IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v81y2019icp256-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the amount, heterogeneity, and pattern of farmland: Implications for China’s requisition-compensation balance of farmland policy

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Luo
  • Liu, Zhenjie
  • Gong, Jianzhou
  • Wang, Lu
  • Hu, Yueming

Abstract

This study analyzed the amount, heterogeneity, and pattern of farmland subject to the requisition–compensation balance of farmland (RCBF) policy from 2011 to 2015 in China’s economic development frontier area of Guangdong Province. The study used vector data for land-use and land-cover change and farmland quality from the Department of Land Resources of Guangdong Province and socio-economic statistical data from the statistical yearbook. To determine practical and potential problems during the implementation of RCBF, we calculated the differences between the area of compensatory farmland and requisitioned farmland according to different farmland types and quality grades at both the provincial and sub-regional scale. A series of pattern metrics reflecting land fragmentation and aggregation were identified at the class and landscape levels. The results revealed the presence of “superior occupation and inferior compensation” and “paddy field occupation and dry land compensation.” The landscape pattern experienced different degrees of influence after farmland requisition and compensation. The tendency was for a large area of woodland and grassland adjacent to each other to be exploited, leading to a series of ecological and environmental problems. Due to considerations of economic benefit and cost, much of the compensatory farmland provided following land exploitation has been inefficient, unreasonable, and unstable. Although some complementary policies have been proposed, such as “linking the increase in urban construction land with a decrease in rural construction land,” primary problems of RCBF are still difficult to be solved. We suggest that specific technical specifications for land exploitation, land reclamation, and land consolidation should be formed based on regional characteristics. Local government should improve the existing relevant support policies and continue to strengthen land reclamation and land consolidation in the future, with full consideration of the need for ecological environmental protection and improvement of the farmland landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Luo & Liu, Zhenjie & Gong, Jianzhou & Wang, Lu & Hu, Yueming, 2019. "Quantifying the amount, heterogeneity, and pattern of farmland: Implications for China’s requisition-compensation balance of farmland policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 256-266.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:81:y:2019:i:c:p:256-266
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718303296
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Chanel & Laurence Delattre & Claude Napoléone, 2014. "Determinants of Local Public Policies for Farmland Preservation and Urban Expansion: A French Illustration," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(3), pages 411-433.
    2. Chengri Ding & Erik Lichtenberg, 2011. "Land And Urban Economic Growth In China," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 299-317, May.
    3. Xiaofeng Zhao & Yuqian Zheng & Xianjin Huang & Mei-Po Kwan & Yuntai Zhao, 2017. "The Effect of Urbanization and Farmland Transfer on the Spatial Patterns of Non-Grain Farmland in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Jianhua He & Xiaodong Guan & Yan Yu, 2016. "A Modeling Approach for Farmland Protection Zoning Considering Spatial Heterogeneity: A Case Study of E-Zhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Li Jiang & Karen C. Seto & Junfei Bai, 2015. "Urban economic development, changes in food consumption patterns and land requirements for food production in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 240-261, May.
    6. Alison J. Eagle & David E. Eagle & Tracy E. Stobbe & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2015. "Farmland Protection and Agricultural Land Values at the Urban-Rural Fringe: British Columbia's Agricultural Land Reserve," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(1), pages 282-298.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deslatte, Aaron & Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna & Tavares, António F. & Ślawska, Justyna & Karsznia, Izabela & Łukomska, Julita, 2022. "Land use institutions and social-ecological systems: A spatial analysis of local landscape changes in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zheng, Xian, 2020. "Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Zhonghua Huang & Xuejun Du, 2017. "Strategic interaction in local governments’ industrial land supply: Evidence from China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(6), pages 1328-1346, May.
    5. Yu, Zhenning & Wu, Cifang & Tan, Yongzhong & Zhang, Xiaobin, 2018. "The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 602-611.
    6. Andi Syah Putra & Guangji Tong & Didit Okta Pribadi, 2020. "Spatial Analysis of Socio-Economic Driving Factors of Food Expenditure Variation between Provinces in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Weiping Zhang & Peiji Shi & Huali Tong, 2022. "Research on Construction Land Use Benefit and the Coupling Coordination Relationship Based on a Three-Dimensional Frame Model—A Case Study in the Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Taiyang Zhong & Xianjin Huang & Lifang Ye & Steffanie Scott, 2014. "The Impacts on Illegal Farmland Conversion of Adopting Remote Sensing Technology for Land Inspection in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Olivier Chanel & Laurence Delattre & Claude Napoléone, 2014. "Determinants of Local Public Policies for Farmland Preservation and Urban Expansion: A French Illustration," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(3), pages 411-433.
    10. Bo Huang & Haitong Li & Jinghua Lei & Yiqian Wang, 2024. "Free land, heavy burden: Industrial land administrative allocation and local fiscal imbalance in China," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 312-333, March.
    11. Liejia Huang & Yue Feng & Boqing Zhang & Weiyan Hu, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Obstacle Factors of Cultivated Land Resources Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Yunyang Ji & Xiaoxin Guo & Shihu Zhong & Lina Wu, 2020. "Land Financialization, Uncoordinated Development of Population Urbanization and Land Urbanization, and Economic Growth: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Jihong Li & Rongxu Qiu & Kaiming Li & Wei Xu, 2018. "Informal Land Development on the Urban Fringe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Niu, Fangqu & Li, Jun, 2018. "Modeling the population and industry distribution impacts of urban land use policies in Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 347-359.
    15. Li, Shi & Vendryes, Thomas, 2018. "Real estate activity, democracy and land rights in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 54-79.
    16. Deininger,Klaus W. & Jin,Songqing & Liu,Shouying & Xia,Fang, 2015. "Impact of property rights reform to support China?s rural-urban integration : household-level evidence from the Chengdu national experiment," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7388, The World Bank.
    17. Yirui Han & Qinqin Pan & Yuee Cao & Jianhong Zhang & Jiaxuan Yuan & Borui Li & Saiqiang Li & Renfeng Ma & Xu Luo & Longbin Sha & Xiaodong Yang, 2022. "Estimation of Grain Crop Yields after Returning the Illegal Nurseries and Orchards to Cultivated Land in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Chai, Yuan & Pardey, Philip G. & Chan-Kang, Connie & Huang, Jikun & Lee, Kyuseon & Dong, Wanlu, 2019. "Passing the food and agricultural R&D buck? The United States and China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Dana Alsaad & Mohammed Al-Mahish, 2024. "Demand and Nutrient Elasticities of Egg Consumption: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Sanz Sanz, Esther & Martinetti, Davide & Napoléone, Claude, 2018. "Operational modelling of peri-urban farmland for public action in Mediterranean context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 757-771.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:81:y:2019:i:c:p:256-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.