IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v568y2021ics0378437120309602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Five degrees of randomness

Author

Listed:
  • Eliazar, Iddo

Abstract

Randomness is omnipresent, and hence the quantification of randomness is a fundamental necessity across the sciences. As “necessity is the mother of invention”, scientists devised various approaches to quantify randomness: statistics uses standard deviation; statistical physics and information theory use entropies (e.g. Shannon); socioeconomics uses inequality indices (e.g. Gini); and ecology uses diversity indices (e.g. Simpson). Alternative to these approaches – which are all continuous quantifications – Mandelbrot suggested a radically different approach: a digital categorization of randomness. Inspired by Mandelbrot, here we showcase a digital categorization comprising five degrees of randomness — á la the Saffir–Simpson hurricane scale, and á la the DEFCON states of defense readiness. Using the reliability-engineering notion of hazard rates, we present a comprehensive study of the digital categorization. From a scholarly viewpoint, we unveil the categorization’s profound connections to Gibbs measures in statistical physics, and to the following probability-theory notions: heavy tails, long tails, slow variation, regular variation, and rapid variation. From an applicative viewpoint, we demonstrate the categorization’s potency and usability. This paper is relevant to wide audiences: theoreticians and practitioners that are tackling random systems and processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliazar, Iddo, 2021. "Five degrees of randomness," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 568(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:568:y:2021:i:c:s0378437120309602
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437120309602
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aaberge, Rolf & Mogstad, Magne & Peragine, Vito, 2011. "Measuring long-term inequality of opportunity," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 193-204.
    2. Cowell, Frank, 2011. "Measuring Inequality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199594047.
    3. Maxim Finkelstein, 2008. "Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84800-986-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shweta Bahl & Ajay Sharma, 2021. "Education–Occupation Mismatch and Dispersion in Returns to Education: Evidence from India," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 251-298, January.
    2. Alvaredo, Facundo & Cogneau, Denis & Piketty, Thomas, 2021. "Income inequality under colonial rule. Evidence from French Algeria, Cameroon, Tunisia, and Vietnam and comparisons with British colonies 1920–1960," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Yonatan Berman, 2022. "The Long-Run Evolution of Absolute Intergenerational Mobility," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 61-83, July.
    4. Tatjana Miljkovic & Ying-Ju Chen, 2021. "A new computational approach for estimation of the Gini index based on grouped data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 2289-2311, September.
    5. Bhuller, Manudeep & Mogstad, Magne & Salvanes, Kjell G., 2011. "Life-Cycle Bias and the Returns to Schooling in Current and Lifetime Earnings," IZA Discussion Papers 5788, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Kaltenberg, Mary & Foster-McGregor, Neil, 2020. "The impact of automation on inequality across Europe," MERIT Working Papers 2020-009, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    7. Miia Bask & Mikael Bask, 2015. "Cumulative (Dis)Advantage and the Matthew Effect in Life-Course Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Ausloos, Marcel, 2020. "Rank–size law, financial inequality indices and gain concentrations by cyclist teams. The case of a multiple stage bicycle race, like Tour de France," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    9. Enora Belz, 2019. "Estimating Inequality Measures from Quantile Data," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 2019-09, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
    10. Kotschy, Rainer, 2022. "Health improvements impact income inequality," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    11. Bach, Stefan & Thiemann, Andreas & Zucco, Aline, 2019. "Looking for the missing rich: tracing the top tail of the wealth distribution," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(6), pages 1234-1258.
    12. Mariko I Ito & Hisashi Ohtsuki & Akira Sasaki, 2018. "Emergence of opinion leaders in reference networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Michael Albertus & Thomas Brambor & Ricardo Ceneviva, 2018. "Land Inequality and Rural Unrest," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 62(3), pages 557-596, March.
    14. Pablo A. Mitnik & Anne-Line Helsø & Victoria L. Bryant, 2020. "Inequality of Opportunity for Income in Denmark and the United States: A Comparison Based on Administrative Data," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring Distribution and Mobility of Income and Wealth, pages 317-382, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Rolando I. Valdez & Francisco García-Fernández, 2022. "The distribution of wage inequality across municipalities in Mexico: a spatial quantile regression approach," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(3), pages 669-697, September.
    16. Hodler, Roland & Srisuma, Sorawoot & Vesperoni, Alberto & Zurlinden, Noémie, 2020. "Measuring ethnic stratification and its effect on trust in Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    17. Christopher J. Boudreaux & Niklas Elert & Magnus Henrekson & David S. Lucas, 2022. "Entrepreneurial accessibility, eudaimonic well-being, and inequality," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1061-1079, October.
    18. Burauel, Patrick & Caliendo, Marco & Grabka, Markus M. & Obst, Cosima & Preuss, Malte & Schröder, Carsten & Shupe, Cortnie, 2020. "The Impact of the German Minimum Wage on Individual Wages and Monthly Earnings," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 240(2/3), pages 201-231.
    19. Amparo Ba'illo & Javier C'arcamo & Carlos Mora-Corral, 2021. "Extremal points of Lorenz curves and applications to inequality analysis," Papers 2103.03286, arXiv.org.
    20. Willem DEVRIENDT & Freddy HEYLEN, 2020. "Macroeconomic and Distributional Effects of Demographic Change in an Open Economy - The Case of Belgium," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 86(1), pages 87-124, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:568:y:2021:i:c:s0378437120309602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.