IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v262y2023ics0925527323001366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MIP-based heuristics for combinatorial design of reconfigurable rotary transfer machines for production of multiple parts

Author

Listed:
  • Battaïa, Olga
  • Dolgui, Alexandre
  • Guschinsky, Nikolai

Abstract

This paper deals with a problem of the optimal configuration of a rotary transfer machine with turrets for machining multiple parts. This is a hard combinatorial optimization problem appearing at the preliminary machine design stage. Such machines are multi-positional, i.e. parts are sequentially machined on several working positions. At each working position, several machining modules (spindle heads) can be installed to process the tasks assigned to this position. Machining modules are activated sequentially or simultaneously. Sequential activation is realized by the use of turrets. Simultaneous activation is possible if machining modules are related to the different sides of the part, and if they can work in parallel. There are horizontal and vertical spindle heads, and turrets to access different sides of the parts on a working position. At the preliminary design stage, the following decisions must be made: the choice of orientations of the parts on the rotary table; the partitioning of the given set of tasks into positions and their assignment to machining modules (selection or design of machining modules to use), and the choice of cutting modes for each spindle head and turret. The objective is to minimize the total cost of equipment used. The number of possible solutions for this combinatorial design problem increases exponentially with the number of part types to be produced, and this represents a computational burden for decision-makers (usually process engineers). In this paper, in order to help decision makers deal efficiently with the manufacturing of multiple batches of parts, we develop a powerful heuristic framework which can be used in real life industrial cases. We test the developed methodology on the real-life cases provided by one of our industrial partners and demonstrate its efficiency. The proposed model and algorithms allow to minimize the cost of designed machines.

Suggested Citation

  • Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre & Guschinsky, Nikolai, 2023. "MIP-based heuristics for combinatorial design of reconfigurable rotary transfer machines for production of multiple parts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:262:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323001366
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527323001366
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho, William & Ji, Ping, 2010. "Integrated component scheduling models for chip shooter machines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 31-41, January.
    2. Olga Battaïa & Alexandre Dolgui & Nikolai Guschinsky, 2017. "Decision support for design of reconfigurable rotary machining systems for family part production," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 1368-1385, March.
    3. Amro M. Farid, 2017. "Measures of reconfigurability and its key characteristics in intelligent manufacturing systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 353-369, February.
    4. Ortega-Jimenez, Cesar H. & Garrido-Vega, Pedro & Cruz Torres, Cristian Andrés, 2020. "Achieving plant responsiveness from reconfigurable technology: Intervening role of SCM," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 195-203.
    5. Amirhossein Khezri & Hichem Haddou Benderbal & Lyes Benyoucef, 2021. "Towards a sustainable reconfigurable manufacturing system (SRMS): multi-objective based approaches for process plan generation problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(15), pages 4533-4558, August.
    6. Jianping Dou & Jun Li & Dan Xia & Xia Zhao, 2021. "A multi-objective particle swarm optimisation for integrated configuration design and scheduling in reconfigurable manufacturing system," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(13), pages 3975-3995, July.
    7. Yoram Koren & Wencai Wang & Xi Gu, 2017. "Value creation through design for scalability of reconfigurable manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 1227-1242, March.
    8. Dolgui, Alexandre & Hashemi-Petroodi, S. Ehsan & Kovalev, Sergey & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2021. "Profitability of a multi-model manufacturing line versus multiple dedicated lines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    9. Dolgui, Alexandre & Kovalev, Sergey & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y. & Nossack, Jenny & Pesch, Erwin, 2014. "Minimizing setup costs in a transfer line design problem with sequential operation processing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 186-194.
    10. Guschinskaya, O. & Dolgui, A. & Guschinsky, N. & Levin, G., 2008. "A heuristic multi-start decomposition approach for optimal design of serial machining lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 902-913, September.
    11. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Scholl, Armin, 2008. "Assembly line balancing: Which model to use when," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 509-528, February.
    12. Prince Pal Singh & Jatinder Madan & Harwinder Singh, 2021. "Composite performance metric for product flow configuration selection of reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS)," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(13), pages 3996-4016, July.
    13. Abdi, M.R., 2009. "Fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for evaluating reconfigurable machines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2013. "A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solutionapproaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 259-277.
    15. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    16. Sun, Dong-Seok & Lee, Tae-Eog & Kim, Kyung-Hoon, 2005. "Component allocation and feeder arrangement for a dual-gantry multi-head surface mounting placement tool," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 245-264, February.
    17. Olga Battaïa & Alexandre Dolgui & Nikolai Guschinsky, 2020. "Optimal cost design of flow lines with reconfigurable machines for batch production," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(10), pages 2937-2952, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    2. Mao, Zhaofang & Sun, Yiting & Fang, Kan & Huang, Dian & Zhang, Jiaxin, 2024. "Balancing and scheduling of assembly line with multi-type collaborative robots," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    3. García-Villoria, Alberto & Corominas, Albert & Nadal, Adrià & Pastor, Rafael, 2018. "Solving the accessibility windows assembly line problem level 1 and variant 1 (AWALBP-L1-1) with precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 882-895.
    4. Borba, Leonardo & Ritt, Marcus & Miralles, Cristóbal, 2018. "Exact and heuristic methods for solving the Robotic Assembly Line Balancing Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 146-156.
    5. Chica, Manuel & Bautista, Joaquín & Cordón, Óscar & Damas, Sergio, 2016. "A multiobjective model and evolutionary algorithms for robust time and space assembly line balancing under uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 55-68.
    6. Dolgui, Alexandre & Hashemi-Petroodi, S. Ehsan & Kovalev, Sergey & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2021. "Profitability of a multi-model manufacturing line versus multiple dedicated lines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Sikora, Celso Gustavo Stall, 2024. "Balancing mixed-model assembly lines for random sequences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 597-611.
    8. Weckenborg, Christian & Schumacher, Patrick & Thies, Christian & Spengler, Thomas S., 2024. "Flexibility in manufacturing system design: A review of recent approaches from Operations Research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 413-441.
    9. Arnd Huchzermeier & Tobias Mönch, 2023. "Mixed‐model assembly lines with variable takt and open stations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 704-722, March.
    10. Liang, Wei & Zhang, Zeqiang & Yin, Tao & Zhang, Yu & Wu, Tengfei, 2023. "Modelling and optimisation of energy consumption and profit-oriented multi-parallel partial disassembly line balancing problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    11. Zhexuan Zhou & Yajie Dou & Jianbin Sun & Jiang Jiang & Yuejin Tan, 2017. "Sustainable Production Line Evaluation Based on Evidential Reasoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Hashemi-Petroodi, S. Ehsan & Thevenin, Simon & Kovalev, Sergey & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2023. "Markov decision process for multi-manned mixed-model assembly lines with walking workers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    13. Sternatz, Johannes, 2015. "The joint line balancing and material supply problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 304-318.
    14. Bashir Salah & Mustufa Haider Abidi & Syed Hammad Mian & Mohammed Krid & Hisham Alkhalefah & Ali Abdo, 2019. "Virtual Reality-Based Engineering Education to Enhance Manufacturing Sustainability in Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Parames Chutima, 2022. "A comprehensive review of robotic assembly line balancing problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-34, January.
    16. Youssef Lahrichi & Laurent Deroussi & Nathalie Grangeon & Sylvie Norre, 2021. "A balance-first sequence-last algorithm to design RMS: a matheuristic with performance guaranty to balance reconfigurable manufacturing systems," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 107-132, April.
    17. Tiacci, Lorenzo & Mimmi, Mario, 2018. "Integrating ergonomic risks evaluation through OCRA index and balancing/sequencing decisions for mixed model stochastic asynchronous assembly lines," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 112-138.
    18. He, Junkai & Chu, Feng & Dolgui, Alexandre & Anjos, Miguel F., 2024. "Multi-objective disassembly line balancing and related supply chain management problems under uncertainty: Review and future trends," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    19. Jihee Han & Yoonho Seo, 2017. "Mechanism to minimise the assembly time with feeder assignment for a multi-headed gantry and high-speed SMT machine," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(10), pages 2930-2949, May.
    20. Lopes, Thiago Cantos & Pastre, Giuliano Vidal & Michels, Adalberto Sato & Magatão, Leandro, 2020. "Flexible multi-manned assembly line balancing problem: Model, heuristic procedure, and lower bounds for line length minimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:262:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323001366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.