IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v38y1995i2-3p199-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An instrument for quality performance measurement

Author

Listed:
  • De Toni, A.
  • Nassimbeni, G.
  • Tonchia, S.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • De Toni, A. & Nassimbeni, G. & Tonchia, S., 1995. "An instrument for quality performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2-3), pages 199-207, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:38:y:1995:i:2-3:p:199-207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0925-5273(94)00093-P
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Porter, Leslie J. & Rayner, Paul, 1992. "Quality costing for total quality management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 69-81, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. Lo, Edmond & Pushpakumara, Chamli, 1999. "Performance and partnership in global manufacturing-modelling frameworks and techniques," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 261-269, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Šepetienė Ramunė & Čiubrinskienė Rasa & Ruževičius Juozas, 2017. "Systemic Improvement of Management: Case Analysis of a Company Evaluating Quality Costs," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 77(1), pages 153-167, June.
    2. Quigley, John & Walls, Lesley & Demirel, Güven & MacCarthy, Bart L. & Parsa, Mahdi, 2018. "Supplier quality improvement: The value of information under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 932-947.
    3. Barad, Miryam, 1995. "Some cultural/geographical styles in quality strategies and quality costs (P.R. China versus Australia)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-3), pages 81-92, October.
    4. Anna Nagurney & Dong Li, 2014. "A Dynamic Network Oligopoly Model with Transportation Costs, Product Differentiation, and Quality Competition," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 44(2), pages 201-229, August.
    5. Hazen, Benjamin T. & Weigel, Fred K. & Ezell, Jeremy D. & Boehmke, Bradley C. & Bradley, Randy V., 2017. "Toward understanding outcomes associated with data quality improvement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 737-747.
    6. Raymond Aoieong & S. L. Tang & Syed Ahmed, 2002. "A process approach in measuring quality costs of construction projects: model development," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 179-192.
    7. Hazen, Benjamin T. & Boone, Christopher A. & Ezell, Jeremy D. & Jones-Farmer, L. Allison, 2014. "Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 72-80.
    8. PrzemysEaw Niewiadomski & Bogdan Nogalski, 2021. "Quality costs in the companyb," Zeszyty Naukowe Małopolskiej Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Tarnowie / The Malopolska School of Economics in Tarnow Research Papers Collection, Malopolska School of Economics in Tarnow, vol. 51(3), pages 87-105, September.
    9. Noci, Giuliano & Toletti, Giovanni, 2000. "Selecting quality-based programmes in small firms: A comparison between the fuzzy linguistic approach and the analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 113-133, September.
    10. Li, Dong & Nagurney, Anna, 2015. "A general multitiered supply chain network model of quality competition with suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 336-356.
    11. Krystel K. Castillo-Villar & Hertwin Minor-Popocatl & Erin Webb, 2016. "Quantifying the Impact of Feedstock Quality on the Design of Bioenergy Supply Chain Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:38:y:1995:i:2-3:p:199-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.