IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v99y2020ics0264837719315248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From deforestation to afforestation: Effect of slopeland use policies on land use/cover change in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Tu, Hung-Ming
  • Chen, Hui-Mei

Abstract

Understanding the effects of public policy on land-use/cover change is an important step for improving management strategies and policy. Few studies have constructed scholarly evidence on the effects of policy on slopeland change from deforestation to afforestation. This research adopted a land-use change analysis using GIS to evaluate the influence of the inducted slopeland-use policy on the slopeland-use change in Veterans Affairs Council (VAC) farms. Taiwan’s slopeland-use policies included Veteran Agricultural Reclamation Policy (VARP) (1955−1988), Farmland Release Policy (FRP) (1989–2004), and National Land Restoration Policy (NLRP) (2005−2015). The results showed that VARP quickly changed 21.15 % forestland into farmland to obtain economic benefits and cause potential negative environmental impacts through veterans’ migration. The potential labor and population migration should be considered on public policy decision-making for avoiding forestland-use change. The 7.36 % public farmland and 0.72 % private farmland changed into forestland in FRP. The 27.33 % public farmland and 3.53 % private farmland changed into forestland in NLRP. FRP changed public farmland into private farmland and obstructed afforestation. NLRP had a strong regulatory power for afforestation and potential ecological benefits with farmland reduction in public land. The effect of restoration policy was obstructed by private farmland. The potential land privatization should be taken into account for the efficacy of afforestation and conservation policy. This study also found critical information. The ecotourism and non-ecotourism strategies produced different slopeland-use changes and potential impacts. Ecotourism strategy increased 29.19 % and 9.72 % public forestland in two farm cases and reduced potential negative environmental impacts. Non-ecotourism strategy increased 9.81 % construction land and 2.05 % road on private land and reflected potential negative environmental impacts. Ecotourism strategy was suggested to be a suitable method to balance ecology and economy for sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Tu, Hung-Ming & Chen, Hui-Mei, 2020. "From deforestation to afforestation: Effect of slopeland use policies on land use/cover change in Taiwan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719315248
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719315248
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schielein, Johannes & Börner, Jan, 2018. "Recent transformations of land-use and land-cover dynamics across different deforestation frontiers in the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 81-94.
    2. Vorlaufer, Tobias & Falk, Thomas & Dufhues, Thomas & Kirk, Michael, 2017. "Payments for ecosystem services and agricultural intensification: Evidence from a choice experiment on deforestation in Zambia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 95-105.
    3. Glinskis, Emmalina A. & Gutiérrez-Vélez, Víctor H., 2019. "Quantifying and understanding land cover changes by large and small oil palm expansion regimes in the Peruvian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 95-106.
    4. Alan L. Porter & Alisa Kongthon & Jye-Chyi (JC) Lu, 2002. "Research profiling: Improving the literature review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 53(3), pages 351-370, March.
    5. Acheampong, Michael & Yu, Qiuyan & Enomah, Lucy Deba & Anchang, Julius & Eduful, Michael, 2018. "Land use/cover change in Ghana’s oil city: Assessing the impact of neoliberal economic policies and implications for sustainable development goal number one – A remote sensing and GIS approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 373-384.
    6. Helen Briassoulis, 2000. "Analysis of Land Use Change: Theoretical and Modeling Approaches," Wholbk, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, number 17, Fall.
    7. repec:rri:bkchap:17 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qijiao Xie & Yidi Han & Liming Zhang & Zhong Han, 2023. "Dynamic Evolution of Land Use/Land Cover and Its Socioeconomic Driving Forces in Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Yuanyuan & Bao, Wenkai & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Scenario simulation of land system change in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Hualin Xie & Yingqian Huang & Qianru Chen & Yanwei Zhang & Qing Wu, 2019. "Prospects for Agricultural Sustainable Intensification: A Review of Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Ying Huang & Donghua Zhu & Yue Qian & Yi Zhang & Alan L. Porter & Yuqin Liu & Ying Guo, 2017. "A hybrid method to trace technology evolution pathways: a case study of 3D printing," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(1), pages 185-204, April.
    4. René Poccard-Chapuis & Sophie Plassin & Reinis Osis & Daniel Pinillos & Gustavo Martinez Pimentel & Marcelo Cordeiro Thalês & François Laurent & Mario Rodrigo de Oliveira Gomes & Laura Angelica Ferrei, 2021. "Mapping Land Suitability to Guide Landscape Restoration in the Amazon," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Carauta, Marcelo & Troost, Christian & Guzman-Bustamante, Ivan & Hampf, Anna & Libera, Affonso & Meurer, Katharina & Bönecke, Eric & Franko, Uwe & Ribeiro Rodrigues, Renato de Aragão & Berger, Thomas, 2021. "Climate-related land use policies in Brazil: How much has been achieved with economic incentives in agriculture?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Christoph Schulze & Katarzyna Zagórska & Kati Häfner & Olimpia Markiewicz & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Bettina Matzdorf, 2024. "Using farmers' ex ante preferences to design agri‐environmental contracts: A systematic review," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 44-83, February.
    7. Dian Iriani, Latifah & Widodo, Tri, 2019. "The Implication of B20 Policy on Environment," MPRA Paper 91313, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Yonghan Ju & So Young Sohn, 2015. "Identifying patterns in rare earth element patents based on text and data mining," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 389-410, January.
    9. Veronika Asamer & Michael Braito & Klara Breitwieser & Barbara Enengel & Rainer Silber & Hans Karl Wytrzens, 2009. "Abschätzung der Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Bewirtschaftungsaufgabe landwirtschaftlicher Parzellen mittels GIS-gestützter Modellierung (PROBAT)," Working Papers 422009, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    10. Michelle C. A. Picoli & Ana Rorato & Pedro Leitão & Gilberto Camara & Adeline Maciel & Patrick Hostert & Ieda Del’Arco Sanches, 2020. "Impacts of Public and Private Sector Policies on Soybean and Pasture Expansion in Mato Grosso—Brazil from 2001 to 2017," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Falk, Thomas & Spangenberg, Joachim H. & Siegmund-Schultze, Marianna & Kobbe, Susanne & Feike, Til & Kuebler, Daniel & Settele, Josef & Vorlaufer, Tobias, 2018. "Identifying governance challenges in ecosystem services management – Conceptual considerations and comparison of global forest cases," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PB), pages 193-203.
    12. Cisneros, Elías & Börner, Jan & Pagiola, Stefano & Wunder, Sven, 2022. "Impacts of conservation incentives in protected areas: The case of Bolsa Floresta, Brazil," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. Olha Danylo & Johannes Pirker & Guido Lemoine & Guido Ceccherini & Linda See & Ian McCallum & Hadi & Florian Kraxner & Fr'ed'eric Achard & Steffen Fritz, 2020. "Satellite reveals age and extent of oil palm plantations in Southeast Asia," Papers 2002.07163, arXiv.org.
    14. da Silva Medina, Gabriel & Pokorny, Benno & Campbell, Bruce, 2022. "Forest governance in the Amazon: Favoring the emergence of local management systems," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    15. Daniella Tiemi Sasaki Okida & Osmar Abílio de Carvalho Júnior & Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho & Roberto Arnaldo Trancoso Gomes & Renato Fontes Guimarães, 2021. "Relationship between Land Property Security and Brazilian Amazon Deforestation in the Mato Grosso State during the Period 2013–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Blanca de-Miguel-Molina & Vicente Chirivella-González & Beatriz García-Ortega, 2016. "Corporate philanthropy and community involvement. Analysing companies from France, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2741-2766, November.
    17. Pereira, Alexia Saleme Aona de Paula & dos Santos, Vitor Juste & Alves, Sabrina do Carmo & Amaral e Silva, Arthur & da Silva, Charles Gomes & Calijuri, Maria Lúcia, 2022. "Contribution of rural settlements to the deforestation dynamics in the Legal Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    18. Andrea Bencsik, 2022. "Background on the Sustainability of Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Yan Yu & Ya Wu & Pan Wang & Yili Zhang & Liang Emlyn Yang & Xian Cheng & Jianzhong Yan, 2021. "Grassland Subsidies Increase the Number of Livestock on the Tibetan Plateau: Why Does the “Payment for Ecosystem Services” Policy Have the Opposite Outcome?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Dietz, Julia & Treydte, Anna Christina & Lippe, Melvin, 2023. "Exploring the future of Kafue National Park, Zambia: Scenario-based land use and land cover modelling to understand drivers and impacts of deforestation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719315248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.