IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v32y2008i1p120-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compliance costs and the small fisher: A study of exiters from the New Zealand fishery

Author

Listed:
  • Stewart, James
  • Walshe, Kim

Abstract

Over 3000 predominantly small-scale fishers have exited the New Zealand's quota management system (QMS) between its inception in 1986 and 2000. This study, based on the Ministry of Fisheries database and a questionnaire sent to the exiters, establishes that compliance costs in general, and those specifically related to the QMS, were one of the most consistent reasons for exit. Uncertainty about future QMS policy and the high cost of quota were also significant factors. It appears that the small fishers' perception of high compliance cost can be supported by industry data.

Suggested Citation

  • Stewart, James & Walshe, Kim, 2008. "Compliance costs and the small fisher: A study of exiters from the New Zealand fishery," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 120-131, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:32:y:2008:i:1:p:120-131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-597X(07)00058-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quinn Weninger, 2008. "Economic Benefits of Management Reform in the Gulf of Mexico Grouper Fishery: A Semi-parametric Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 41(4), pages 479-497, December.
    2. Stewart, James & Leaver, Jonathan, 2015. "Efficiency of the New Zealand annual catch entitlement market," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 11-22.
    3. Stewart, James & Callagher, Peter, 2013. "Industry response to the 2003 set net restrictions for protection of Maui′s dolphin," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 210-222.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:32:y:2008:i:1:p:120-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.