IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v82y2019icp48-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open-access cloud resources contribute to mainstream REDD+: The case of Mozambique

Author

Listed:
  • Lopes, Catarina
  • Leite, Ana
  • Vasconcelos, Maria José

Abstract

The objective of this work is to investigate how Earth Observation data and processing platforms accessible on the cloud can facilitate the implementation of REDD+ in developing countries. For that, we explore newly available open-access satellite data, cloud processing, and a ready-made land cover map to assess the extent to which such resources can directly respond to monitoring and measuring, reporting, and verification requisites. Mozambique is one of the 47 countries selected to benefit from the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility to implement REDD+ strategies. However, to meet funding agreements, the country needs to periodically produce national land cover and land cover change maps at given resolution and accuracy levels. The work presented here shows that the land cover mapping requisites of REDD+ may be quickly and cost-effectively met through the development and use of newly available cloud resources. The study relies on an experimental design that tests the results of image processing approaches with algorithms available or developed in Google Earth Engine against country-wide reference data collected by a team of national experts. The results show that, in addition to pre-processing advantages, which facilitate multi-temporal compositing and mosaicking of very large and heavy data sets, developments in cloud processing and image classification swiftly produce large extent and high-resolution land cover maps, tailored to a specific objective. The comparison of results between the in-house map obtained using Google Earth Engine, and the pan-African map produced by the European Space Agency (2016) at the same spatial resolution, reveals that both maps meet REDD+ requirements for a binary Forest/Non-forest legend. However, the in-house map is more accurate and reaches considerably better results if a more complex, six class IPCC legend is required. Nevertheless, this study shows that, given adequate reference data, the need to periodically produce high resolution land cover maps for national forest monitoring purposes is no longer an obstacle for mainstreaming the implementation of REDD+.

Suggested Citation

  • Lopes, Catarina & Leite, Ana & Vasconcelos, Maria José, 2019. "Open-access cloud resources contribute to mainstream REDD+: The case of Mozambique," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 48-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:48-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718302709
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ochieng, R.M. & Visseren-Hamakers, I.J. & Arts, B. & Brockhaus, M. & Herold, M., 2016. "Institutional effectiveness of REDD+ MRV: Countries progress in implementing technical guidelines and good governance requirements," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 42-52.
    2. Alemayehu Midekisa & Felix Holl & David J Savory & Ricardo Andrade-Pacheco & Peter W Gething & Adam Bennett & Hugh J W Sturrock, 2017. "Mapping land cover change over continental Africa using Landsat and Google Earth Engine cloud computing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Aja & Michael K. Miyittah & Donatus Bapentire Angnuureng, 2022. "Quantifying Mangrove Extent Using a Combination of Optical and Radar Images in a Wetland Complex, Western Region, Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Morgan, Edward A. & Buckwell, Andrew & Guidi, Caterina & Garcia, Beatriz & Rimmer, Lawrence & Cadman, Tim & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Capturing multiple forest ecosystem services for just benefit sharing: The Basket of Benefits Approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    3. Sheng, Jichuan & Qiu, Hong, 2018. "Governmentality within REDD+: Optimizing incentives and efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 611-622.
    4. Kotapati Narayana Loukika & Venkata Reddy Keesara & Venkataramana Sridhar, 2021. "Analysis of Land Use and Land Cover Using Machine Learning Algorithms on Google Earth Engine for Munneru River Basin, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Zofia Kuzevicova & Diana Bobikova & Stefan Kuzevic & Samer Khouri, 2021. "Changes in the Country and Their Impact on Topographic Data of Agricultural Land—A Case Study of Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Wurtzebach, Zachary & Casse, Thorkil & Meilby, Henrik & Nielsen, Martin R. & Milhøj, Anders, 2019. "REDD+ policy design and policy learning: The emergence of an integrated landscape approach in Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 129-139.
    7. Pankaj Bajracharya & Selima Sultana, 2020. "Rank-size Distribution of Cities and Municipalities in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Wakjira Takala Dibaba & Tamene Adugna Demissie & Konrad Miegel, 2020. "Drivers and Implications of Land Use/Land Cover Dynamics in Finchaa Catchment, Northwestern Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Chasia, Stanley & Olang, Luke O. & Sitoki, Lewis, 2023. "Modelling of land-use/cover change trajectories in a transboundary catchment of the Sio-Malaba-Malakisi Region in East Africa using the CLUE-s model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    10. Wubeshet Damtea & Dongyeob Kim & Sangjun Im, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Land Cover Changes in the Chemoga Basin, Ethiopia, Using Landsat and Google Earth Images," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Adams, Marshall Alhassan & Kayira, Jean & Tegegne, Yitagesu Tekle & Gruber, James S., 2020. "A comparative analysis of the institutional capacity of FLEGT VPA in Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Ghana, Liberia, and the Republic of the Congo," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. World Bank, 2017. "The Potential Role of Enhanced Bond Structures in Forest Climate Finance," World Bank Publications - Reports 28586, The World Bank Group.
    13. Jewel Andoh & Yohan Lee, 2018. "National REDD+ Strategy for Climate Change Mitigation: A Review and Comparison of Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Ricardo Andrade-Pacheco & David J Savory & Alemayehu Midekisa & Peter W Gething & Hugh J W Sturrock & Adam Bennett, 2019. "Household electricity access in Africa (2000–2013): Closing information gaps with model-based geostatistics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Motuma Shiferaw Regasa & Michael Nones & Dereje Adeba, 2021. "A Review on Land Use and Land Cover Change in Ethiopian Basins," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Miaomiao Ma & Youfeng Zou & Wenzhi Zhang & Chunhui Chen, 2022. "Landscape Pattern Consistency Assessment of 10 m Land Cover Products in Different Ecological Zoning Contexts of Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:48-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.