IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v563y2021ics0378437120307925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on risk propagation method of multimodal transport network under uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Jingni
  • Xu, Junxiang
  • He, Zhenggang
  • Liao, Wei

Abstract

Taking multimodal transport network as the research object, a quantitative method of risk propagation based on improved percolation theory is proposed. This paper analyzes the applicability and limitations of the percolation theory for this problem, and improves such four aspects of nodes and edges as the state, the initial load, the percolation probability and the evaluation index of percolation effect, so that they are universal to the risk propagation of the transport network. Taking Sichuan–Tibet​ region as an example for empirical analysis, this paper simulates and analyzes the risk propagation law of the multimodal transport network under different attack types and load preferences. The results show that the risk propagation effect in the multimodal transport network will become stronger with the increase of attack scale and attack intensity, and it will show an exponential growth trend with the increase of attack scale. When other conditions are the same, the order of strength of the three kinds of attack law according to the risk propagation effect is: the intentional attack based on the loads > the random attack > the intentional attack based on the failure probability; the risk propagation effect of the load with preferences is stronger than that without preferences. Therefore, managers can control the risk of multimodal transport network in Sichuan and Tibet from the perspective of controlling attack types and balancing load preference. The research improves the method of risk propagation simulation, makes up for the shortcomings of existing research which neglects the subjectivity of load and the dynamics of risk propagation, and makes it closer to the reality, which is of strong practical value and theoretical significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Jingni & Xu, Junxiang & He, Zhenggang & Liao, Wei, 2021. "Research on risk propagation method of multimodal transport network under uncertainty," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:563:y:2021:i:c:s0378437120307925
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437120307925
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    2. Zhukov, Dmitry & Khvatova, Tatiana & Lesko, Sergey & Zaltcman, Anastasia, 2018. "Managing social networks: Applying the percolation theory methodology to understand individuals' attitudes and moods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 297-307.
    3. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Peng, Xingzhao & Yao, Hong & Du, Jun & Wang, Zhe & Ding, Chao, 2015. "Invulnerability of scale-free network against critical node failures based on a renewed cascading failure model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 421(C), pages 69-77.
    5. Zhenggang He & Jing-Ni Guo & Jun-Xiang Xu, 2019. "Cascade Failure Model in Multimodal Transport Network Risk Propagation," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-7, December.
    6. Zhang, Yongping & Lin, Diao & Liu, Xiaoyue Cathy, 2019. "Biking islands in cities: An analysis combining bike trajectory and percolation theory," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Li, Daqing & Zhang, Qiong & Zio, Enrico & Havlin, Shlomo & Kang, Rui, 2015. "Network reliability analysis based on percolation theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 556-562.
    8. Wang, Shuliang & Zhang, Jianhua & Yue, Xin, 2018. "Multiple robustness assessment method for understanding structural and functional characteristics of the power network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 261-270.
    9. Qi, Xiaogang & Yang, Guizhen & Liu, Lifang, 2020. "Robustness analysis of the networks in cascading failures with controllable parameters," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 539(C).
    10. Xue-Jun Zhang & Bo Gu & Xiang-Min Guan & Yan-Bo Zhu & Ren-Li Lv, 2016. "Cascading failure in scale-free networks with tunable clustering," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 27(08), pages 1-10, August.
    11. Hao, Yucheng & Jia, Limin & Wang, Yanhui, 2020. "Robustness of weighted networks with the harmonic closeness against cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 541(C).
    12. Fu, Xiuwen & Yang, Yongsheng, 2020. "Modeling and analysis of cascading node-link failures in multi-sink wireless sensor networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Qing & Zou, Xingqi & Ye, Yunting & Yao, Tao, 2022. "Evaluating the criticality of the product development project portfolio network from the perspective of risk propagation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 593(C).
    2. Riqing Liao & Wei Liu & Yuandao Yuan, 2023. "Resilience Improvement and Risk Management of Multimodal Transport Logistics in the Post–COVID-19 Era: The Case of TIR-Based Sea–Road Multimodal Transport Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Ping Yu & Peiwen Wang & Zhiping Wang & Jia Wang, 2022. "Supply Chain Risk Diffusion Model Considering Multi-Factor Influences under Hypernetwork Vision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    2. Shoji, Isao & Kanehiro, Sumei, 2016. "Disposition effect as a behavioral trading activity elicited by investors' different risk preferences," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-112.
    3. Jonathan Meng & Feng Fu, 2020. "Understanding Gambling Behavior and Risk Attitudes Using Cryptocurrency-based Casino Blockchain Data," Papers 2008.05653, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    4. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    5. Boone, Jan & Sadrieh, Abdolkarim & van Ours, Jan C., 2009. "Experiments on unemployment benefit sanctions and job search behavior," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 937-951, November.
    6. Castro, Luciano de & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kim, Jeong Yeol & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel & Olmo, Jose, 2022. "Experiments on portfolio selection: A comparison between quantile preferences and expected utility decision models," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Jos'e Cl'audio do Nascimento, 2019. "Behavioral Biases and Nonadditive Dynamics in Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation," Papers 1908.01709, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    8. Francesco GUALA, 2017. "Preferences: Neither Behavioural nor Mental," Departmental Working Papers 2017-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    9. Bin Zou, 2017. "Optimal Investment In Hedge Funds Under Loss Aversion," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-32, May.
    10. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2019. "What are axiomatizations good for?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 339-359, May.
    11. Wiafe, Osei K. & Basu, Anup K. & Chen, En Te, 2020. "Portfolio choice after retirement: Should self-annuitisation strategies hold more equities?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 241-255.
    12. Nicholas Barberis, 2012. "A Model of Casino Gambling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 35-51, January.
    13. Lovric, M. & Kaymak, U. & Spronk, J., 2008. "A Conceptual Model of Investor Behavior," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-030-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. Goytom Abraha Kahsay & Daniel Osberghaus, 2018. "Storm Damage and Risk Preferences: Panel Evidence from Germany," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(1), pages 301-318, September.
    15. Carolin Bock & Maximilian Schmidt, 2015. "Should I stay, or should I go? – How fund dynamics influence venture capital exit decisions," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 68-82, November.
    16. Hooi Hooi Lean & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2013. "Risk-averse and Risk-seeking Investor Preferences for Oil Spot and Futures," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2013-31, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico, revised Aug 2013.
    17. Paredes-Frigolett, Harold, 2016. "Modeling the effect of responsible research and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 126-133.
    18. Karle, Heiko & Schumacher, Heiner & Vølund, Rune, 2023. "Consumer loss aversion and scale-dependent psychological switching costs," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 214-237.
    19. Christian Gollier & James Hammitt & Nicolas Treich, 2013. "Risk and choice: A research saga," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 129-145, October.
    20. Carter, Steven & McBride, Michael, 2013. "Experienced utility versus decision utility: Putting the ‘S’ in satisfaction," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 13-23.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:563:y:2021:i:c:s0378437120307925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.