IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v79y2018icp556-574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualisation and perception of the landscape and its changes in a transboundary area. A case study of the Southern German-French borderland

Author

Listed:
  • Konkoly-Gyuró, Éva

Abstract

The interaction of human civilisation with nature is reflected in landscape that we consider as a model of totality, a micro-cosmos, providing us a perfect terrain to analyse and systematise knowledge on relationships of its elements. Since we consider humans as constitutive part of the landscape, the way of thinking of stakeholders is crucial in landscape formation. In this study, we present the perception of local professionals on the landscape character and landscape changes in a German-French transboundary area, in the southern section of the Upper Rhine Valley between Freiburg/Breisgau and Colmar. Broadening the knowledge about the common and different attitudes and motivations of local professionals helps transboundary cooperation in order to preserve the unique landscape qualities and avoid landscape degradation. The research was an inductive social study based on in-depth interviews. Respondents’ narratives on present characteristics and changes of the landscapes have been analysed, compared and theorised by the grounded theory method. The assessment led first to the definition of seven interpretation axes, (ontological, epistemological, temporal, operative, causal, spatial, and personal), that gave a logical structure to order the information of the interviews and to describe the results. These dimensions also served as a red-thread for the formulation of thirteen concluding theories emerging from the assessment of the narratives. They answer the questions: What is landscape? How landscape characteristics can be captured? What happens, why, when and where in the landscape? The study revealed the similarities and differences of the attitudes, and the patterns of thoughts of German and French professionals. The study brings new insight in the field of transboundary landscape study while confirming existing results on the main topics of landscape changes and driving forces. The paper proves that future strategies have to deal with often-contradictory landscape concepts in neighbouring countries, while their understanding facilitates communication and helps harmonise goals in policies and management.

Suggested Citation

  • Konkoly-Gyuró, Éva, 2018. "Conceptualisation and perception of the landscape and its changes in a transboundary area. A case study of the Southern German-French borderland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 556-574.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:79:y:2018:i:c:p:556-574
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718307506
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darnhofer, Ika & Schermer, Markus & Steinbacher, Melanie & Gabillet, Marine & Daugstad, Karoline, 2017. "Preserving permanent mountain grasslands in Western Europe: Why are promising approaches not implemented more widely?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 306-315.
    2. Thanasis Kizos & Tobias Plieninger & Theodoros Iosifides & María García-Martín & Geneviève Girod & Krista Karro & Hannes Palang & Anu Printsmann & Brian Shaw & Julianna Nagy & Marie-Alice Budniok, 2018. "Responding to Landscape Change: Stakeholder Participation and Social Capital in Five European Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piotr Krajewski, 2019. "Monitoring of Landscape Transformations within Landscape Parks in Poland in the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Walter Musakwa & Shuai Wang & Fangli Wei & Olgah Lerato Malapane & Masala Makumule Thomas & Sydney Mavengahama & Hongwei Zeng & Bingfang Wu & Wenwu Zhao & Nesisa Analisa Nyathi & Zama Eric Mashimbye &, 2020. "Survey of Community Livelihoods and Landscape Change along the Nzhelele and Levuvhu River Catchments in Limpopo Province, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Targetti, Stefano & Schaller, Lena L. & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2021. "A fuzzy cognitive mapping approach for the assessment of public-goods governance in agricultural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Joaquin Romano & Emilio Pérez-Chinarro & Byron V. Coral, 2020. "Network of Landscapes in the Sustainable Management of Transboundary Biosphere Reserves," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Joanna T. Storie & Enri Uusna & Zane Eglāja & Teele Laur & Mart Külvik & Monika Suškevičs & Simon Bell, 2019. "Place Attachment and Its Consequence for Landscape-Scale Management and Readiness to Participate: Social Network Complexity in the Post-Soviet Rural Context of Latvia and Estonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Joaquin Romano & Byron V. Coral, 2020. "Public Management, Private Management and Collective Action in the Portoviejo River Basin: Visions and Conflicts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Jorge Andres Garcia & Angelos Alamanos, 2022. "Integrated Modelling Approaches for Sustainable Agri-Economic Growth and Environmental Improvement: Examples from Greece, Canada and Ireland," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Morawetz, Ulrich B. & Tribl, Christoph, 2020. "Randomised Controlled Trials for the Evaluation of the CAP: Empirical Evidence about Acceptance by Farmers," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 69(3), July.
    7. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. De Vries, 2018. "Indicators for Measuring Spatial Justice and Land Tenure Security for Poor and Low Income Urban Dwellers," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-34, July.
    8. Dorota Sikora & Małgorzata Kaczyńska, 2022. "The Cultural Ecosystem Services as an Element Supporting Manor Landscape Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-33, June.
    9. Swagemakers, Paul & Schermer, Markus & Domínguez García, María Dolores & Milone, Pierluigi & Ventura, Flaminia, 2021. "To what extent do brands contribute to sustainability transition in agricultural production practices? Lessons from three European case studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Tiziano Tempesta & Daniel Vecchiato, 2018. "The Value of a Properly Maintained Hiking Trail Network and a Traditional Landscape for Mountain Recreation in the Dolomites," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Katia Talento & Miguel Amado & Josè Carlos Kullberg, 2019. "Landscape—A Review with a European Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, May.
    12. Wei Li & Yang Zhou & Zhanwei Zhang, 2021. "Strategies of Landscape Planning in Peri-Urban Rural Tourism: A Comparison between Two Villages in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Fernando J. Garrigos-Simon & M. Dolores Botella-Carrubi & Tomas F. Gonzalez-Cruz, 2018. "Social Capital, Human Capital, and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Sebastian Eiter & Wendy Fjellstad & Oskar Puschmann & Svein Olav Krøgli, 2019. "Long-Term Monitoring of Protected Cultural Heritage Environments in Norway: Development of Methods and First-Time Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Vassiliki Vlami & Carlos Morera Beita & Stamatis Zogaris, 2022. "Landscape Conservation Assessment in the Latin American Tropics: Application and Insights from Costa Rica," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Gunawan Prayitno & Ainul Hayat & Achmad Efendi & Aidha Auliah & Dian Dinanti, 2022. "Structural Model of Community Social Capital for Enhancing Rural Communities Adaptation against the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from Pujon Kidul Tourism Village, Malang Regency, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Karoline Daugstad, 2019. "Resilience in Mountain Farming in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-11, June.
    18. Kelemen, Eszter & Megyesi, Boldizsár & Matzdorf, Bettina & Andersen, Erling & van Bussel, Lenny G.J. & Dumortier, Myriam & Dutilly, Céline & García-Llorente, Marina & Hamon, Christine & LePage, Annabe, 2023. "The prospects of innovative agri-environmental contracts in the European policy context: Results from a Delphi study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    19. Suškevičs, Monika & Karner, Katrin & Bethwell, Claudia & Danzinger, Florian & Kay, Sonja & Nishizawa, Takamasa & Schuler, Johannes & Sepp, Kalev & Värnik, Rando & Glemnitz, Michael & Semm, Maaria & Um, 2023. "Stakeholder perceptions of agricultural landscape services, biodiversity, and drivers of change in four European case studies," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:79:y:2018:i:c:p:556-574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.