IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v42y2013icp210-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry response to the 2003 set net restrictions for protection of Maui′s dolphin

Author

Listed:
  • Stewart, James
  • Callagher, Peter

Abstract

Marine reserves and gear restrictions are common forms of marine resource management; they impact on fishers both directly and indirectly. In 2003 New Zealand set net fishers were required to abandon set netting along a substantial section of the North Island′s West Coast in order to eliminate the chance of entangling the critically endangered Maui′s dolphin. A study of some 100 set net fishers, found that the immediate, and short term effects of the 2003 set netting area closures had little impact on the catch and effort levels of fishers. Participation in the fishery increased immediately prior to the restrictions and remained at a similar level for the following four years. Incumbent fishers performed better than new entrants and exiters. Trends in Annual Catch Entitlement (ACE) prices appear not to have been affected by the set net restrictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Stewart, James & Callagher, Peter, 2013. "Industry response to the 2003 set net restrictions for protection of Maui′s dolphin," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 210-222.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:42:y:2013:i:c:p:210-222
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.02.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X1300064X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.02.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stewart, James & Walshe, Kim, 2008. "Compliance costs and the small fisher: A study of exiters from the New Zealand fishery," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 120-131, January.
    2. James M. Stewart & Peter D. Callagher, 2003. "New Zealand fisheries management: changes in property rights structure and implications for sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 69-76.
    3. Whitmarsh, David & James, Carl & Pickering, Helen & Neiland, Arthur, 2000. "The profitability of marine commercial fisheries: a review of economic information needs with particular reference to the UK," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 257-263, May.
    4. Pradhan, Naresh C. & Leung, PingSun, 2004. "Modeling entry, stay, and exit decisions of the longline fishers in Hawaii," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 311-324, July.
    5. Stewart, James & Callagher, Peter, 2011. "Quota concentration in the New Zealand fishery: Annual catch entitlement and the small fisher," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 631-646, September.
    6. Stewart, James & Walshe, Kim & Moodie, Beverley, 2006. "The demise of the small fisher? A profile of exiters from the New Zealand fishery," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 328-340, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stewart, James & Leaver, Jonathan, 2015. "Efficiency of the New Zealand annual catch entitlement market," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 11-22.
    2. Pinkerton, Evelyn, 2015. "The role of moral economy in two British Columbia fisheries: Confronting neoliberal policies," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 410-419.
    3. Quinn Weninger, 2008. "Economic Benefits of Management Reform in the Gulf of Mexico Grouper Fishery: A Semi-parametric Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 41(4), pages 479-497, December.
    4. Keita Abe & Linda Nøstbakken & Mads Fjeld Wold, 2024. "Quota Consolidation in Norwegian Coastal Fisheries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(5), pages 1295-1326, May.
    5. Barr, Rhona F. & Mourato, Susana, 2014. "Investigating fishers' preferences for the design of marine Payments for Environmental Services schemes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 91-103.
    6. Cooper, Rachel & Jarre, Astrid, 2017. "An Agent-based Model of the South African Offshore Hake Trawl Industry: Part II Drivers and Trade-offs in Profit and Risk," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 257-267.
    7. Evans, K. & Young, J.W. & Nicol, S. & Kolody, D. & Allain, V. & Bell, J. & Brown, J.N. & Ganachaud, A. & Hobday, A.J. & Hunt, B. & Innes, J. & Gupta, A. Sen & van Sebille, E. & Kloser, R. & Patterson,, 2015. "Optimising fisheries management in relation to tuna catches in the western central Pacific Ocean: A review of research priorities and opportunities," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 94-104.
    8. Speir, Cameron & Pomeroy, Caroline & Sutinen, Jon G., 2014. "Port level fishing dynamics: Assessing changes in the distribution of fishing activity over time," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 171-191.
    9. Gohar A. Petrossian & Frank S. Pezzella, 2018. "IUU Fishing and Seafood Fraud: Using Crime Script Analysis to Inform Intervention," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 679(1), pages 121-139, September.
    10. Baltar, Fabiola & Pagani, Andrea N. & Gualdoni, Patricia, 2018. "Análisis ampliado de la concentración económica bajo el Régimen de Cuotas Individuales Transferibles de Captura en Argentina: el caso de la pesquería de merluza común (stock sur) en el período 2010-20," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3115, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    11. Chang, Hung-Hao & Boisvert, Richard N. & Hung, Ling-Yi, 2010. "Land subsidence, production efficiency, and the decision of aquacultural firms in Taiwan to discontinue production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2448-2456, October.
    12. Rhona Barr & Susana Mourato, 2012. "Investigating fishers� preferences for the design of marine Payments for Environmental Services schemes," GRI Working Papers 101, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    13. Yamazaki, Satoshi & Resosudarmo, Budy P. & Girsang, Wardis & Hoshino, Eriko, 2018. "Productivity, Social Capital and Perceived Environmental Threats in Small-Island Fisheries: Insights from Indonesia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 62-75.
    14. Garza-Gil, M. Dolores & Varela-Lafuente, Manuel M. & Caballero-Miguez, Gonzalo & Álvarez-Díaz, Marcos, 2011. "Analysing the profitability of the Spanish fleet after the anchovy moratorium using bootstrap techniques," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1154-1161, April.
    15. BenDor, Todd & Scheffran, Jürgen & Hannon, Bruce, 2009. "Ecological and economic sustainability in fishery management: A multi-agent model for understanding competition and cooperation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 1061-1073, February.
    16. Federico Di Maio & Michele Luca Geraci & Danilo Scannella & Tommaso Russo & Fabio Fiorentino, 2022. "Evaluation of the Economic Performance of Coastal Trawling off the Southern Coast of Sicily (Central Mediterranean Sea)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Pascoe, Sean & Hutton, Trevor & van Putten, Ingrid & Dennis, Darren & Skewes, Tim & Plagányi, Éva & Deng, Roy, 2013. "DEA-based predictors for estimating fleet size changes when modelling the introduction of rights-based management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 681-687.
    18. Pradhan, Naresh C. & Leung, PingSun, 2006. "Incorporating sea turtle interactions in a multi-objective programming model for Hawaii's longline fishery," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 216-227, November.
    19. Duy, Nguyen Ngoc & Flaaten, Ola & Long, Le Kim, 2015. "Government support and profitability effects – Vietnamese offshore fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 77-86.
    20. Jonathan R. Sweeney & Richard E. Howitt & Hing Ling Chan & Minling Pan & PingSun Leung, 2017. "How do fishery policies affect Hawaii's longline fishing industry? Calibrating a positive mathematical programming model," Papers 1707.03960, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:42:y:2013:i:c:p:210-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.