IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v85y2024ics0927538x24001161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The enhanced benefits of ESG in portfolios: A multi-factor model perspective based on LightGBM

Author

Listed:
  • Gong, Xiaomin
  • Xie, Fei
  • Zhou, Zhongsheng
  • Zhang, Chenyang

Abstract

This paper explores the enhanced benefits of ESG in portfolio models from the perspective of a multi-factor prediction model. Firstly, using the traditional Barra multi-factor model as a basis, the Fama-Macbeth test is employed to evaluate the explanatory power of the multi-factor model after incorporating the ESG factor. Considering the non-linear nature of ESG factors, the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model is utilized for feature identification and optimization, thereby enhancing the accuracy of predicted returns in the multi-factor model. Secondly, two portfolio models, namely Barra+ESG+MV and Barra+ESG+BL models, are constructed by introducing the predicted returns based on Barra and ESG factors into Mean-Variance (MV) and Black-Litterman (BL) models, respectively. This facilitates a further analysis of the benefits of ESG in asset portfolios. Finally, the advanced BPZ model is used to examine the robustness of the gain effect attributed to the environmental (E), social (S), and corporate governance (G) factors in ESG from a non-linear perspective. The findings reveal that ESG significantly improves portfolio performance, particularly in terms of reducing systematic risk. Furthermore, the E, S, and G factors bring universal enhancement effect to the multi-factor model. This study provides new avenues for research on ESG in portfolio management.

Suggested Citation

  • Gong, Xiaomin & Xie, Fei & Zhou, Zhongsheng & Zhang, Chenyang, 2024. "The enhanced benefits of ESG in portfolios: A multi-factor model perspective based on LightGBM," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:85:y:2024:i:c:s0927538x24001161
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X24001161
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:85:y:2024:i:c:s0927538x24001161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.