiko Murayama & Shigeo Nishikizawa, 2023. "Promotion of Producer Contribution to Solve Packaging Waste Issues—Viewpoints of Waste Bank Members in the Bandung Area, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6268-:d:1117060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suttibak, Samonporn & Nitivattananon, Vilas, 2008. "Assessment of factors influencing the performance of solid waste recycling programs," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 45-56.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yangyang Zhang & Wenfang Huang, 2021. "Analysis on the Effectiveness of the Input in Household Waste Classification of Residents—Taking S City in China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Vásquez, Óscar C. & Álvarez, Adolfo & Silva, Julio & Muga, Alicia Pincheira, 2014. "Towards the estimation of demand for recycling in Chile: The case of Santiago," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 94-102.
    3. Sekito, T. & Prayogo, T.B. & Dote, Y. & Yoshitake, T. & Bagus, I., 2013. "Influence of a community-based waste management system on people's behavior and waste reduction," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 84-90.
    4. Schoot Uiterkamp, Bob Jan & Azadi, Hossein & Ho, Peter, 2011. "Sustainable recycling model: A comparative analysis between India and Tanzania," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 344-355.
    5. Asim, Muhammad & Batool, Syeda Adila & Chaudhry, Muhammad Nawaz, 2012. "Scavengers and their role in the recycling of waste in Southwestern Lahore," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 152-162.
    6. Ming-Hui Zhou & Shui-Long Shen & Ye-Shuang Xu & An-Nan Zhou, 2019. "New Policy and Implementation of Municipal Solid Waste Classification in Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-10, August.
    7. Keramitsoglou, Kiriaki M. & Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P., 2013. "Public participation in designing a recycling scheme towards maximum public acceptance," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 55-67.
    8. Ivis García, 2024. "Ease of Recycling in Glendale, Salt Lake City, Utah: Dissecting Recycling Efforts by Household Size, Age, Income and Gender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Ward, Miriam N. & Wells, Blake & Diyamandoglu, Vasil, 2014. "Development of a framework to implement a recycling program in an elementary school," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 138-146.
    10. Anupama Singh & Papia Raj, 2019. "Sustainable recycling model for municipal solid waste in Patna," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(2), pages 212-234, March.
    11. Yalin Yuan & Mitsuyasu Yabe, 2014. "Residents’ Preferences for Household Kitchen Waste Source Separation Services in Beijing: A Choice Experiment Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Owusu, Victor & Adjei-Addo, Emmanuel & Sundberg, Cecilia, 2013. "Do economic incentives affect attitudes to solid waste source separation? Evidence from Ghana," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 115-123.
    13. López-Mosquera, Natalia & Lera-López, Fernando & Sánchez, Mercedes, 2015. "Key factors to explain recycling, car use and environmentally responsible purchase behaviors: A comparative perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 29-39.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6268-:d:1117060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.