IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v71y2006i1p16-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finite difference procedures for solving a problem arising in modeling and design of certain optoelectronic devices

Author

Listed:
  • Dehghan, Mehdi

Abstract

Several finite difference schemes are discussed for solving the two-dimensional Schrodinger equation with Dirichlet’s boundary conditions. We use three fully implicit finite difference schemes, two fully explicit finite difference techniques, an alternating direction implicit procedure and the Barakat and Clark type explicit formula. Theoretical and numerical comparisons between four families of methods are described. The main advantage of the alternating direction implicit finite difference technique is that the bandwidth of the sets of equations is a fixed small number that depends only on the nature of the computational molecule. This allows the use of very efficient and very fast techniques for solving the resulting tridiagonal systems of linear algebraic equations. The unique advantage of the Barakat and Clark technique is that it is unconditionally stable and is explicit in nature. Numerical results are presented followed by concluding remarks.

Suggested Citation

  • Dehghan, Mehdi, 2006. "Finite difference procedures for solving a problem arising in modeling and design of certain optoelectronic devices," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 16-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:71:y:2006:i:1:p:16-30
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2005.10.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475405002259
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2005.10.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dehghan, Mehdi, 1999. "Implicit locally one-dimensional methods for two-dimensional diffusion with a non-local boundary condition," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 331-349.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pathak, Maheshwar & Joshi, Pratibha & Nisar, Kottakkaran Sooppy, 2022. "Numerical study of generalized 2-D nonlinear Schrödinger equation using Kansa method," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 186-198.
    2. Mohammadi, Reza, 2018. "Smooth Quintic spline approximation for nonlinear Schrödinger equations with variable coefficients in one and two dimensions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 204-215.
    3. Dehghan, Mehdi & Shokri, Ali, 2008. "A numerical method for solution of the two-dimensional sine-Gordon equation using the radial basis functions," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 700-715.
    4. Dehghan, Mehdi & Mohebbi, Akbar, 2008. "High-order compact boundary value method for the solution of unsteady convection–diffusion problems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 683-699.
    5. Dehghan, Mehdi & Gharibi, Zeinab, 2021. "Numerical analysis of fully discrete energy stable weak Galerkin finite element Scheme for a coupled Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes phase-field model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 410(C).
    6. Ghosh, Suchismita & Deb, Anish & Sarkar, Gautam, 2016. "Taylor series approach for function approximation using ‘estimated’ higher derivatives," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 284(C), pages 89-101.
    7. Ballestra, Luca Vincenzo & Pacelli, Graziella & Radi, Davide, 2016. "A very efficient approach for pricing barrier options on an underlying described by the mixed fractional Brownian motion," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 240-248.
    8. Luo, Yidong, 2020. "Galerkin method with trigonometric basis on stable numerical differentiation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    9. Kenzu Abdella & Jeet Trivedi, 2020. "Solving Multi-Point Boundary Value Problems Using Sinc-Derivative Interpolation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Dehghan, Mehdi & Saadatmandi, Abbas, 2009. "Variational iteration method for solving the wave equation subject to an integral conservation condition," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 1448-1453.
    11. Guo, Geyang & Lü, Shujuan & Liu, Bo, 2015. "Unconditional stability of alternating difference schemes with variable time steplengthes for dispersive equation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 262(C), pages 249-259.
    12. Nehad Ali Shah & Ioannis Dassios & Essam R. El-Zahar & Jae Dong Chung & Somaye Taherifar, 2021. "The Variational Iteration Transform Method for Solving the Time-Fractional Fornberg–Whitham Equation and Comparison with Decomposition Transform Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Shi, Dongyang & Liao, Xin & Wang, Lele, 2016. "Superconvergence analysis of conforming finite element method for nonlinear Schrödinger equation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 289(C), pages 298-310.
    14. Gao, Yali & Mei, Liquan & Li, Rui, 2018. "Galerkin methods for the Davey–Stewartson equations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 144-161.
    15. Kaur, Navneet & Joshi, Varun, 2024. "Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation: Numerical solution using two quintic B-splines and differential quadrature method," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 105-127.
    16. Wang, Hanquan & Ma, Xiu & Lu, Junliang & Gao, Wen, 2017. "An efficient time-splitting compact finite difference method for Gross–Pitaevskii equation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 131-144.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:71:y:2006:i:1:p:16-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.