IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v68y2005i1p9-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving a multiresponse simulation-optimization problem with discrete variables using a multiple-attribute decision-making method

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Taho
  • Chou, Pohung

Abstract

The simulation model is a proven tool in solving nonlinear and stochastic problems and allows examination of the likely behavior of a proposed manufacturing system under selected conditions. However, it does not provide a method for optimization. A practical problem often embodies many characteristics of a multiresponse optimization problem. The present paper proposes to solve the multiresponse simulation-optimization problem by a multiple-attribute decision-making method—a technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The method assumes that the control factors have discrete values and that each control factor has exactly three control levels. Taguchi quality-loss functions are adapted to model the factor mean and variance effects. TOPSIS is then used to find the surrogate objective function for the multiple responses. The present paper predicts the system performances for any combination of levels of the control factors by using the main effects of the control factors according to the principles of a robust design method. The optimal design can then be obtained. A practical case study from an integrated-circuit packaging company illustrates the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed method. Finally, constraints of the proposed method are addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Taho & Chou, Pohung, 2005. "Solving a multiresponse simulation-optimization problem with discrete variables using a multiple-attribute decision-making method," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 9-21.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:68:y:2005:i:1:p:9-21
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2004.09.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475404002563
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2004.09.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T Yang & L Tseng, 2002. "Solving a multi-objective simulation model using a hybrid response surface method and lexicographical goal programming approach—a case study on integrated circuit ink-marking machines," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(2), pages 211-221, February.
    2. S-K S Fan & E del Castillo, 1999. "Calculation of an optimal region of operation for dual response systems fitted from experimental data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(8), pages 826-836, August.
    3. Azadivar, Farhad & Lee, Young-Hae, 1988. "Optimization of discrete variable stochastic systems by computer simulation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 331-345.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Taho & Wen, Yuan-Feng & Wang, Fang-Fang, 2011. "Evaluation of robustness of supply chain information-sharing strategies using a hybrid Taguchi and multiple criteria decision-making method," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 458-466, December.
    2. Kannan, Govindan & Pokharel, Shaligram & Sasi Kumar, P., 2009. "A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 28-36.
    3. Kuo, Yiyo & Yang, Taho & Cho, Chiwoon & Tseng, Yao-Ching, 2008. "Using simulation and multi-criteria methods to provide robust solutions to dispatching problems in a flow shop with multiple processors," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 40-56.
    4. Yao, Shiqing & Jiang, Zhibin & Li, Na & Zhang, Huai & Geng, Na, 2011. "A multi-objective dynamic scheduling approach using multiple attribute decision making in semiconductor manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 125-133, March.
    5. Dengiz, Berna & İç, Yusuf Tansel & Belgin, Onder, 2016. "A meta-model based simulation optimization using hybrid simulation-analytical modeling to increase the productivity in automotive industry," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 120-128.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Botes, J. H. F. & Bosch, D. J. & Oosthuizen, L. K., 1996. "A simulation and optimization approach for evaluating irrigation information," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 165-183, June.
    2. Kleijnen, J.P.C. & Biles, B.E., 1999. "A Java-based simulation manager for optimization and response surface methodology in multiple-response parallel simulation," Other publications TiSEM 628a280a-c055-4fa2-9d54-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Azadivar, Farhad & Tompkins, George, 1999. "Simulation optimization with qualitative variables and structural model changes: A genetic algorithm approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 169-182, February.
    4. Hachicha, Wafik & Ammeri, Ahmed & Masmoudi, Faouzi & Chachoub, Habib, 2010. "A comprehensive literature classification of simulation optimisation methods," MPRA Paper 27652, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Kazmierczak, Richard F., Jr., 1990. "Analyzing Complex Dynamic Bioeconomic Systems Using A Simulation Optimization Technique," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270852, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Yang, Taho & Fu, Hsin-Pin & Yang, Kuang-Yi, 2007. "An evolutionary-simulation approach for the optimization of multi-constant work-in-process strategy--A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 104-114, May.
    7. E Angün & J Kleijnen & D den Hertog & G Gürkan, 2009. "Response surface methodology with stochastic constraints for expensive simulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(6), pages 735-746, June.
    8. Angun, M.E., 2004. "Black box simulation optimization : Generalized response surface methodology," Other publications TiSEM 2548e953-54ce-44e2-8c5b-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Arsham H., 1998. "Techniques for Monte Carlo Optimizing," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 181-230, December.
    10. Kazmierczak, Richard F., Jr., 1996. "Optimizing Complex Bioeconomic Simulations Using An Efficient Search Heuristic," DAE Research Reports 31661, Louisiana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness.
    11. Oriade, Caleb A. & Dillon, Carl R., 1997. "Developments in biophysical and bioeconomic simulation of agricultural systems: a review," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 45-58, October.
    12. Noguera, Jose H. & Watson, Edward F., 2006. "Response surface analysis of a multi-product batch processing facility using a simulation metamodel," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 333-343, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:68:y:2005:i:1:p:9-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.