IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v550y2020ics0378437119321600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tripartite evolutionary game analysis for “Deceive acquaintances” behavior of e-commerce platforms in cooperative supervision

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Bin
  • Cheng, Jing
  • Qi, Yuqing

Abstract

In the growing e-commerce market, “deceitful pricing for acquaintances” has increasingly attracted widespread attention from all walks of life. To protect the rights of consumers and maintain the sustainable development of e-commerce market, an evolutionary game model in accordance with PT-MA (Prospect Theory and Mental Account) is developed from the perspective of cooperative supervision between the government and consumers. Through theoretical derivation and simulation analysis, it is suggested that the evolution game of participants’ strategy does not have stable equilibrium point. Increasing the cost reference point and reducing the valance reference point can quickly reduce the probability of “deceitful pricing for acquaintances” and non-supervision. The greater the punishment will be, the e-commerce platforms are more likely to adopt the strategy of “non-deceitful pricing for acquaintances”. Increasing cooperative income and commission coefficient can encourage the government to adopt supervision strategies and make consumers participate in supervision. The results can guide the participants to make better decisions on e-commerce market.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Bin & Cheng, Jing & Qi, Yuqing, 2020. "Tripartite evolutionary game analysis for “Deceive acquaintances” behavior of e-commerce platforms in cooperative supervision," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 550(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:550:y:2020:i:c:s0378437119321600
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437119321600
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2019.123892?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hajli, Nick & Sims, Julian, 2015. "Social commerce: The transfer of power from sellers to buyers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 350-358.
    2. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    3. Richard H. Thaler, 2008. "Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 15-25, 01-02.
    4. Yao Cui & Izak Duenyas & Ozge Sahin, 2018. "Unbundling of Ancillary Service: How Does Price Discrimination of Main Service Matter?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 455-466, July.
    5. Fang, Debin & Zhao, Chaoyang & Yu, Qian, 2018. "Government regulation of renewable energy generation and transmission in China’s electricity market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 775-793.
    6. Weiwei Liu & Jianing Yang, 2018. "The Evolutionary Game Theoretic Analysis for Sustainable Cooperation Relationship of Collaborative Innovation Network in Strategic Emerging Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Matsui, Kenji, 2018. "When and what wholesale and retail prices should be set in multi-channel supply chains?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 540-554.
    8. Felix C Brodbeck & Katharina G Kugler & Julia A M Reif & Markus A Maier, 2013. "Morals Matter in Economic Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-1, December.
    9. Kao, Kuo-Feng & Hwang, Hong, 2017. "Input price discrimination, technology licensing and social welfare," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 446-456.
    10. Rieger, Marc Oliver, 2014. "Evolutionary stability of prospect theory preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Feng Jie Xie & Jing Shi, 2018. "The Evolution of Price Competition Game on Complex Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, July.
    12. Hódsági, Kristóf & Szabó, György, 2019. "Bursts in three-strategy evolutionary ordinal potential games on a square lattice," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 1379-1387.
    13. Zhou, Yong-Wu & Cao, Bin & Tang, Qinshen & Zhou, Wenhui, 2017. "Pricing and rebate strategies for an e-shop with a cashback website," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 108-122.
    14. Marie Devaine & Guillaume Hollard & Jean Daunizeau, 2014. "Theory of Mind: Did Evolution Fool Us?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-12, February.
    15. Ki-Eun Rhee & Raphael Thomadsen, 2017. "Behavior-Based Pricing in Vertically Differentiated Industries," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(8), pages 2729-2740, August.
    16. Al-Mutairi, M.S. & Hipel, K.W. & Kamel, M.S., 2008. "Trust and cooperation from a fuzzy perspective," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 76(5), pages 430-446.
    17. Heywood, John S. & Wang, Shiqiang & Ye, Guangliang, 2018. "Resale price maintenance and spatial price discrimination," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 147-174.
    18. Danias, Nikolaos & Swales, J. Kim, 2018. "The welfare impacts of discriminatory price tariffs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 321-331.
    19. Li, Yan & Liu, Xinsheng & Claussen, Jens Christian, 2019. "Compulsory persistent cooperation in continuous public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 531(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shao, Quan & Yuan, Jia, 2022. "Study on the disposal strategy of civil aviation passenger collective events based on evolutionary game theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 598(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martín Egozcue & Sébastien Massoni & Wing-Keung Wong & RiÄ ardas Zitikis, 2012. "Integration-segregation decisions under general value functions: "Create your own bundle — choose 1, 2, or all 3!"," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 12057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    2. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    3. Karle, Heiko & Schumacher, Heiner & Vølund, Rune, 2023. "Consumer loss aversion and scale-dependent psychological switching costs," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 214-237.
    4. Duncan Luce, R., 1997. "Associative joint receipts," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 51-74, August.
    5. Uri Gneezy & Jan Potters, 1997. "An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(2), pages 631-645.
    6. Martin Kukuk & Stefan Winter, 2008. "An Alternative Explanation of the Favorite-Longshot Bias," Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, University of Buckingham Press, vol. 2(2), pages 79-96, September.
    7. Moshe Levy & Haim Levy, 2013. "Prospect Theory: Much Ado About Nothing?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 7, pages 129-144, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Eriksen, Kristoffer W. & Kvaløy, Ola, 2014. "Myopic risk-taking in tournaments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 37-46.
    9. Jakusch, Sven Thorsten, 2017. "On the applicability of maximum likelihood methods: From experimental to financial data," SAFE Working Paper Series 148, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2017.
    10. Hongjuan Song & Yushi Jiang, 2019. "Dynamic pricing decisions by potential tourists under uncertainty: The effects of tourism advertising," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(2), pages 213-234, March.
    11. Manel Baucells & Silvia Bellezza, 2017. "Temporal Profiles of Instant Utility During Anticipation, Event, and Recall," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 729-748, March.
    12. Kim Kaivanto, 2014. "The Effect of Decentralized Behavioral Decision Making on System‐Level Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(12), pages 2121-2142, December.
    13. Pedro Bordalo & Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, 2013. "Salience and Consumer Choice," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 121(5), pages 803-843.
    14. Sanjit Dhami & Narges Hajimoladarvish, 2020. "Mental Accounting, Loss Aversion, and Tax Evasion: Theory and Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 8606, CESifo.
    15. Cho, Young-Hee & Duncan Luce, R. & Truong, Lan, 2002. "Duplex decomposition and general segregation of lotteries of a gain and a loss: An empirical evaluation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 1176-1193, November.
    16. Bowman, David & Minehart, Deborah & Rabin, Matthew, 1999. "Loss aversion in a consumption-savings model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 155-178, February.
    17. Hopfensitz, Astrid & Wranik, Tanja, 2008. "Psychological and environmental determinants of myopic loss aversion," MPRA Paper 9305, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Francisco Gomes & Michael Haliassos & Tarun Ramadorai, 2021. "Household Finance," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(3), pages 919-1000, September.
    19. M. Pelé & M. Broihanne & B. Thierry & J. Call & V. Dufour, 2014. "To bet or not to bet? Decision-making under risk in non-human primates," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 141-166, October.
    20. Weber, Martin & Welfens, Frank, 2007. "The repurchase behavior of individual investors : an experimental investigation," Papers 07-44, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:550:y:2020:i:c:s0378437119321600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.