IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v143y2013i2p242-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking manufacturing flexibility to innovation performance in manufacturing plants

Author

Listed:
  • Oke, Adegoke

Abstract

In the past few decades, the concept of manufacturing flexibility has become a key competitive criterion for many manufacturing organizations. The importance of flexibility in supporting other competitive criteria such as cost, quality and delivery speed has also been recognized (Bolwijn and Kumpe, 1990). However, there is a dearth of studies linking flexibility with another competitive criterion—innovation. In this study, we investigate the influence of the interaction of mix flexibility and labor flexibility on product innovation based on a survey of UK manufacturing plants. Further, we investigate the role of climate for innovation both as an antecedent of product innovation and a moderator that moderates the influence of the interaction of mix flexibility and labor flexibility on product innovation. The analyses reveal that the interaction of mix flexibility and labor flexibility positively predicts product innovation in manufacturing plants. Climate for innovation positively predicts product innovation and also positively moderates the interaction of mix and labor flexibility on product innovation. The implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Oke, Adegoke, 2013. "Linking manufacturing flexibility to innovation performance in manufacturing plants," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 242-247.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:143:y:2013:i:2:p:242-247
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527311004002
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cordero, Rene, 1990. "The measurement of innovation performance in the firm: An overview," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 185-192, April.
    2. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Arnoud De Meyer & Jinichiro Nakane & Jeffrey G. Miller & Kasra Ferdows, 1989. "Flexibility: The next competitive battle the manufacturing futures survey," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 135-144, March.
    4. Fernando F. Suarez & Michael A. Cusumano & Charles H. Fine, 1996. "An Empirical Study of Manufacturing Flexibility in Printed Circuit Board Assembly," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 223-240, February.
    5. Jeffrey G. Miller & Aleda V. Roth, 1994. "A Taxonomy of Manufacturing Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 285-304, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Candi, Marina & Beltagui, Ahmad, 2019. "Effective use of 3D printing in the innovation process," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 63-73.
    2. Magaly Gaviria-Marin & Jorge Matute-Vallejo & Hugo Baier-Fuentes, 2021. "The effect of ICT and higher-order capabilities on the performance of Ibero-American SMEs," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 414-450, December.
    3. Pravin Kumar & Rajesh K. Singh & Rakesh Kumar, 2017. "An integrated framework of interpretive structural modeling and graph theory matrix approach to fix the agility index of an automobile manufacturing organization," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(1), pages 342-352, January.
    4. Jain, Vineet & Raj, Tilak, 2016. "Modeling and analysis of FMS performance variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 84-96.
    5. Zhi-Peng Li & Hyi-Thaek Ceong & Sang-Joon Lee, 2021. "The Effect of Blockchain Operation Capabilities on Competitive Performance in Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Lalatendu Kesari Jena & Nazia Zabin Memon, 2018. "Does Workplace Flexibility Usher Innovation? A Moderated Mediation Model on the Enablers of Innovative Workplace Behavior," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(1), pages 5-17, March.
    7. Graziela Darla Araujo Galvão & Steve Evans & Paulo Sergio Scoleze Ferrer & Marly Monteiro de Carvalho, 2022. "Circular business model: Breaking down barriers towards sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1504-1524, May.
    8. Liu, Yi & Liao, Yonghai & Li, Yuan, 2018. "Capability configuration, ambidexterity and performance: Evidence from service outsourcing sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 343-352.
    9. Huo, Baofeng & Ye, Yuxiao & Zhao, Xiande & Shou, Yongyi, 2016. "The impact of human capital on supply chain integration and competitive performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 132-143.
    10. Federica Costa & Alberto Portioli-Staudacher, 2021. "Labor flexibility integration in workload control in Industry 4.0 era," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 420-433, December.
    11. Choe, Pilsung & Tew, Jeffrey D. & Tong, Songzhen, 2015. "Effect of cognitive automation in a material handling system on manufacturing flexibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PC), pages 891-899.
    12. Seebacher, Gottfried & Winkler, Herwig, 2015. "A capability approach to evaluate supply chain flexibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 177-186.
    13. Nagwan AlQershi & Zakaria Bin Abas & Sany Sanuri Mohd Mokhtar, 2019. "THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF HUMAN CAPITAL ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STRATEGIC INNOVATION AND THE PERFORMANCE OF MANUFACTURING SMEs IN YEMEN," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 10(1).
    14. Cherrafi, Anass & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Kumar, Vikas & Mishra, Nishikant & Ghobadian, Abby & Elfezazi, Said, 2018. "Lean, green practices and process innovation: A model for green supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 79-92.
    15. Yu, Kangkang & Cadeaux, Jack & Luo, Ben Nanfeng, 2015. "Operational flexibility: Review and meta-analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 190-202.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Hajmohammad & Stephan Vachon, 2014. "Safety Culture: A Catalyst for Sustainable Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 263-281, August.
    2. Dai, Jing & Montabon, Frank L. & Cantor, David E., 2014. "Linking rival and stakeholder pressure to green supply management: Mediating role of top management support," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 173-187.
    3. Donna Marshall & Lucy McCarthy & Marius Claudy & Paul McGrath, 2019. "Piggy in the Middle: How Direct Customer Power Affects First-Tier Suppliers’ Adoption of Socially Responsible Procurement Practices and Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1081-1102, February.
    4. Chang, Shih-Chia & Yang, Chen-Lung & Cheng, Hsin-Chia & Sheu, Chwen, 2003. "Manufacturing flexibility and business strategy: An empirical study of small and medium sized firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 13-26, January.
    5. Tachizawa, Elcio M. & Gimenez, Cristina, 2010. "Supply flexibility strategies in Spanish firms: Results from a survey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 214-224, March.
    6. Cho, Young Sik & Linderman, Kevin, 2019. "Metacognition-based process improvement practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 132-144.
    7. Curkovic, Sime, 2003. "Environmentally Responsible Manufacturing: The development and validation of a measurement model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 130-155, April.
    8. Larry J. Menor & M. Murat Kristal & Eve D. Rosenzweig, 2007. "Examining the Influence of Operational Intellectual Capital on Capabilities and Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 559-578, May.
    9. Dai, Jing & Montabon, Frank L. & Cantor, David E., 2015. "Reprint of “Linking rival and stakeholder pressure to green supply management: Mediating role of top management support”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 124-138.
    10. Lee, Peter K.C. & Humphreys, Paul K., 2007. "The role of Guanxi in supply management practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 450-467, April.
    11. Linder, Christian, 2019. "Customer orientation and operations: The role of manufacturing capabilities in small- and medium-sized enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 105-117.
    12. Somen Dey & R. R. K. Sharma & Balbir Kumar Pandey, 2019. "Relationship of Manufacturing Flexibility with Organizational Strategy," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(3), pages 237-256, September.
    13. Thomas V. Scannell & Kenneth J. Peterson & Sime Curkovic, 2013. "The Value Contribution of Manufacturing Technology Suppliers," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(2), pages 39-49, October.
    14. Cai, Shaohan & Yang, Zhilin, 2014. "On the relationship between business environment and competitive priorities: The role of performance frontiers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 131-145.
    15. Singh, Nitya P. & Hong, Paul C., 2020. "Impact of strategic and operational risk management practices on firm performance: An empirical investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 723-735.
    16. Rodriguez, Nuria Garcia & Perez, M Jose Sanzo & Gutierrez, Juan A. Trespalacios, 2008. "Can a good organizational climate compensate for a lack of top management commitment to new product development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 118-131, February.
    17. Young Sik Cho & Kevin Linderman, 2020. "Resource-Based Product and Process Innovation Model: Theory Development and Empirical Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Lii, Peirchyi & Kuo, Fang-I, 2016. "Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 142-155.
    19. Dai, Jing & Cantor, David E. & Montabon, Frank L., 2017. "Examining corporate environmental proactivity and operational performance: A strategy-structure-capabilities-performance perspective within a green context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 272-280.
    20. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:143:y:2013:i:2:p:242-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.