IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v103y2015icp171-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agent-based life cycle assessment for switchgrass-based bioenergy systems

Author

Listed:
  • Bichraoui-Draper, Najet
  • Xu, Ming
  • Miller, Shelie A.
  • Guillaume, Bertrand

Abstract

Switchgrass is a biomass crop with no established market. Its adoption will involve a wide range of socio-economic factors, making it a particularly difficult system to analyze for environmental impact estimates. Life cycle assessment (LCA) provides a methodology to quantify the environmental impacts of a product or process throughout its entire supply chain. However, traditional LCA approaches fail to account for the local variability in non-homogeneous systems. Because of the time component and other realm dynamics it is essential to visualize as the switchgrass adoption process as a Complex Adaptive System (CAS). Agent-based modeling (ABM) can be used to supplement life cycle information to account for these dynamics variances. Here, we present an Agent-Based Life Cycle Analysis (AB-LCA) model of farmers’ potential adoption of switchgrass as a biomass. The chosen modeling approach aims to understand the main factors influencing landowner decision-making and how these adoption patterns can affect the LCA of switchgrass ethanol. To help address these challenges, we developed an Agent-Based Model aimed at: (1) understanding the main factors influencing landowner decision-making and how these adoption patterns can affect the LCA of switchgrass ethanol and (2) improving the LCA modeling methodology by overcoming the issues involved with analyzing emerging technologies with dynamic and evolving supply chains. Particularly, we built an agent-based model using LCA data of switchgrass-based ethanol production that simultaneously captures socioeconomic factors, such as age, level of risk aversion, education level, and level of profit, of farmers that lead to switchgrass adoption and the changes in environmental impact that result from this particular behavior. The results show that the most influential factors affecting farmers’ decisions are their current economic situation and crop prices. Age and their level of knowledge of the new crop have some impact but with limited extent.

Suggested Citation

  • Bichraoui-Draper, Najet & Xu, Ming & Miller, Shelie A. & Guillaume, Bertrand, 2015. "Agent-based life cycle assessment for switchgrass-based bioenergy systems," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 171-178.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:103:y:2015:i:c:p:171-178
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134491530063X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Davis & Igor Nikolić & Gerard P. J. Dijkema, 2009. "Integration of Life Cycle Assessment Into Agent‐Based Modeling," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(2), pages 306-325, April.
    2. Axelrod, Robert, 2006. "Agent-based Modeling as a Bridge Between Disciplines," Handbook of Computational Economics, in: Leigh Tesfatsion & Kenneth L. Judd (ed.), Handbook of Computational Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 33, pages 1565-1584, Elsevier.
    3. Happe, Kathrin, 2005. "Agent-Based Modelling and Sensitivity Analysis by Experimental Design and Metamodelling: An Application to Modelling Regional Structural Change," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24464, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Elmar Kiesling & Markus Günther & Christian Stummer & Lea Wakolbinger, 2012. "Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(2), pages 183-230, June.
    5. Martin Hohnisch & Sabine Pittnauer & Dietrich Stauffer, 2008. "A percolation-based model explaining delayed takeoff in new-product diffusion," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 17(5), pages 1001-1017, October.
    6. Faber, Albert & Valente, Marco & Janssen, Peter, 2010. "Exploring domestic micro-cogeneration in the Netherlands: An agent-based demand model for technology diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 2763-2775, June.
    7. Shelie A. Miller & Stephen Moysey & Benjamin Sharp & Jose Alfaro, 2013. "A Stochastic Approach to Model Dynamic Systems in Life Cycle Assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(3), pages 352-362, June.
    8. Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & Hendricks, Chad, 2003. "Off-Farm Work And The Economic Impact Of Adopting Herbicide-Tolerant Crops," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22130, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Jager, W. & Janssen, M. A. & De Vries, H. J. M. & De Greef, J. & Vlek, C. A. J., 2000. "Behaviour in commons dilemmas: Homo economicus and Homo psychologicus in an ecological-economic model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 357-379, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Bin & Ding, Li & Xu, Huanfei & Mu, Xindong & Wang, Haisong, 2017. "Multivariate data analysis applied in alkali-based pretreatment of corn stover," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 307-318.
    2. Burli, Pralhad H. & Nguyen, Ruby T. & Hartley, Damon S. & Griffel, L. Michael & Vazhnik, Veronika & Lin, Yingqian, 2021. "Farmer characteristics and decision-making: A model for bioenergy crop adoption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Vance, C. & Sweeney, J. & Murphy, F., 2022. "Space, time, and sustainability: The status and future of life cycle assessment frameworks for novel biorefinery systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2023. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359527, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. Thomas Beaussier & Sylvain Caurla & Véronique Bellon Maurel & Eléonore Loiseau, 2019. "Coupling economic models and environmental assessment methods to support regional policies : A critical review," Post-Print hal-02021423, HAL.
    6. Sojung Kim & Yeona Choi & Sumin Kim, 2023. "Simulation Modeling in Supply Chain Management Research of Ethanol: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-13, November.
    7. Jianling Fan & Cuiying Liu & Jianan Xie & Lu Han & Chuanhong Zhang & Dengwei Guo & Junzhao Niu & Hao Jin & Brian G. McConkey, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment on Agricultural Production: A Mini Review on Methodology, Application, and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Nugroho, Yohanes Kristianto & Zhu, Liandong & Heavey, Cathal, 2022. "Building an agent-based techno-economic assessment coupled with life cycle assessment of biomass to methanol supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    9. Yang, Pan & Cai, Ximing & Hu, Xinchen & Zhao, Qiankun & Lee, Yuanyao & Khanna, Madhu & Cortés-Peña, Yoel R. & Guest, Jeremy S. & Kent, Jeffrey & Hudiburg, Tara W. & Du, Erhu & John, Steve & Iutzi, Fre, 2022. "An agent-based modeling tool supporting bioenergy and bio-product community communication regarding cellulosic bioeconomy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2022. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/352782, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paola D’Orazio & Marco Valente, 2018. "Do Financial Constraints Hamper Environmental Innovation Diffusion? An Agent-Based Approach," SPRU Working Paper Series 2018-10, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    2. Elmar Kiesling & Markus Günther & Christian Stummer & Lea Wakolbinger, 2012. "Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(2), pages 183-230, June.
    3. Balint, T. & Lamperti, F. & Mandel, A. & Napoletano, M. & Roventini, A. & Sapio, A., 2017. "Complexity and the Economics of Climate Change: A Survey and a Look Forward," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 252-265.
    4. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1nlv566svi86iqtetenms15tc4 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Cantono, Simona, 2012. "Unveiling diffusion dynamics: an autocatalytic percolation model of environmental innovation diffusion and the optimal dynamic path of adoption subsidies," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201222, University of Turin.
    6. Palmer, J. & Sorda, G. & Madlener, R., 2015. "Modeling the diffusion of residential photovoltaic systems in Italy: An agent-based simulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 106-131.
    7. Niamir, Leila & Filatova, Tatiana & Voinov, Alexey & Bressers, Hans, 2018. "Transition to low-carbon economy: Assessing cumulative impacts of individual behavioral changes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 325-345.
    8. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5qr7f0k4sk8rbq4do5u6v70rm0 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/1nlv566svi86iqtetenms15tc4 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5qr7f0k4sk8rbq4do5u6v70rm0 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Wolf, Ingo & Schröder, Tobias & Neumann, Jochen & de Haan, Gerhard, 2015. "Changing minds about electric cars: An empirically grounded agent-based modeling approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 269-285.
    12. Pearce, Phoebe & Slade, Raphael, 2018. "Feed-in tariffs for solar microgeneration: Policy evaluation and capacity projections using a realistic agent-based model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 95-111.
    13. Katarzyna Maciejowska & Arkadiusz Jedrzejewski & Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Rafal Weron, 2015. "Two faces of word-of-mouth: Understanding the impact of social interactions on demand curves for innovative products," HSC Research Reports HSC/15/09, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Technology.
    14. Papazian, Hermine & Bousquet, François & Antona, Martine & d'Aquino, Patrick, 2017. "A Stakeholder-oriented Framework to Consider the Plurality of Land Policy Integration in Sahel," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 155-168.
    15. Sorda, G. & Sunak, Y. & Madlener, R., 2013. "An agent-based spatial simulation to evaluate the promotion of electricity from agricultural biogas plants in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 43-60.
    16. Meihan He & Jongsu Lee, 2020. "Social culture and innovation diffusion: a theoretically founded agent-based model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1109-1149, September.
    17. Shi, Yingying & Zeng, Yongchao & Engo, Jean & Han, Botang & Li, Yang & Muehleisen, Ralph T., 2020. "Leveraging inter-firm influence in the diffusion of energy efficiency technologies: An agent-based model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    18. Schlüter, Maja & Baeza, Andres & Dressler, Gunnar & Frank, Karin & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Jager, Wander & Janssen, Marco A. & McAllister, Ryan R.J. & Müller, Birgit & Orach, Kirill & Schwarz, Nina & Wij, 2017. "A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 21-35.
    19. Geovanna Hinojoza-Castro & Montserrat Gómez-Delgado & Wenseslao Plata-Rocha, 2022. "Real Estate Developers as Agents in the Simulation of Urban Sprawl," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-12, July.
    20. Régis Chenavaz & Corina Paraschiv & Gabriel Turinici, 2017. "Dynamic Pricing of New Products in Competitive Markets: A Mean-Field Game Approach," Working Papers hal-01592958, HAL.
    21. Jakob Grazzini & Matteo G. Richiardi & Lisa Sella, 2013. "Analysis of Agent-based Models," LABORatorio R. Revelli Working Papers Series 135, LABORatorio R. Revelli, Centre for Employment Studies.
    22. Zhang, Tianyu & Dong, Peiwu & Zeng, Yongchao & Ju, Yanbing, 2022. "Analyzing the diffusion of competitive smart wearable devices: An agent-based multi-dimensional relative agreement model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 90-105.
    23. D’Orazio, Paola & Valente, Marco, 2019. "The role of finance in environmental innovation diffusion: An evolutionary modeling approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 417-439.
    24. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2023. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359527, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:103:y:2015:i:c:p:171-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.