IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v109y2016icp13-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying environmental externalities with a view to internalizing them in the price of products, using different monetization models

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen, Thu Lan Thi
  • Laratte, Bertrand
  • Guillaume, Bertrand
  • Hua, Anthony

Abstract

In this paper, we first conduct an exhaustive literature review on how environmental externalities in a life cycle model could be valued and, through a case study, we check the consistency of the results obtained based on different monetization models. Then we compare the two approaches for internalization of externalities in the price of products: (1) to introduce a corrective tax equal to the externalities and (2) to apply reduced value added tax rates on environmentally friendly goods based on their relatively low externalities compared to less friendly alternatives. A typical product category is selected for the case study, i.e., electrical energy derived from the two distinct primary energy sources, renewable and non-renewable. The results comparing the three monetization methods illustrate that the choice of method used can influence not only the resulting monetary value of the externalities, or marginal social costs, of a single product but also the relative ranking among alternatives in the same product category. Our results also show that internalizing externalities by means of either a corrective tax (approach 1) or a reduced value added tax rate (approach 2) eliminates the price disadvantage of green products like electricity from biomass, making them a preferable choice over cheap conventional ones like coal.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen, Thu Lan Thi & Laratte, Bertrand & Guillaume, Bertrand & Hua, Anthony, 2016. "Quantifying environmental externalities with a view to internalizing them in the price of products, using different monetization models," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 13-23.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:109:y:2016:i:c:p:13-23
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916300180
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albrecht, Johan, 2006. "The use of consumption taxes to re-launch green tax reforms," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 88-103, March.
    2. Cornes,Richard & Sandler,Todd, 1996. "The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521477185, January.
    3. Nguyen, Thu Lan T. & Hermansen, John E. & Mogensen, Lisbeth, 2013. "Environmental performance of crop residues as an energy source for electricity production: The case of wheat straw in Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 633-641.
    4. Boris Krey & Philippe K. Widmer & Peter Zweifel, 2008. "Efficient provision of electricity for the United States and Switzerland," SOI - Working Papers 0812, Socioeconomic Institute - University of Zurich, revised Dec 2011.
    5. Goedecke, Martin & Therdthianwong, Supaporn & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2007. "Life cycle cost analysis of alternative vehicles and fuels in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 3236-3246, June.
    6. Owen, Anthony D., 2006. "Renewable energy: Externality costs as market barriers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 632-642, March.
    7. Horst Siebert, 2008. "Economics of the Environment," Springer Books, Springer, edition 7, number 978-3-540-73707-0, April.
    8. Weidema, Bo Pedersen, 2009. "Using the budget constraint to monetarise impact assessment results," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1591-1598, April.
    9. Micha? Soliwoda & Joanna Paw?owska-Tyszko, 2015. "Tax policy tools vs. sustainable development of agriculture. The case of Poland," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2604481, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    10. 宮本, 憲一 & Miyamoto, Kenichi & 作間, 逸雄 & Sakuma, Itsuo & 小出, 秀雄 & Koide, Hideo & 林, 公則 & 阿部, 新 & Abe, Arata, 2005. "環境経済論の最近の展開 2005, Recent developments in environmental economics," Discussion Paper Series b32, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    11. ., 2005. "Economics and the living environment," Chapters, in: Economics of Environmental Conservation, Second Edition, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Dong & Cruz, Jose M., 2022. "Multiperiod supply chain network dynamics under investment in sustainability, externality cost, and consumers’ willingness to pay," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Zhen, Huayang & Qiao, Yuhui & Zhao, Haijun & Ju, Xuehai & Zanoli, Raffaele & Waqas, Muhammad Ahmed & Lun, Fei & Knudsen, Marie Trydeman, 2022. "Developing a conceptual model to quantify eco-compensation based on environmental and economic cost-benefit analysis for promoting the ecologically intensified agriculture," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Zhen, Huayang & Gao, Wenzeng & Yuan, Kai & Ju, Xuehai & Qiao, Yuhui, 2021. "Internalizing externalities through net ecosystem service analysis–A case study of greenhouse vegetable farms in Beijing," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    4. Mingyue Wang & Yingming Li & Zitong Wang & Junqiang Li, 2022. "The Heterogeneous Relationship between Pollution Charges and Enterprise Green Technology Innovation, Based on the Data of Chinese Industrial Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Niccolò Caramanico & Giuseppe Di Florio & Maria Camilla Baratto & Viviana Cigolotti & Riccardo Basosi & Elena Busi, 2021. "Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Household Energy Systems Including Incentives on Energy Communities and Externalities: A Case Study in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Daniel Friedrich, 2022. "How environmental goals influence consumer willingness-to-pay for a plastic tax: a discrete-choice analytical study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8218-8245, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bell, David R. & Silalertruksa, Thapat & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Kamens, Richard, 2011. "The net cost of biofuels in Thailand--An economic analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 834-843, February.
    2. Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak & Kazimierz Warmiński, 2020. "Willow Cultivation as Feedstock for Bioenergy-External Production Cost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Sovit Parajuli & Bishal Mahatara & Srijan Budhathoki & Manoj Paudel & Kiran Parajuli & Aavash Adhikari, 2021. "Scenario Of Pesticide Import, Formulation, Consumption And The Residue Status Among Agricultural Crops In Nepal," Big Data In Agriculture (BDA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 94-99, July.
    4. Zhen, Huayang & Gao, Wenzeng & Yuan, Kai & Ju, Xuehai & Qiao, Yuhui, 2021. "Internalizing externalities through net ecosystem service analysis–A case study of greenhouse vegetable farms in Beijing," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    5. Johan Eyckmans & Michael Finus, 2006. "New roads to international environmental agreements: the case of global warming," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 7(4), pages 391-414, December.
    6. Ingrid Ott & Stephen J. Turnovsky, 2006. "Excludable and Non‐excludable Public Inputs: Consequences for Economic Growth," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 73(292), pages 725-748, November.
    7. Andrew B. Whitford & Derrick Anderson, 2021. "Governance landscapes for emerging technologies: The case of cryptocurrencies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1053-1070, October.
    8. Anni Orola & Anna Härri & Jarkko Levänen & Ville Uusitalo & Stig Irving Olsen, 2022. "Assessing WELBY Social Life Cycle Assessment Approach through Cobalt Mining Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    9. Acocella Nicola & Di Bartolomeo Giovanni, 2013. "Population location, commuting and local public goods: A political economy approach," wp.comunite 0105, Department of Communication, University of Teramo.
    10. Kverndokk, Snorre & Figenbaum, Erik & Hovi, Jon, 2020. "Would my driving pattern change if my neighbor were to buy an emission-free car?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Cornes Richard & Sandler Todd, 2000. "Pareto-Improving Redistribution and Pure Public Goods," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 169-186, May.
    12. David Kelsey & Frank Milne, 2006. "Externalities, monopoly and the objective function of the firm," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 29(3), pages 565-589, November.
    13. Matteo Migheli & Giovanni B. Ramello, 2014. "Open Access Journals & Academics’ Behaviour," ICER Working Papers 03-2014, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    14. Wiktor Adamowicz & Mark Dickie & Shelby Gerking & Marcella Veronesi & David Zinner, 2014. "Household Decision Making and Valuation of Environmental Health Risks to Parents and Their Children," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(4), pages 481-519.
    15. John B. Loomis, 2013. "Incorporating distributional issues into benefit–cost analysis: why, how, and two empirical examples using non-market valuation," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 9, pages 294-316, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Wolfgang Buchholz & Wolfgang Peters, 2007. "Justifying the Lindahl solution as an outcome of fair cooperation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 157-169, October.
    17. Clemens Heuson & Wolfgang Peters & Reimund Schwarze & Anna-Katharina Topp, 2015. "Voluntary International Climate Finance Under The Post-Kyoto Framework: The Strategic Consequences Of Different Modes Of Funding," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 1-26.
    18. Islam, Aminul & Chan, Eng-Seng & Taufiq-Yap, Yun Hin & Mondal, Md. Alam Hossain & Moniruzzaman, M. & Mridha, Moniruzzaman, 2014. "Energy security in Bangladesh perspective—An assessment and implication," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 154-171.
    19. Mr. Kenneth Rogoff & Yuanchen Yang, 2022. "A Tale of Tier 3 Cities," IMF Working Papers 2022/196, International Monetary Fund.
    20. Hikaru Ogawa, 2010. "Fiscal Competition among Regional Governments - Tax Competition, Expenditure Competition and Externalities -," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-30, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:109:y:2016:i:c:p:13-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.