IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v603y2022ics0378437122004265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group relations, resilience and the I Ching

Author

Listed:
  • Schweitzer, Frank

Abstract

We evaluate the robustness and adaptivity of social groups with heterogeneous agents that are characterized by their binary state, their ability to change this state, their status and their preferred relations to other agents. To define group structures, we operationalize the hexagrams of the I Ching. The relations and properties of agents are used to quantify their influence according to the social impact theory. From these influence values we derive a weighted stability measure for triads involving three agents, which is based on the weighted balance theory. It allows to quantify the robustness of groups and to propose a novel measure for group resilience which combines robustness and adaptivity. A stochastic approach determines the probabilities to find robust and adaptive groups. The discussion focuses on the generalization of our approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Schweitzer, Frank, 2022. "Group relations, resilience and the I Ching," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:603:y:2022:i:c:s0378437122004265
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437122004265
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127630?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Kułakowski & M. Stojkow & D. Żuchowska-Skiba, 2020. "Heider balance, prejudices and size effect," The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 129-137, July.
    2. Du, Haifeng & He, Xiaochen & Wang, Jingjing & Feldman, Marcus W., 2018. "Reversing structural balance in signed networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 780-792.
    3. Patrick Groeber & Frank Schweitzer & Kerstin Press, 2009. "How Groups Can Foster Consensus: The Case of Local Cultures," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(2), pages 1-4.
    4. Hołyst, Janusz A. & Kacperski, Krzysztof & Schweitzer, Frank, 2000. "Phase transitions in social impact models of opinion formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 199-210.
    5. André Grow & Andreas Flache & Rafael Wittek, 2015. "An Agent-Based Model of Status Construction in Task Focused Groups," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(2), pages 1-4.
    6. Frank Schweitzer & Tamas Krivachy & David Garcia, 2020. "An Agent-Based Model of Opinion Polarization Driven by Emotions," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-11, April.
    7. Andres M Belaza & Kevin Hoefman & Jan Ryckebusch & Aaron Bramson & Milan van den Heuvel & Koen Schoors, 2017. "Statistical physics of balance theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Omid Askarisichani & Jacqueline Ng Lane & Francesco Bullo & Noah E. Friedkin & Ambuj K. Singh & Brian Uzzi, 2019. "Structural balance emerges and explains performance in risky decision-making," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Schweitzer, Frank, 2021. "Social percolation revisited: From 2d lattices to adaptive networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 570(C).
    10. Simon Schweighofer & Frank Schweitzer & David Garcia, 2020. "A Weighted Balance Model of Opinion Hyperpolarization," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 23(3), pages 1-5.
    11. F. Schweitzer & L. Behera, 2009. "Nonlinear voter models: the transition from invasion to coexistence," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 67(3), pages 301-318, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ambra Amico & Luca Verginer & Giona Casiraghi & Giacomo Vaccario & Frank Schweitzer, 2023. "Adapting to Disruptions: Flexibility as a Pillar of Supply Chain Resilience," Papers 2304.05290, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hang-Hyun Jo & Jeoung-Yoo Kim, 2012. "Competitive Targeted Marketing," ISER Discussion Paper 0834, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    2. Belaza, Andres M. & Ryckebusch, Jan & Bramson, Aaron & Casert, Corneel & Hoefman, Kevin & Schoors, Koen & van den Heuvel, Milan & Vandermarliere, Benjamin, 2019. "Social stability and extended social balance—Quantifying the role of inactive links in social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 518(C), pages 270-284.
    3. Giacomo Vaccario & Mario V. Tomasello & Claudio J. Tessone & Frank Schweitzer, 2018. "Quantifying knowledge exchange in R&D networks: a data-driven model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 461-493, August.
    4. Mario V. Tomasello & Claudio J. Tessone & Frank Schweitzer, 2016. "A Model Of Dynamic Rewiring And Knowledge Exchange In R&D Networks," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01n02), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Schweitzer, Frank, 2021. "Social percolation revisited: From 2d lattices to adaptive networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 570(C).
    6. Sheykhali, Somaye & Darooneh, Amir Hossein & Jafari, Gholam Reza, 2020. "Partial balance in social networks with stubborn links," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 548(C).
    7. Hutzler, S. & Sommer, C. & Richmond, P., 2016. "On the relationship between income, fertility rates and the state of democracy in society," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 452(C), pages 9-18.
    8. Katarzyna Ostasiewicz & Michal H. Tyc & Piotr Goliczewski & Piotr Magnuszewski & Andrzej Radosz & Jan Sendzimir, 2006. "Integrating economic and psychological insights in binary choice models with social interactions," Papers physics/0609170, arXiv.org.
    9. J. Lorenz & S. Battiston & F. Schweitzer, 2009. "Systemic risk in a unifying framework for cascading processes on networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 71(4), pages 441-460, October.
    10. Jędrzejewski, Arkadiusz & Sznajd-Weron, Katarzyna, 2018. "Impact of memory on opinion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 306-315.
    11. Patrick Mellacher, 2021. "Opinion Dynamics with Conflicting Interests," Papers 2111.09408, arXiv.org.
    12. Sven Banisch & Tanya Araújo & Jorge Louçã, 2010. "Opinion Dynamics And Communication Networks," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 95-111.
    13. Weimer-Jehle, Wolfgang, 2008. "Cross-impact balances," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(14), pages 3689-3700.
    14. Grabowski, A. & Kosiński, R.A., 2006. "Ising-based model of opinion formation in a complex network of interpersonal interactions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 361(2), pages 651-664.
    15. Alberto Vancheri & Paolo Giordano & Denise Andrey & Sergio Albeverio, 2008. "Urban Growth Processes Joining Cellular Automata and Multiagent Systems. Part 1: Theory and Models," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(4), pages 723-739, August.
    16. Xiaochen He & Haifeng Du & Marcus W Feldman & Guangyu Li, 2019. "Information diffusion in signed networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Barunik, J. & Vosvrda, M., 2009. "Can a stochastic cusp catastrophe model explain stock market crashes?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1824-1836, October.
    18. Katz, Yuri A. & Biem, Alain, 2021. "Time-resolved topological data analysis of market instabilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    19. Nastaran Allahyari & Amir Kargaran & Ali Hosseiny & G R Jafari, 2022. "The structure balance of gene-gene networks beyond pairwise interactions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Mellacher, Patrick, 2023. "The impact of corona populism: Empirical evidence from Austria and theory," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 113-140.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:603:y:2022:i:c:s0378437122004265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.